>        WW News Service Digest #115
>
> 1) Thousands hit U.S. trade schemes at OAS meeting
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 2) UNICEF on child poverty: U.S. worse than 27 other countries
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 3) Cuba is catching up to U.S. in healthy life span
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 4) Family, comrades, co-workers say farewell to Key Martin
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the June 22, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>PROTESTS IN WINDSOR, ONT.:
>THOUSANDS HIT U.S. TRADE SCHEMES AT OAS MEETING
>
>By Mark Marzolf
>Detroit
>
>Thousands demonstrated international working-class
>solidarity in protests at the U.S.-Canadian border here
>June 4. Their target was the Organization of American
>States General Assembly meetings that began the same day in
>Windsor, Ontario.
>
>Labor unionists rallied with young activists in an attempt
>to shut down the U.S.-dominated OAS meetings. The protests
>focused on the organization's role in the economic
>restructuring of the globe to serve the imperialist and
>corporate interests of the United States.
>
>Five thousand demonstrators rallied around the convention
>center, site of the OAS meeting in Windsor. At the same
>time another 500 marched across the river in Detroit.
>
>The protests demanded that so-called free-trade policies
>be abolished, and an end to the agenda the OAS pursues--
>undermining workers throughout the hemisphere.
>
>At the forefront of the OAS meetings was a discussion of
>implementing the Free Trade Area of the Americas by the
>year 2005. As the extension of NAFTA, the FTAA aims to
>consolidate the entire Western Hemisphere into one "free
>trade" zone through "economic unification."
>
>The FTAA--like similar World Trade Organization and
>International Monetary Fund policies--is yet another
>extension of U.S. imperialist domination. It declares war
>on the poor and working class for the gains of corporate
>capital, takes over the domestic markets of less
>industrialized countries and destroys organized labor
>forces.
>
>"The corporations have their global links with
>institutions like the WTO, IMF and OAS in privatizing
>everything, taking away our self-determination," said a
>member of the Canadian Auto Workers. "As their agendas
>increase globally, so must ours. Workers must fight for
>each other."
>
>The CAW joined members of the U.S. and Canadian steel
>workers' unions, Service Employees, Ontario public
>employees, locked-out Detroit newspaper workers, and many
>other unions in the battle against the OAS and the
>imposition of the FTAA.
>
>Drug trafficking was also listed as a topic on the agenda
>of the OAS meetings in Windsor. In reality the United
>States has used this as a cover for the Pentagon to
>militarize regions of Latin America. In particular
>Washington has used the pretext of a "drug war" to
>intervene in what is really a war to crush the growing
>armed popular insurgency in Colombia.
>
>`WHOSE STREETS? OUR STREETS!'
>
>For weeks before the OAS meetings, newspapers ran scare
>articles on "security issues" about the upcoming protests.
>They invoked the Battle of Seattle, as though the
>protesters there had unleashed violence on the police.
>
>In fact, as is clear from documentary footage and
>eyewitness accounts, the violence in Seattle was a riot by
>the forces of the state against demonstrators.
>
>But law-enforcement agents used violence-baiting about the
>Seattle protests as an excuse to set the stage for their
>own repressive occupation of the U.S.-Canada border. They
>suspended the basic constitutional rights of anti-OAS
>protesters.
>
>Anti-OAS protesters were met with what residents and
>reporters from the two cities were calling a police state.
>
>Thousands of cops came from all over Ontario to beef up
>the Windsor police force. In Detroit the police outnumbered
>demonstrators four to one. The city of Detroit spent over
>$6 million on riot training and police overtime.
>
>Police helicopters and boats buzzed the border between
>Detroit and Windsor, monitoring the thousands of
>demonstrators. Field units of police were on every corner
>in downtown Windsor, creating an imposing presence in
>military-style outfitting and armored vehicles.
>
>Police in riot gear flanked the perimeters of the eight-
>foot-high fenced-in zone where delegates were meeting.
>Concrete barriers and steel fences cloistered the OAS
>delegates from the protesters, creating a fortress within
>which they could conduct their agenda.
>
>Police pepper-sprayed and clubbed several demonstrators
>with batons for attempting to hang a banner on the steel
>fence.
>
>Demonstrators marched through the heavily police-patrolled
>area, chanting in unison: "Whose streets? Our streets!"
>
>Representatives from the International Action Center
>joined the lead of the march carrying a banner demanding:
>"U.S. hands off Colombia! Money for jobs and human needs,
>not the Pentagon!"
>
>Twenty people were arrested for wearing masks--which the
>city council had outlawed just days before the protest. The
>law also banned hoods, squirt bottles, and any container
>used for transporting fuel--all in an effort to "assure
>that Detroit does not become another Seattle," one city
>council member claimed.
>
>Preparations to shut down the 2001 OAS conference in
>Quebec are already in the organizing stages.
>
>Christina Polsinelli of the International Action Center
>also contributed to this article.
