I am gleaning that from personal testing. That test script is very system-dependent, unfortunately, so not meaningfully distributed.
But to clarify a bit, I tested with the ExpatXS module and using the M::R::new_from_xml() method. Creating the new object from an XML record with 1,000 embedded 952 tags took half the amount of time in ExpatXS as compared to LibXML::Parser. Clay On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Thomas Krichel <[email protected]> wrote: > Clay Fouts writes > > > Expat is considerably faster than the LibXML implementation, > > What is your source for this information? A quick Google > search seems to suggest that Expat is a bit faster, but > not much. > > Cheers, > > Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel > http://authorclaim.org/profile/pkr1 > skype: thomaskrichel >
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
