Friday's stone in the pond :)
Were you thinking like what is done today for MARC / UNIMARC / NORMAC,
choosing upon installation and then using one model?
Or more as "mixing different data-models in one Koha"?
That would need a column for storing the data model ID for each record
and somewhere to store each data-model definitions (linking to the
forementionned id).
This looks a bit like what we do for Bokeh.
Since we import records from different systems, we store the relation
between a record or item and it's system of origin.
We also store a mapping configuration for each system Bokeh is connected
to (be it several Koha of different configuration, several ILS, ILS +
online ressources, whatever combination...).
On 03/12/2021 11:00, Paul Poulain wrote:
Hello all,
Regarding this topic : why not also investigate the new data models
that will replace MARC ?
We store the data in original form (marcxml) and move to
biblio/biblioitems a part of the data that is useful for basic
operation (like getting the title and the author).
We could import different data models with the same mechanism (RDA,
DC, ...). The biblio_metadata.format and schema fields were created
with this idea in mind. That would require an additional layer for
transforming format/schema to internal Koha and many more things, it's
a long term goal.
Le 01/12/2021 à 12:55, Jonathan Druart a écrit :
3. Merge biblio and biblioitem
Self-explanatory, merge the 2 tables to remove the unneeded 1-1
relation between them
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : https://www.koha-community.org/
git : https://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : https://bugs.koha-community.org/