>
>                         - END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service. Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message
>to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>Message-ID: <00c901bfdb1f$6654dd10$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WW]  UNICEF on child poverty: U.S. worse than 27 other countries
>Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 21:24:09 -0400
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>        charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the June 22, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>UNICEF ON CHILD POVERTY: U.S. WORSE THAN 27 OTHER COUNTRIES
>
>By Gary Wilson
>
>In the world's wealthiest countries, 47 million children
>are so poor that their health and well-being are in danger.
>This is the conclusion of a report released June 13 by the
>United Nations Children's Fund.
>
>That's one in six children in the 29 richest countries of
>the world.
>
>Of all the richest countries, the United States comes
>close to being the worst for children. Only Mexico--an
>oppressed country with a fraction of the wealth of the
>United States--has a higher percentage of children living
>in poverty, according to the UNICEF report.
>
>The report says there are 13.5 million children living in
>poverty in the United States--that's fully one-third of all
>the poor children in the wealthiest countries.
>
>The report questions the assumption that child poverty is
>linked to the overall strength of the economy.
>
>The United States has booming profits for the top
>corporations and bankers, with relatively high employment
>levels. However, the United States has virtually eliminated
>its "social safety net" and does not have a guaranteed
>income for those who cannot get jobs or can't work.
>
>There is a clear link between child poverty and households
>where no adults have an income, the report says. Only
>Britain ranks worse than the United States in this regard.
>
>The UNICEF study is another indicator of the extremes
>between the rich and the poor that have built up in the
>United States.
>
>The media hype about the booming economy has emphasized
>how the rich have gotten richer. The other side of this
>boom is that the poor have gotten really poorer.
>
>The UNICEF report does not break down the U.S. poverty
>figures by nationality. However, a 1997 Children's Defense
>Fund report showed that one of every two African American
>children lives in poverty, as do 30 percent of all Latino
>children in this country.
>
>POVERTY CAN BE ELIMINATED
>
>Child poverty could be virtually eliminated by
>establishing a guaranteed income for all.
>
>There are more than enough funds in the U.S. budget to do
>this.
>
>Add to this a program to build schools instead of jails,
>provide child care for all who need it, and raise the
>minimum wage to a union wage, and there would be no crisis
>of child poverty.
>
>However, the funds that could be used for this have been
>diverted to build up the military and engage in war.
>
>The 78-day war against Yugoslavia cost the U.S. people at
>least $4 billion, according to the Center for Strategic and
>Budgetary Assessments. These funds were directly diverted
>from essential domestic social programs. And yet they could
>have virtually eliminated child poverty.
>
>The U.S. government has the biggest military in the world-
>-bigger than the next 16 countries combined. The United
>States has bases in over 100 countries around the world.
>When it comes to military spending, there are almost no
>limits.
>
>Now President Bill Clinton is selling a new multi-billion-
>dollar "missile shield" plan that is a giveaway to the
>military. Some have called it a welfare program for the
>military-industrial complex.
>
>Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore supports
>Clinton's missile shield. Republican candidate George W.
>Bush supports a similar plan. Neither has an answer to
>child poverty.
>
>The military-industrial complex continues to call the
>shots in the bought-and-paid-for presidential elections in
>the United States.
>
>Capitalism has created the painful paradox of poverty amid
>enormous wealth. It takes going outside the capitalist
>political parties to fight for any real change.
>
>                         - END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service. Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message
>to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>Message-ID: <00cf01bfdb1f$7a4f4df0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WW]  Cuba is catching up to U.S. in healthy life span
>Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 21:24:43 -0400
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>        charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the June 22, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REPORT:
>
>CUBA IS CATCHING UP TO
>U.S. IN HEALTHY LIFE SPAN
>
>By Scott Scheffer
>
>An infant born in Cuba today will more than likely live a
>longer healthy life--68.4 years--than an infant born in a
>poor neighborhood in the United States, according to a June
>4 World Health Organization news release.
>
>Cuba has the best rating in all Latin America, the release
>notes, "despite decades of a U.S. trade embargo."
>
>Vietnam, another socialist country that has suffered great
>damage from the United States, "has been improving
>dramatically in health profiles and healthy life
>expectancy."
>
>The People's Republic of China, too, was commended for "a
>very impressive performance."
>
>But the capitalist United States-the richest country in
>the world--fell behind 23 other countries in healthy life
>expectancy.
>
>The release cited the results of a study that uses a new
>system to examine the state of health of each country's
>population. Called Disability Adjusted Life Expectancy, it
>calculates the expected years of a person's healthy life,
>as opposed to just life expectancy.
>
>Japan has the highest rating: 74.5 years. The next nine on
>the list are European countries.
>
>The WHO says the study revealed a wider gap between
>developing countries and rich industrialized countries than
>was expected. Generally speaking, the statistics showed a
>correlation between healthy life expectancy and how poor or
>rich a country is.
