On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Chris Cormack <[email protected]> wrote: > Options as I see them > 1/ Continue with the current workflow, patches signed off, passed qa, > then into master, with the goal to increase the rate patches are > signed off
This is my vote! I know it takes more work and more time for features to be approved, but I'm for a more stable, tested Koha. That said, I am most certainly not for option #4. Chris has done amazing things for Koha, for open source, and for me personally. Without your efforts Chris I wouldn't be a Koha community member today and would have never thought to help get the manual off the ground. I agree that you do look out for the best interests of Koha and I think that a more stable Koha is in the best interests of the software and the community. Nicole _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
