https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42639
--- Comment #18 from Bo Gustavsson <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #17) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #16) > > (In reply to Bo Gustavsson from comment #15) > > > (In reply to David Nind from comment #14) > > > > I've signed off, but I do have a question. > > > > > > > > Should "None specified" be a valid option? > > > > > > > > Before the patch, if "None specified" is selected, there is no value in > > > > the > > > > database for the sex field. > > > > > > > > After the patch, you can't choose "None specified". > > > > > > I don’t think “None specified” should be selectable. I find it more > > > intuitive than having it pre-filled when it isn’t an allowed option. > > > > > > “None specified” is, of course, selectable and should be the default value > > > when “Gender (sex)” is not marked as required. > > > > I disagree. It's possible to select "none specified" now and it's a valid > > option for us if a patron chooses not to disclose that information. Other is > > used for "divers" in German, so not a replacement here. This change of > > behavior would cause problems for a lot of libraries. > > Hm, maybe things are different when you are making the field mandatory. > Sorry, it's early here still and my brain is just warming up. As there is no > other way to unselect, it would make sense for that use case. As long as it > stays selectable for non-mandatory. Yes exactly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
