> Korean summit undercuts 'Star Wars'
>
> By Tim Wheeler - People's Weekly World
>
> The June 12 meeting of the two Korean presidents in Pyongyang, capital of
the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), was greeted by peace
organizations as a step toward ending the 50-year confrontation on the
peninsula.
>
> The meeting also countered Clinton administration claims that the U.S.
needs an anti-missile system to defend against the DPRK, which it brands a
"rogue nation."
>
> DPRK President Kim Il shook hands with South Korean President Kim Dae Jung
during a welcoming ceremony at the Pyongyang airport June 12.
>
> Kim Jong Il has unleashed a diplomatic offensive to strengthen the DPRK's
relations with countries around the world. He recently visited Beijing.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is set to visit Pyongyang this month,
rebuffing Clinton Administration attempts to deploy a ballistic missile
defense (BMD) in violation of the 1972 ABM Treaty.
>
> Joe Volk, executive director of the American Friends Service Committee,
said, "This meeting is a very good initiative. What we need on the Korean
peninsula is an end to the Cold War through threat reduction, confidence
building and identifying areas of cooperation between the north and the
south. It might lead to mutual security and in the not too distant future
reunification of Korea"
>
> He added, "We doubt very much if North Korea poses a real threat to U.S.
security that justifies spending billions of dollars for an anti-missile
system."
>
> Kim Dae Jung served prison terms under successive right-wing regimes in
Seoul. A worldwide movement, joined by the DPRK, forced the regime to free
him.
>
> South Korean trade with the DPRK, which was zero in 1989 reached $333
million in 1999. As of April 7, some 210,000 people from South Korea had
visited Mount Kumgang (Diamond Mountain) in the DPRK, among the most
beautiful peaks in the world and revered as a symbol of Korean unification.
>
> The summit of the "two Kims" comes during a period of agonizing
reappraisal of the role of the U.S. in the Korean War. The Pentagon is
attempting to discredit an Associated Press report buttressed by
eyewitnesses that U.S. soldiers massacred unarmed Koreans whom they had
herded under the No Gun Ri bridge. The DPRK's Korean Central News Agency
released a report on the history of the Korean War reminding readers that
the Pentagon, and Gen. Douglas MacArthur, had schemed to escalate the Korean
War into World War III by crossing the Yalu River.
>
> The plan was to draw People's China and the Soviet Union into the war and
then retaliate with nuclear weapons. I.F. Stone provides massive
documentation of this plan in his "Hidden History of the Korean War." Half a
century later, the U.S. still deploys 40,000 troops and hundreds of nuclear
weapons in South Korea.
>
> Mary Day Kent, executive director of the U.S. Section of the Women's
International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF), told the World that her
group favors negotiations to end the Korean War, "which has been going on
for decades."
>
> The South Korean section of WILPF "is very concerned about human rights
issues in South Korea and also about the process of renegotiation of the
'Status of Forces Agreement.' This is an indication that the U.S. plans to
maintain its military forces in Korea into the future", she said. We are
extremely concerned and opposed to the revival of an anti-ballistic missile
proposal, which is both destabilizing and ineffective."
>
> Bruce Gagnon, coordinator of the Global Network Against Nuclear Weapons
and Power in Space, told the World, "There is a fresh breeze blowing. It
runs counter to the claim that North Korea is ready to launch a nuclear
attack against the rest of the world."
>
> He accused the CIA of attempting to whip up hysteria against North Korea.
"They have revised their estimates on how long it would take the North
Koreans to develop an intercontinental ballistic missile to justify
immediate deployment of Star Wars. This has been a fabrication from the
start."
>
> President Clinton is under mounting pressure to reject the new version of
Star Wars. On June 12, 33 eminent scholars of U.S.-Russian relations sent a
letter to Clinton initiated by the Council for a Livable World.
>
> "We believe the current plans for the National Missile Defense program may
undermine U.S. security and further aggravate U.S. relations with Russia,"
the letter warned. "We urge you not to endorse deployment at this time."
>
> Signers include Timothy Colton and Marshall Goldman, leading Russia
scholars at Harvard; Arthur Hartman, former Ambassador to the Soviet Union,
and John Steinbruner, an arms control expert.
>
> Meanwhile, 46 physicists and engineers, organized by the Union of
Concerned Scientists, told Congress that the Star Wars scheme should be
shelved.
>
> "What's on the books at this point is simply not adequate and never will
be," said Lawrence Jones, a physicist at the University of Michigan in Ann
Arbor.
>
> The scientists charged that the Pentagon has deliberately "simplified"
tests in hopes of proving that the anti-missile missile can pick out the
real incoming missile from thousands of tin-foil decoys. Not one test has
succeeded.
>
>
>
> --- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
