This blog's article introduces serious confusions about FOSS movement.
Table reflects poor study when classifies Linux (and not GNU) as an
operating system, while Android is Linux-based too.

"Open source" only means consumers can see the design. Nothing more
about freedom. Many JavaScript programs can be understood as Open Source
while them are proprietary-licensed.

"Proprietary software is created and sold by a corporation" -> Same as
RedHat Linux, Virtuozzo, QCAD, etc. (all FOSS)

"Open source software (OSS) is created by a community of software
developers (programmers)" -> Most of OSS and FOSS programs are created
by a single person per project.

With the 4 enumerated freedoms it tries to simulate equality between OSS
and FOSS and "free as in beer".



El 18/07/18 a les 19:19, King, Fred ha escrit:
> This popped up in a weekly digest of tweets I get from the US National 
> Institutes of Health. It's a couple of years old, but it's a great 
> description of Open Source software-what it is, why it's free, and why you 
> should use it. It might be useful for someone trying to persuade their 
> organization to switch to Koha.
> 
> https://communityhealthmaps.nlm.nih.gov/2016/08/05/so-what-is-open-source-exactly/
> 
> Fred King
> Medical Librarian, MedStar Washington Hospital Center
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> 202-877-6670
> ORCID 0000-0001-5266-0279
> MedStar Authors Catalog: http://medstarauthors.org
> 
> Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how 
> fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always gotten there first, and 
> is waiting for it.
> --Terry Pratchett
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
> [email protected]
> https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
> 
_______________________________________________
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
[email protected]
https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

Reply via email to