>Date: 24 May 2000 11:49:45 -0000

>
>STOP NATO: NO PASARAN! - HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.COM
>
>Date sent:              24 May 2000 06:06:34 -0000
>To:                     RCPB(ML) WDIE Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From:                   "RCPB(ML)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject:                WORKERS' DAILY INTERNET EDITION Year 2000 No. 88, May
>24
>
>==================================================================
>The following message was received at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>and is being forwarded automatically to you.
>==================================================================
>
>WORKERS' DAILY INTERNET EDITION Year 2000 No. 88, May 24 (Text)
>Daily On Line Newspaper of the Revolutionary Communist Party of Britain
>(Marxist-Leninist)
>170, Wandsworth Road, London, SW8 2LA. Phone 020 762 70599
>Web Site: http://www.rcpbml.org.uk
>e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Workers' Daily Internet Edition Year 2000 No.88 can be viewed at:
>http://www.rcpbml.org.uk/ww2000/d00-88.htm
>
>Article Index :
>
>1) British Government���s Criminal Involvement in Sierra Leone
>
>2) British and US Warplanes Continue to Bomb Iraq
>
>3) Disabled People March For Freedoms
>
>4) Reclaim Life! Action on Human Genetics
>
>5) For a Reunified and Independent Korea
>
>6) Florence Says No to the NATO Summit!
>
>
>Subscription Rates (Cheques made payable to Workers' Publication
>Centre):
>Workers' Weekly Printed Edition: 70p per issue, #2.70 for 4 issues, #17
>for 26 issues, #32 for 52 issues (including postage)
>Workers' Daily Internet Edition sent by e-mail daily (Text e-mail ): 1
>issue free, 6 months #5, Yearly #10
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>1) British Government���s Criminal Involvement in Sierra Leone
>
>According to the statement made by the Defence Secretary, Geoffrey Hoon,
>on May 23, one of the British government���s main long term aims in Sierra
>Leone is to make sure that the government of Sierra Leone is in control
>of the diamond producing areas of the country.
>
>In order to realise this aim, the British government is taking measures
>to make sure that the government of Ahmad Tejan Kabbah, which was
>originally brought to power with British military assistance, has the
>necessary means to remain in power. To this end the Defence Secretary
>announced that a British-dominated International Military Assistance
>Training Team will soon arrive in Sierra Leone, to build what he
>referred to as "a new effective and democratically accountable Armed
>Forces and Military of Defence". At the same time it was also announced
>that the British government will be supplying this new army with "stocks
>of light weapons and ammunition" and that these will be "under the
>supervision of British officers". Geoffrey Hoon concluded by stating
>"what we are now setting in place are the arrangements for our
>continuing support to the Government of Sierra Leone."
>
>But he might have added that these are precisely the arrangements for
>Britain to continue to interfere in the affairs of Sierra Leone and
>indeed provide the pretext to intervene more widely throughout the
>region. Through these "arrangements" the British government will
>continue to intervene in Sierra Leone���s internal affairs and bolster its
>armed forces as a means to facilitate continued interference in the
>economic and political life of a country that became Britain���s first
>colony in Africa nearly two centuries ago. Hoon���s statement also makes
>it clear that the government���s main concern in Sierra Leone is the
>control of that country���s great mineral wealth. Sierra Leone is one of
>the world���s leading diamond producers and in the past British monopolies
>such as De Beers and BP have both sought a stake in this profitable
>field.
>
>Britain���s intervention in Sierra Leone is continually presented as one
>of "humanitarian concern" undertaken for the worthiest of motives. But
>not only is there no mandate for such interference in the affairs of a
>sovereign country. The fact is that Britain has been and is involved up
>to the hilt in creating these tragic situations which it then utilises
>as pretexts to intervene from some high moral pedestal. Its foreign
>policy is one of "enlightened self-interest", and the pursuit of
>"universal values", under which it pursues its geo-political interests
>and the interests of the monopolies. For this there is and can be no
>justification.
>
>What is becoming clearer is that British intervention is undertaken for
>the most sordid of motives and far from being brought to an end, as the
