Mirko Tietgen schreef op zo 28-06-2015 om 20:52 [+0100]: > Apart from having learned to take sunday off instead of writing > redundant code, I wonder why we have these two categories which seem > to be confusing to everyone. Take a look and you will see what I > mean, there is a lot of koha-* scripts in both.
I actually got myself added to the CC of the command-line scripts category the other week because I noticed that was happening. > Can we agree on having all command-line stuff used exclusively with > package installations in »packaging« in the future? I'd be inclined to go the other way: if it's a command-line program at all, put it in the command-line category. My rationale behind this is that people who aren't regular committers shouldn't have to know what distinguishes a command line script from a package script. I also could argue that the scripts aren't really part of the packaging, but the boundary is hazy. But to be honest, I don't mind too much, though would like something to be chosen for exactly this reason (and, if there's a standard, then they can get triaged to the appropriate category easily enough if they're wrong.) -- Robin Sheat Catalyst IT Ltd. ✆ +64 4 803 2204 GPG: 5FA7 4B49 1E4D CAA4 4C38 8505 77F5 B724 F871 3BDF
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
