Hi Jesse, is it possible you changed something in order to index 880 that got lost in in the update? 880 is not indexed by default atm I think, but probably should still be searchable in keyword search.
Is there any warning on the systme information tab of the about page? Hope this helps, Katrin Am 10.06.2016 um 17:53 schrieb Jesse A Lambertson: > Hello and Happy Friday community, > > I have a question about enabling the indexing and searching of Arabic > script in Koha. > > We are currently running a package installation of 3.20 on debian 7. > > In this installation, we are fully able to search in Arabic as the 880 > fields are properly indexed. > > But we are also now running a dev/test koha 3.22 (installed from > tarball) on the same server to work out some issues of our > customization. We are planning to then update the 3.20 instance to 16.05 > on Debian 8.5. This will surely be a package installation (install > koha-common etc). > > We are having troubles getting the Arabic language indexing to work on > the 3.22 dev/test instance (ICU is on, we followed this: > https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Correcting_Search_of_Arabic_records > > My question is: Were there be any fundamental changes to 3.22 that would > prevent the Arabic language indexing (880 fields) from working? Is this > perhaps tied to the tarball installation? > > Should we expect the same difficulties when we update the main instance > then to 16.05? Or should we expect all other configurations to roll > smoothly into 16.05? > > Thank you much, > > Jesse > _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org [email protected] https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