>government claims, is daily being made more permanent. The government is
>fully engaged in a new "Scramble for Africa" and is putting into place
>arrangements that will allow it to continue to interfere in its former
>colonies and throughout Africa in the interest of the monopolies. This
>criminal interference must be condemned.
>
>End Item
>
>
>
>
>
>2) British and US Warplanes Continue to Bomb Iraq
>
>British and US warplanes are continuing their criminal and inhuman
>bombing of Iraq on practically a daily basis.
>
>On Monday, May 22, they attacked Iraqi sites in the north and south. The
>US, as is customary, claimed that these were military sites and that
>their aircraft had come under Iraqi anti-aircraft artillery fire in the
>no-fly zones.
>
>The "no-fly zones" are completely unauthorised in any international
>forum or by international law, and Iraq justly does not recognise these
>zones.
>
>Recently Iraq has asked the Arab League to exert pressure on Britain and
>the US to stop this aggression. The Foreign Minister of Iraq has pointed
>out that between May 8-14 for example, British and US planes carried out
>12 armed sorties from bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. In addition,
>some 40 British and US planes are based at Incirlik in Turkey to patrol
>the northern "no-fly zone".
>
>End Item
>
>
>
>
>3) Disabled People March For Freedoms
>
>The Disabled People���s Direct Action Network (DAN) is organising its 12th
>National Action from Thursday, May 25, in Newcastle-upon-Tyne. The
>action will culminate with a march on Saturday, May 27, starting at the
>Monument, Newcastle at 12 noon. The organisers say that they will be
>aiming their action at government and local authorities and putting
>forward several demands.
>
>In a leaflet issued by DAN they point out that disabled people will no
>longer accept living in institutions and that no more should people
>accept grandfathers and grandmothers being asked to sell their homes
>that they have worked for to be put into institutions. They call on the
>people of the North East to march for all their freedoms, those that are
>disabled and those yet to become disabled. The leaflet puts forward a
>demand for affordable accessible housing and services run by disabled
>people which give everyone the choice to live in their own home. DAN
>points out: "We want everyone to receive the assistance they need when
>they need it, how they need it." The leaflet opposes the charges by
>local authorities for services to disabled people and demands an end to
>all the barbarian practices of the ruling circles towards disabled
>people.
>
>End Item
>
>
>
>
>4) Reclaim Life!
>
>Action on Human Genetics
>
>International Centre for Life
>Saturday, May 27, 10.00 am
>
>A protest has been organised to coincide with the opening of the Life
>visitors attraction at the International Centre for Life in Newcastle.
>The rationale behind the action is that this Disneyesque visitors
>attraction has been created to represent the interests of the biotech
>global monopolies and is aimed at spreading disinformation to demobilise
>people to the dangers that these monopolies are creating in the field of
>genetics.
>
>
>End Item
>
>
>
>
>5) For a Reunified and Independent Korea
>
>The May 2000 Bulletin of CILRECO, "For a reunified and independent
>Korea", has been published. CILRECO is the International Liaison
>Committee for Reunification and Peace in Korea. We reproduce below the
>lead article: The Holding of A Historic Summit between the North and the
>South in Pyongyang Next June Raises Hope throughout the Korean Nation
>
>Following the invitation of the DPRK's leader Kim Jong Il, the President
>of South Korea, Kim Dae Jung, will be visiting Pyongyang from June 12 to
>14 for a meeting described by both parties concerned as historic.
>
>The goal of this summit, according to a joint communiqu��, is to
>encourage national reconciliation, unity, co-operation and exchange,
>peace and reunification. The entire Korean nation is extremely hopeful
>about this historic meeting, as are many governments who think that it
>might help putting an end to "the state of confrontation in Korea, that
>stems from the cold-war".
>
>CILRECO is very happy about this summit and hopes that it will be a
>decisive turning point in the relations between the North and the South,
>making way for the peaceful and independent reunification of Korea,
>which the Korean people have been longing for.
>
>CILRECO wishes that these hopes be fulfilled, and that the two parties
>concentrate during this meeting on the reunification of the country and
