>From: "james-tait" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>SINN FEIN NEWS
>
>>     IRISH NEWS ROUND-UP
>>     http://irlnet.com/rmlist/
>>
>>     Sunday-Tuesday, 7-9 May, 2000
>>
>>
>> 1.  BRITISH ARMY BASES TO GO
>> 2.  Unionist demands could undo arms deal
>> 3.  New wave of scandal in corruption investigation
>> 4.  Bloody Sunday tribunal resumes
>> 5.  O'Neill verdict to be appealed
>> 6.  UN supports ex-prisoners' freedom of expression
>> 7.  Dubliners reject anti-social behaviour
>> 8.  Funeral oration for Kieran Nugent
>> 9.  Analysis: Remembering the Hunger Strikers
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> >>>>>> BRITISH ARMY BASES TO GO
>>
>>
>>  In an initial British response to the IRA's initiative on
>>  Saturday, the British military has announced the demilitarisation
>>  of some of its fortresses and spy-towers in the North of Ireland.
>>
>>  Two British Army bases, in Derry and another in Cookstown, County
>>  Tyrone, are to be shut.   In addition, spy posts on top of
>>  high-rise buildings at Broadway and New Lodge in west and north
>>  Belfast, and a spy tower installation at Cloghogue close to the
>>  border near Newry will also go.
>>
>>  A huge military installation in the middle of republican
>>  Crossmaglen, south Armagh is also to be demolished within the
>>  next three months, "subject to continuing reduction in the level
>>  of threat", according to RUC Chief Ronnie Flanagan.
>>
>>  The demilitarisation moves are part of the carefully worked out
>>  sequence agreed in recent negotiations to overcome the
>>  disarmament hurdle and fully implement the Good Friday Agreement.
>>
>>  Sinn Fein North Belfast Assemblyman Gerry Kelly called for
>>  further rapid progress on demilitarisation.
>>
>>  "The announcement is to be welcomed. This decision is however
>>  long overdue," he said. "The process of demilitarisation should
>>  have begun immediately after the signing of the Good Friday
>>  Agreement.
>>
>>  "Sinn Fein has consistently pressed the British government to
>>  honour its commitments on demilitarisation for the past two
>>  years. This was obviously a key issue for us in the recent round
>>  of negotiations."
>>
>>  Flanagan indicated that there could be further demilitarisation
>>  in the months ahead, following another "review" in three months.
>>
>>  British Direct Ruler Peter Mandelson, welcomed the move and said
>>  he hoped that "contributions on the ground will enable us safely
>>  to make further changes in due course".
>>
>>  Sinn Fein's Mis-Ulster MP, Martin McGuinness, said if the
>>  demilitarisation programme was carried out diligently it would
>>  "help create the conditions in which we can demonstrate that
>>  politics work".
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> >>>>>> Unionist demands could undo arms deal
>>
>>
>>  Concern is growing that unionist efforts to win new concessions
>>  on policing and symbols in the North of Ireland could yet unravel
>>  last weekend's breakthrough agreement aimed at restoring the
>>  North's power-sharing institutions by May 22nd.
>>
>>  Elements of the Patten proposals for policing reform have been
>>  targeted by unionist negotiators, who want to retain a
>>  symbolically imperial name, crest and badges for the new force.
>>
>>  In particular, a proposal that the new policing service becalled
>>  the Police Service for Northern Ireland is the focus of intense
>>  resistance, who want the "Royal" designation retained.
>>
>>  Unionists are also seeking a commitment that the British Union
>>  Jack will continue to be flown over government buildings,
>>  including the buildings which house the Belfast Assembly and
>>  power-sharing Executive.
>>
>>  Sinn Fein Vice-President, Mr Pat Doherty, said that any
>>  "tampering" with the Patten repoirt was "a recipe for disaster".
>>
>>  "Sinn Fein will oppose, tooth and nail, any attempt to dilute
>>  Patten.  The Patten proposals on policing must be implemented in
>>  full," he said.
