Am 28.05.12 16:48, schrieb Paul Poulain: > Hello koha-devel, > > I just pushed a follow-up for bug 6858. If you look at the patch, you'll > see that the author is from BibLibre, as well as the sign-offer. But if > you look more carefully on the patch comments, you may understand that > Stephane Delaye has signed-off "in the name of the library". We're > facing here a case where the library don't want/can't sign-off their > patch (they don't know how to do it and don't want to bother with doing > it. They just said this patch worked for them) > > At BibLibre, we have 3 project managers: Stéphane Delaye / Gaetan > Boisson / François Charbonnier. They are librarians and are doing the > glue between the library our customer and our developers. > they know how to sign-off a patch. > > I want, in this mail, request that those 3 ppl from BibLibre (and only > them) can be sign-offers for patches written by another BibLibre > developer, once the library has confirmed it works. > > I propose that we define a standard message, something like > Signed-off-by: Delaye Stephane <[email protected]> > patch validated by <LIBRARY NAME>, signed-off in their name > > Can I have your agreement with this idea ?
I have absolutely no problem with this. To me it sounds like "signed of by stephane delaye of biblibre, on behalf of <LIBRARY NAME>", which is a perfectly fine proxy situation. > (of course, in case another support provider has the same kind of > situation, this would also be applicable. It's not something I want for > BibLibre only) - Marc _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
