https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42663
--- Comment #26 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #25) > The next step after bugs 41892 41893 41894 41897 41974 41975 ? But wouldn't > it make more sense for those bug reports to depend on this one? They all > would need to be updated to use the OOP version, but it just seems more > logical? In a way, it's a bit of a chicken and egg problem, but if we have Koha::Context as OOP first, then there's less double-handling and all the circular deps can be removed on separate timelines - rather than needing to be done before this one can move forward. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