>peace in the peninsula, matters which are of vital importance to the
>Korean nation.
>
>That is why CILRECO regrets the launching of yet another defamatory
>media campaign against the DPRK, which started immediately after the
>announcement of the summit, and is packed with false information on the
>1950-1953 war and events and facts related to the relations between the
>North and the South and socialist Korea's reunification policy, all in
>order to substantiate the thesis according to which the DPRK is to blame
>if the talks fail.
>
>The real question is not to forecast whether the North or the South
>would benefit from this meeting, where there would be no winners or
>losers, but to do everything possible to have the one and only winner:
>the Korean nation.
>
>The goals of this campaign are obvious, insofar as it serves the
>interests of those who are hostile to the sovereign reunification of
>Korea, because it would call in question their strategy of hegemony in
>the region.
>
>On the eve of this summit, more than ever before, all progressive and
>peace-loving forces must be vigilant and active, and demand a positive
>outcome in the interest of the Korean nation, international security and
>peace in the region.
>
>End Item
>
>
>
>
>6) Florence Says No to the NATO Summit!
>
>WDIE has received the following information on the NATO summit.
>
>On May 24 and 25, NATO will hold a summit meeting in Florence, a city
>declared to be an "Operator for Peace", with a gold medal for its
>Resistance against the Nazi/Fascists in World War II.
>
>In this highest-level meeting, the NATO Alliance intends to further
>define its strategies with regards to various areas of the world (the
>Balkans and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, North Africa), the
>reorganisation in a more explicitly offensive way of its military
>apparatus, and its expansion to the East.
>
>The NATO military alliance which, as in the past, continues to be an
>instrument of aggression against national sovereignty and of
>interference in the internal political affairs of member states, as well
>as a constant threat to peace, is today in a process of transformation
>of its role and its military apparatus to adapt itself to the growing
>requirements of capitalist dominion in its contemporary form: "the free
>market."
>
>It is in this sense that the Treaty of Washington of April 1999, also
>signed by the Italian government, must be understood, in which NATO
>formally arrogates to itself the right to intervene everywhere and
>anywhere in support of the new world order, as demonstrated in the war
>against Yugoslavia.
>
>War is thus established and increasingly reconfirmed as a concrete
>possibility, practicable and in fact practised, as a major and decisive
>instrument for the imposition of the "free market."
>
>For this reason there is an evident connection between the struggles
>against wars of aggression, against the presence of NATO's military
>bases, against militarism, and against the embargoes, with the struggles
>in the North and South of the world which are rising up against the
>sanctuaries of capitalism (WTO, IMF, World Bank), against temporary
>labour and "flexibility", against exploitation and poverty, for social
>and citizenship rights, for the right to a decent life and future, for
>the liberation of peoples.
>
>The forces organising this mobilisation express their opposition to the
>holding of the NATO summit in Florence and call on the entire population
>to boycott and mobilise against this unacceptable provocation.
>
>WEDNESDAY 24 MAY
>
>DAY OF MOBILIZATION AGAINST NATO
>
>concluding with a DEMONSTRATION
>meeting point: PIAZZA SAN MARCO
>
>5:30 p.m.
>
>
>End Item
>--
>To contact RCPB(ML) by e-mail:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>RCPB(ML) Home Page: http://www.rcpbml.org.uk
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>______________________________________________________________________
>Advertisement:
>15% off Ashford Collection jewelry for Mother's Day! Mom will love
>these gorgeous pieces handpicked by our expert jewelry buyers - now
>15% off and shipped FedEx overnight FREE! Spoiled as a child? Return
>the favor - get her gift at Ashford.com.
>http://on.linkexchange.com/?ATID=27&AID=1231
>
>


__________________________________

KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki - Finland
+358-40-7177941, fax +358-9-7591081
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kominf.pp.fi

___________________________________

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe/unsubscribe messages
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________


Reply via email to