https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42310
--- Comment #66 from Martin Renvoize (ashimema) <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 203168 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=203168&action=edit Bug 42310: (QA follow-up) Reject in-place date changes on SingleClosure/Exception store() only flushes the _holidays cache on insert, on the assumption that updates only ever touch title/description. That assumption held for every current caller (ModSingleholiday/ModExceptionholiday only ever change those two fields), but nothing enforced it - a future caller updating date in place would silently desync the cache for up to its TTL, with no error. Make the assumption explicit: reject an update that changes date, rather than silently allowing it. Callers that need to move a closure/exception to a different date must delete and re-add. Test plan: 1) prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Library/Calendar.t t/db_dependent/Calendar.t t/db_dependent/Holidays.t t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