>>
>>  He was speaking as the Sinn Fein Ard Chomhairle met in Dublin
>>  today to consider last weekend's statements by the two
>>  governments and the IRA.
>>
>>  Welcoming the statements, the SF Ard Chomhairle said that there
>>  was "considerable unease" among republicans about attempts to
>>  dilute the Patten proposals on policing.
>>
>>  Mr Doherty said that the issue of the Patten report was being
>>  used to block progress at a time when there was a "very positive
>>  and upbeat mood" among people about the peace process.
>>
>>  "As far as Sinn Fein and republicans are concerned, Patten does
>>  not go far enough in the first place.  We need to establish a
>>  non-partisan, non-political police service that nationalists and
>>  republicans can recommend young nationalists to join and that
>>  will serve the entire community."
>>
>>  He added that Sinn Fein was expecting "early and comprehensive"
>>  developments  in the areas of the governments' weekend pledges on
>>  equality,  human rights, supporting the families of all the
>>  victims of the conflict, demilitarisation, the Irish language and
>>  a new police service and justice.
>>
>>  But the most vocal critic of the Good Friday Agreement, DUP
>>  leader Ian Paisley, described the arms deal as the "latest scam
>>  to help the IRA off the hook of decommissioning". The Ulster
>>  Unionist MP for West Tyrone,  William Thompson, said the IRA
>>  would still have control over some arms dumps despite the
>>  appointment of independent arms inspectors.
>>
>>  "The IRA have offered to secure a number of arms dumps, but there
>>  is nothing to suggest that means all of them. They can still
>>  control and supervise dumps.
>>
>>  "David Trimble claimed he must have certainty that actual
>>  decommissioning would happen before he went back into government.
>>  There is no certainty here," Mr Thompson insisted.
>>
>>  But despite the bickering, there was still confidence that the
>>  Ulster Unionist Party will give its backing to Trimble at the
>>  meeting on Saturday week if, as expected, he does decide to
>>  endorse the Hillsborough proposals. UUP Deputy Leader John Taylor
>>  yesterday predicted they would be strongly carried by the
>>  860-member council, the party's governing body.
>>
>>  "There are still some hiccups, but I think they will be
>>  overcome," he told BBC Radio. "It will go to the Ulster Unionist
>>  Council meeting and if this goes the way I personally foresee it
>>  going, I believe it would be approved strongly by the council,"
>>  Mr Taylor added.
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> >>>>>> New wave of scandal in corruption investigation
>>
>>
>>  Up to 30 Dublin representatives of the larger political parties
>>  and 14 developers were implicated in a widespread network of
>>  corruption by lobbyist and bagman Frank Dunlop in dramatic
>>  evidence yesterday at the Flood Tribunal into local government
>>  corruption.
>>
>>  One politician is still receiving payments for his support for
>>  lucrative planning permission and has received over #100,000
>>  during the 1990s. A further #250,000 in bribes has still to be
>>  accounted for.
>>
>>  In a day of shock disclosures, Mr Dunlop revealed that he had
>>  paid out almost #50,000 to 14 politicians in late 1992. Three of
>>  those elected representatives already feature on a list of 15
>>  councillors who received a total of #112,000 from Mr Dunlop for
>>  their support on the controversial Quarryvale development site in
>>  west Dublin a year earlier.
>>
>>  In addition to these two lists, Mr Dunlop paid bribes to another
>>  eight politicians after 1993, totalling at least #23,000.
>>
>>  Mr Dunlop described some politicians as insatiable in their
>>  appetite for bribes, while others muscled in on re-zoning
>>  proposals simply for the excuse to look for money.
>>
>>  "It was indicated to me that it would be helpful if I was
>>  generous," Mr Dunlop said in describing how one councillor sought
>>  a bribe.
>>
>>  The secret ties between property developers and councillors
>>  unravelled further yesterday as the former Government press
>>  secretary claimed that he had also received a total of #184,000
>>  from 14 different landowners in the period 1991-1993.
>>
>>  These payments, ranging from #5,000 to #30,000, were used as a
>>  "war chest" to secure the support of politicians for rezoning
>>  motions in Dublin County Council.
