http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10807
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Galen Charlton from comment #23) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #21) > > I created the module in the C4 namespace precisely because it is not a OO > > module. > > I don't recall there be any requirement that the Koha names *only* be for > OO-modules. New modules should preferentially be OO, but there is a place > in Koha for modules that are simply collections of utility code. Galen, It is in the coding guidelines: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Coding_Guidelines#PERL15:_Object-oriented_code_and_the_Koha::_namespace To me this module is not perfect (by far). So I had a preference for submitting the module as it into the C4 namespace. > In this case, Koha::Search::History can be readily made OO, IMO. I will try to move the existing module to the Koha namespace. But I prefer to do it after these patches (and patches from bug 10862) will be pushed. Hope that make sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
