Dear All In our university, the fine calculation rule is as under:
- Rs.10/- per day will be charged upto seven days after due date - Rs.50/- per day will be charged after seven days anybody know about the setting to calculate the fines? I shall be thankful. Regards! Rizwan Majeed On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 4:06 AM Jonathan Druart < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Raymund, > > I would also check the access logs around this timestamp. > > Regards, > Jonathan > > Le ven. 12 avr. 2019 à 03:29, Raymund Delahunty > <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > We have recently had two examples of what appears to be Koha issuing an > item to a reader “by itself” without any staff member doing the operation. > Both took place at the same library site, and same issue desk, but > different staff users logged on. We are multi-site, multi-issue desk, with > heavy use of self-issue, but the problem is only reported (so far) using > Circulation (so no SIP2 traffic), and at the one location. Yesterday we > received this: > > “This morning Koha decided to randomly issue an item to a student. The > student wasn't present- she only emailed us once she had automatic > notification of her borrowing the item. The item was issued at 10:13 today. > This never happened. We still have the item in our cupboard. It looks like > Koha duplicated the student's previous transaction that had taken place a > couple of days earlier. Neither of us on the desk issued the item, or > remember anything unusual. Could it be that when we logged into Koha, it > had that transaction still in its memory somehow????”) > > Our support company have advised: “We have investigated this transaction > in the logs but there isn't anything to indicate what might have happened. > It is recorded as a checkout in the standard way. > > | 29319123 | 2019-04-09 10:13:04 | 341304 | CIRCULATION | ISSUE | > 370312 | 1407873 > > I'm afraid there isn't very much more we can do regarding this […]” > > The previous example was sort-of similar- a laptop was returned by a > user and it was *immediately* issued to a staff member who had borrowed > (and returned) the item *the previous day*. She immediately complained that > she was at her office, and away from the library, and had NOT borrowed the > laptop. > > Has anyone experience this? Any ideas what we should look for? Thanks > for any suggestions. > > Ray Delahunty > > University of the Arts London > > This email and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee and > may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient > of this email and/or its attachments you must not take any action based > upon them and you must not copy or show them to anyone. Please send the > email back to us and immediately and permanently delete it and its > attachments. Where this email is unrelated to the business of University of > the Arts London or of any of its group companies the opinions expressed in > it are the opinions of the sender and do not necessarily constitute those > of University of the Arts London (or the relevant group company). Where the > sender's signature indicates that the email is sent on behalf of UAL Short > Courses Limited the following also applies: UAL Short Courses Limited is a > company registered in England and Wales under company number 02361261. > Registered Office: University of the Arts London, 272 High Holborn, London > WC1V 7EY > > _______________________________________________ > > Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org > > [email protected] > > https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha > _______________________________________________ > Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org > [email protected] > https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha > _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org [email protected] https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