>>
>>  The witness said he would have to use the "road map" of hundreds
>>  of rezoning motions linked to the 1993 Development Plan of Dublin
>>  County Council to ensure he did not omit any payments to
>>  politicians.
>>
>>  Mr Dunlop told the packed auditorium at Dublin Castle that a
>>  number of politicians named on the lists had attempted to contact
>>  him since his previous appearance at the Tribunal. One of the
>>  callers had phoned his home in Dunboyne, Co. Meath, within
>>  minutes of him arriving back from the planning inquiry in April.
>>
>>  Mr Dunlop said he believed one of the individuals had been
>>  responsible for a rumour that he would not be appearing at the
>>  Tribunal yesterday. Asked by Patrick Hanratty SC for the
>>  Tribunal, if remarks this man made could be considered a threat,
>>  Mr Dunlop replied: "I have been around too long now to interpret
>>  things as threats. I just took it as typical."
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> >>>>>> Bloody Sunday tribunal resumes
>>
>>
>>  The IRA arms initiative on Saturday has cast a new light on the
>>  forthcoming testimony of British soldiers to the Bloody Sunday
>>  tribunal, which resumed on Monday in Derry's Guildhall.
>>
>>  At the outset of the resumed hearings, Lord Gifford QC,
>>  representing the family of James Wray, who was shot dead on
>>  Bloody Sunday, urged soldiers and former soldiers to change their
>>  attitude to the inquiry in the light of "the historic events" of
>>  the last few days.
>>
>>  He questioned the demand of British military personnel and their
>>  representatives to give their evidence anonymously in a location
>>  other than Derr.
>>
>>  The latest events offered a real prospect of a breakthrough in
>>  the peace process, he said.
>>
>>  "I feel that we . . . who take part in this process of the
>>  tribunal and the inquiry are part of the peace process, for the
>>  inquiry is dealing with one of the root causes of the conflict
>>  and we have a duty to do what we can to promote truth and
>>  reconciliation over Bloody Sunday."
>>
>>  If events proceeded towards a peaceful resolution, "the concerns
>>  of the soldiers for their safety may well be much reduced in a
>>  new security situation", he said.
>>
>>  At the tribunal today, a tape was played of the confused military
>>  communications on the day of the killing of 14 unarmed civil
>>  rights demonstrators.
>>
>>  One communication claimed that a number of civilian casualties
>>  has resulted from a "firefight" at Rossville flats in the
>>  nationalist Bogside of Derry. A British soldier reported "two
>>  high velocity shots heard in the area of Free ... er, the
>>  Rossville Flats. People are lying on the ground now there".
>>
>>  Another communication reported shooting a "gunman" at the Bogside
>>  Inn, according to a transcript referred to by counsel to the
>>  inquiry, Christopher Clarke QC.
>>
>>  It said: "Hello, Zero, this is 65. Sitrep boils down to the fact
>>  that the two sub units moved in, ah, got involved in a firefight,
>>  the ah, shots appearing to have come from the area of Rossville
>>  flats. The two sub units have now gone secure in that area. Ah
>>  two civilians are lying wounded or dead, we are not sure yet, in
>>  the area of Chamberlain Street. Who shot them we don't know.
>>  Over."
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> >>>>>> O'Neill verdict to be appealed
>>
>>  The family of Volunteer Diarmuid O'Neill confirmed on Tuesday
>>  that they intend to appeal the verdict of lawful killing returned
>>  by a jury at Kingston Coroner's Court in February. Human rights
>>  solicitor Gareth Pierce is to act on their behalf, and it is
>>  believed that barrister Michael Mansfield QC has also agreed to
>>  be included in the legal team. Both represented the family at the
>>  original inquest.
>>
>>  The verdict of lawful killing caused bitter disappointment and
>>  anger amongst those campaigning for an independent inquiry into
>>  Diarmuid's killing, which bore all the hallmarks of a
>>  shoot-to-kill operation. Despite initial claims by the police
>>  that the shooting was a "tragic mistake", once in court the
>>  officers of the Metropolitan Police maintained that they in fact
>>  considered the operation to be a complete success and insisted
>>  that they would do the same again in similar circumstances.
