On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:19 PM, James, Mason <[email protected]> wrote:
> the big difference is that Biblibre, software-coop, (and all other Koha > support companies) do *not* make their own Koha releases, > unlike PTFS/Liblime > > BL and SW-COOP understand that having many company-releases of many > Koha-forks is harmful to the reputation of the Koha project, so they > respectfully choose not to do that... (a subtle point that only PTFS/Liblime > fail to understand) > There are a large number of successful open source software projects that defy this supposition. Forks are a vital part of the open source ecosystem that provide competitive feedback into the software development process. PTFS/Liblime is the *only* company that continues to release its own 'Koha', > and the only company to renege on it commitment to integrate its > enhancements back to the Koha codebase > > PTFS/Liblime seem to have missed the fundamental point of participating in > the Koha project. > I think it's fair to say there's disagreement on what the fundamental point of participating in the Koha project is. Regards, Clay
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
