Well there is no aim for widespread DBIx::Class usage in 3.4 we do only have 6 months. All we are proposing to do is make use of DBIx::Class::Schema
On 28 Oct 2010 03:52, "Fouts, Clay" <[email protected]> wrote: On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Dobrica Pavlinusic <[email protected]> wrote: > > You are correct t... DBIx::Class handles cache invalidation very well as long as it is used uniformly as the only means of accessing the database. My concern is more in regards to the challenges with getting all of Koha's use of a given set of tables to go through the dbic interface. > Another intersting bit is change at: > > http://git.rot13.org/?p=koha.git;a=commit;h=8b27e87c2... While this is much faster, the ISO format has hard-coded limitations that Koha needs to surpass. > From my expirience so far, there are quite a few more low hanging fruits > which we can pick in... Getting Koha to run persistently (and to do so safely!) seems like a higher priority in my estimation than the conversion to DBIC, if for no other reason than pervasive use of DBIC is going to seriously impede CGI performance. In mean time, I find that applying small, judicious use of local caching often gives a high return on very little time and additional code while not interfering with the API. Clay _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
