On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 05:46:35PM +0100, Paul Poulain wrote: > My first surprise (and I did the tests 3 times to be sure I wasn't > making a mistake !) is that you almost get no speed improvement with > memcache ON.
I have seen similar behaviour when I benchmarked Koha about a year ago[1] In the end, I opted to test with plain Memoize as opposed to memcache-backed one. My assumption was that TCP overhead eats away all improvements we might get from memcache (or to put it nicely, mysql and zebra are not *that* slow :-) 1: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7177 2: http://git.rot13.org/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=b2155fc483f09b34c4a6ba92256f2732152bb1d5;hp=daadc5bc8f24e1bf2c1e8d958d410408d1cccc47 -- Dobrica Pavlinusic 2share!2flame [email protected] Unix addict. Internet consultant. http://www.rot13.org/~dpavlin _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
