Just to add in my opinion here. As someone who has been in Paul's situation, where a library (that has paid us to write them code) has been testing (and sometimes using the code in production) and has confirmed that things work I agree that putting a sign off in their name should be an okay practice. I also agree though that someone not from my company should QA the patch - that extra set of outside eyes is essential.
What I don't think should happen (and I don't think anyone is suggesting this) is that a patch that is written by our company and signed off by our partner should have to wait for another sign off before hitting the QA queue. Thanks (and see many of you soon!), Nicole C. Engard _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