>>
>>  The conduct of the Coroner, Dr John Burton, also caused
>>  controversy. Dr Burton, who last autumn wrote to the Home Office
>>  calling for an inquiry into the killing, specifically requested
>>  permission to conduct the inquest, although he was due to retire
>>  before it opened. As the jury was about to retire to consider its
>>  verdict, Dr Burton made an unprecedented intervention, apparently
>>  setting aside the evidence and telling the jury that a verdict of
>>  lawful killing would suggest implicit support for the cause for
>>  which Diarmuid fought and turn him into a martyr. He also drew
>>  the jury's attention to the fact that Michael Mansfield is listed
>>  as a supporter on the Justice for Diarmuid O'Neill campaign
>>  letterhead.
>>
>>  Diarmuid's father, Eoghan, said that after having given many
>>  hours of thought to their decision the family had finally "come
>>  to the conclusion that we could not leave it. It would seem as
>>  though we accept what happened to Diarmuid. The result of the
>>  inquest was horrible and what the coroner said was outrageous. He
>>  basically directed the jury to return that verdict. When he told
>>  them not to make a martyr of Diarmuid, it was a totally political
>>  comment".
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> >>>>>> UN supports ex-prisoners' freedom of expression
>>
>>  A United Nations report on freedom of expression has endorsed
>>  complaints against the British Broadcasting Corporation initiated
>>  by the republican ex prisoners co ordinating group Coiste na
>>  n-Iarchimi.
>>
>>  A report submitted by Special Rapporteur Abid Hussain to the UN
>>  Commission on Human Rights accuses the BBC of bias and criticises
>>  the corporation's attitude towards ex prisoners which it says
>>  inhibits reconciliation within the North of Ireland.
>>
>>  The report went on to call on the British government to scrap
>>  emergency legislation, ban the use of plastic bullets, stop the
>>  use of excessive force against peaceful demonstrators, publish
>>  the Stalker-Sampson inquiry and the Stevens' report and guarantee
>>  the rights of others are not violated in the exercise of the
>>  right to assemble and march.
>>
>>  Commenting on the specific issue of freedom of expression for ex
>>  prisoners Coiste spokesperson and former republican POW Laurence
>>  McKeown said, "the BBC are living in the past, they're out of
>>  step with the current peace process and the responsibilities of
>>  conflict resolution."
>>
>>  In January 1999 during a press conference launch of Coiste na
>>  n-Iarchimi a BBC film and radio crew interviewed, at their own
>>  request, three republican ex prisoners who had been recently
>>  released under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement.
>>
>>  The former prisoners spoke of their hopes and fears for the
>>  future and the difficulties of reintegration. All three supported
>>  the Good Friday Agreement and the self help ethos of the
>>  Coiste.
>>
>>  The establishment of the Coiste, which represents 20 local groups
>>  and projects run by and for republican ex prisoners, was a
>>  significant development towards peace and reconciliation.
>>
>>  It is estimated that 15,000 republicans have experienced
>>  imprisonment during the last 30 years of conflict. Clearly the
>>  launch of the Coiste was an important media event which should
>>  have commanded coverage on local television and radio.
>>
>>  Yet coverage of the launch and the interviews of the three ex
>>  prisoners were never broadcast by the BBC. Although Radio Ulster
>>  indicated on air at 12 noon that there would be a report on the
>>  one o'clock news, when the programme was broadcast there was no
>>  mention of the launch.
>>
>>  According to a newspaper report at the time, the BBC had "pulled
>>  a planned radio item about the launch of a prisoner' rights group
>>  an hour before transmission...The BBC says it stopped the
>>  broadcast as it did not have enough opportunity or time to
>>  consult with the relatives of the victims."
>>
>>  Following a formal complaint by Coiste Director Mike Ritchie, the
>>  BBC cited guidelines drawn up by the corporation to deal with
>>  interviews with former and serving prisoners "BBC NI has reported
>>  fully the debate surrounding the release of paramilitary
>>  prisoners and their future in this society and will continue to
>>  do so in a fair and comprehensive manner," replied radio news
>>  editor Kathleen Carragher.
