https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42639
Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA --- Comment #16 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Bo Gustavsson from comment #15) > (In reply to David Nind from comment #14) > > I've signed off, but I do have a question. > > > > Should "None specified" be a valid option? > > > > Before the patch, if "None specified" is selected, there is no value in the > > database for the sex field. > > > > After the patch, you can't choose "None specified". > > I don’t think “None specified” should be selectable. I find it more > intuitive than having it pre-filled when it isn’t an allowed option. > > “None specified” is, of course, selectable and should be the default value > when “Gender (sex)” is not marked as required. I disagree. It's possible to select "none specified" now and it's a valid option for us if a patron chooses not to disclose that information. Other is used for "divers" in German, so not a replacement here. This change of behavior would cause problems for a lot of libraries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
