https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41809
--- Comment #12 from Benjamin Daeuber <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Andrew Fuerste-Henry from comment #11) > (In reply to Benjamin Daeuber from comment #10) > > (In reply to Andrew Fuerste-Henry from comment #9) > > > > > > This change will disrupt libraries' reporting of how many holds they fill > > > over time. The patron's hold is moved to the old_reserves table with > > > found='W', giving the impression that the hold was cancelled without the > > > patron ever receiving an item. But in fact this hold was fulfilled, just > > > not > > > with the waiting item. > > > > I really don't know if it was fulfilled. The title was checked out, yes, but > > not through the holds process. That hold still needed to be handled by a > > staff person a second time, for one. I'm asking around here, but I tend to > > lean towards this hold being cancelled, not filled. > > The circ rule controlling this behavior is worded "Fill other record level > holds on record at checkout." > The current behavior, before these patches, is for the hold to be marked > filled when another eligible item from the same bib is checked out. > The ability to cancel the hold rather than filling it could be a reasonable > change, but would need to be optional. This makes sense. It's certainly not an issue that matters enough to me to hold up a fix for this problem. This is a problem with an outsized service impact and a very small statistical impact so I think either way is fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