>>
>>  "The guidelines cited by the BBC are geared towards dealing with
>>  interviews of criminals in England and as such are totally
>>  inappropriate for dealing with people imprisoned as a result of
>>  political conflict in the North of Ireland," says Laurence.
>>
>>  In response the Coiste described the guidelines as offensive to
>>  their clients. "A large element of the conflict concerned
>>  attempts by the British state to criminalise the republican
>>  perspective in general and republican prisoners in particular.
>>  From our point of view , dealing with political prisoners as if
>>  they are criminals is to abandon neutrality concerning the nature
>>  of the conflict."
>>
>>  In a submission to UN Special Rapporteur Abid Hussain, the Coiste
>>  pointed out that the BBC's guidelines "are problematic in that
>>  they make no distinction between criminal and political
>>  convictions."  The Coiste pointed out that there was a danger
>>  that ex prisoners "will continue to be defined in media terms in
>>  relation to their victims rather than in their own right.
>>
>>  "Particularly in relation to a transition from conflict, this is
>>  unhelpful to our overall project of reintegration and
>>  reconciliation. Indeed it could be argued that such an approach
>>  has been deeply undermining of the spirit of the Good Friday
>>  Agreement which was overwhelmingly endorsed by the people of
>>  Ireland."
>>
>>  But it was Dr David Miller of the Stirling Media Research
>>  Institute who pointed out the BBC's hypocrisy. In a letter to
>>  Andrew Coleman, the head of news and current affairs of the BBC
>>  in the Six Counties, Miller asked why interviews with Irish
>>  republican ex prisoners should be governed by guidelines drawn up
>>  to deal with criminals.
>>
>>  Miller pointed out that there was a section within the guidelines
>>  which states "interviewing political dissidents and activists is
>>  an important part of providing a full  understanding of events."
>>  The BBC's implementation of the guidelines was not only
>>  inappropriate it was arguably duplicitous.
>>
>>  "Are there any occasions on which you have informed victims of
>>  the security forces when interviewing them. Have BBC journalists,
>>  for example, consistently informed Karen Reilly's parents before
>>  an interview with Lee Clegg was broadcast?"
>>
>>  Of course they had not. In a submission to the UN Special
>>  Rapporteur, Miller points out that the "different standards which
>>  are applied to individuals or groups is dependent not on their
>>  actions but on which side they are." Miller cites the example of
>>  Lee Clegg and accused the BBC of double standards.
>>
>>  But behind this is an even bigger issue said Miller. "Although
>>  British forces have been responsible for a large number of
>>  civilian and paramilitary deaths in the conflict less than ten
>>  have been jailed for murders committed while on duty.
>>
>>  "This does mean that the operation of the justice system in
>>  Northern Ireland tends to further disadvantage those who are
>>  imprisoned in the sense that they are disproportionately regarded
>>  as criminals."
>>
>>  Miller points out that the censorship of republicans ex prisoners
>>  comes within the context of a wider suppression of the truth by
>>  the British state. Miller cites a number of examples.
>>
>>  Tony Geraghty, journalist and author arrested in relation to his
>>  book "The Irish War".  Attempts to interfere with a book written
>>  by Jack Holland about the covert actions of an RUC Intelligence
>>  operative killed on the Mull of Kintyre.
>>
>>  Court action against Tribune journalist Ed Moloney after an
>>  interview with an RUC Special Branch agent William Stobie, which
>>  implicated the RUC in the murder of Pat Finucane, was
>>  published.
>>
>>  The imposition of a gagging order on the Sunday Times following
>>  revelations about the British army's covert Force Research Unit
>>  and attempts by the British army to destroy evidence gathered by
>


__________________________________

KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki - Finland
+358-40-7177941, fax +358-9-7591081
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kominf.pp.fi

___________________________________

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe/unsubscribe messages
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________


Reply via email to