On 22/08/14 12:32, Paul A wrote:
At 10:16 PM 8/21/2014 +0000, Indranil Das Gupta wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to use the KPZ structure in some of my projects. In
general, I've found it rather useful, with a few modifications.
End rant. I promote Koha wherever I can, but in my job I've got to stay
practical. Over the last four years we've put in place a marvelous OPAC
meeting our users requirements. Please keep up the good work, but
please also maintain core stability. Compare with Debian (lenny,
squeeze, wheezy, 2 year cycle); Ubuntu (lynx, pangolin, tahr, 2 year
cycle); Apache (2.2 ==> 2.4, eight/ten? year cycle); MySQL (fairly minor
in the 5. series, no urgency); Perl (ditto); etc...
If you and others are willing to pay people to do this, it will get
done. That's what it boils down. 4 years of something ... maybe time to
contribute back?
Chris
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