>
>Therefore, the failure of the United States to be rated in
>the top 10 is described as "one of the major surprises" of
>the WHO study. It is ranked 24th.
>
>WHAT GOOD IS TECHNOLOGY IF YOU CAN'T AFFORD IT?
>
>According to Dr. Christopher Murray, director of WHO's
>Global Program on Evidence for Health Policy, the wide gap
>between rich and poor people's access to health care has
>pulled the U.S. average way down.
>
>"The reason it is 24th is that there are groups that have
>been left out of the advances in health we have seen for
>most of the U.S. population for the last two or three
>decades," says Murray.
>
>The WHO release summarizing the study says more pointedly,
>"Some groups, such as Native Americans, rural African
>Americans and the inner city poor, have extremely poor
>health, more characteristic of a poor developing country
>rather than a rich industrialized one."
>
>The fact that the people of Cuba, China and Vietnam fare
>as well as--or in the case of Cuba better than--the poor
>people of the United States affirms that access to health
>care is a more important factor in health and longevity
>than the size of a country's economy. All three countries
>have made it a priority to spread good health the way U.S.
>capitalism spreads fast-food restaurants.
>
>The United States falls way behind even other rich
>capitalist countries. They have all instituted varying
>forms of national health care under the pressure of large,
>organized working-class movements, many of these movements
>led for decades by socialists and communists.
>
>Here, however, the health-care industry is dominated by
>giant insurance/hospital corporations. They defeated even
>the weak health-care initiative put forth in the first
>Clinton administration.
>
>If apologists for U.S. capitalism feel stung by the
>results of this report, more recent news will surely rub
>some salt in their wounds. The study's results were made
>public only days after a U.S. Congressional Black Caucus
>delegation visited Havana.
>
>There they were told by President Fidel Castro that Cuba
>would offer free medical training to U.S. students willing
>to commit to be physicians in poor neighborhoods back home.
>
>The latest WHO bulletin announces the inaugural conference
>of the International Society for Equity in Health. This
>conference will be held in Havana on June 29-30, and it is
>another indicator of how serious Cuba is about promoting
>health care.
>
>The fact that three socialist countries, all struggling
>against aggression by U.S. imperialism, have provided
>health care for their populations in such an impressive way
>gives working-class and oppressed people hope. It heralds a
>day when people's ownership along with centralized planning
>will be the basis for wiping out hunger and disease
>worldwide.
>
>                         - END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service. Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message
>to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>Message-ID: <00d501bfdb1f$8d2f2710$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WW]  Family, comrades, co-workers say farewell to Key Martin
>Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 21:25:14 -0400
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>        charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the June 22, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>FAMILY, COMRADES, CO-WORKERS SAY FAREWELL TO KEY MARTIN
>
>By Deirdre Griswold
>New York
>
>With so much of the world seething under the heavy burden
>of U.S. imperialist oppression, the progressive movement
>here can ill afford the loss of even one person. And when
>that person is as tireless and revolutionary as Key Martin
>was, the loss is nearly unbearable.
>
>Martin died in March at the age of 56. In the weeks
>following, his comrades in the struggle and co-workers met
>in several cities to mourn his loss. An obituary
>summarizing his political life appeared in this newspaper
>at that time.
>
>On June 11, the organizations he had helped to build--
>Workers World Party, Peoples Video Network, and the Inter
>national Action Center--joined by Work fairness, Ha�ti
>Progr�s, the Workers Justice Committee (Detroit) and
>members of Key's family, met here at the Fashion Institute
>of Technology in an extraordinary testimonial to his life.
>
>As speaker after speaker told of his generosity, his
>militancy and his enthusiasm for the class struggle, a
>picture emerged of what a communist aims to be. Key was
>loved by his fellow workers at the Time-Life chapter of the
>Newspaper Guild. Several of them reminisced about how, as
>chapter chairperson, he had relished fighting the bosses
>and had won many benefits for the workers.
>
>Other trade unionists who had worked with Key recalled his
>militant support in both Detroit and New York for striking
>Detroit newspaper workers, who are still fighting to get
>their jobs back. One AFSCME local presented a check for
>$500 to a memorial fund to benefit the Peoples Video
>Network, which Key had founded, so that the documentary he
>had begun on the life of martyred South African Communist
>leader Chris Hani could be completed.
>
>Key Martin was a member of Workers World Party for over 35
>years, having joined its action arm, Youth Against War &
>Fascism, in the early 1960s. As each speaker added a piece
>to the mosaic of his life, it was clear that there wasn't a
>campaign or struggle carried out by the party that Key did
>not contribute to--as organizer, street tactician,
>videographer and militant. He also initiated quite a few
>projects of his own.
>
>In the last year, he had been to Seattle for the World
>Trade Organization protests, had protested police murders
>on the streets of New York in the Amadou Diallo and Patrick
>Dorismond cases, had gone to South Africa to gather
>material about Chris Hani and about the AIDS epidemic, and
>had shown innumerable kindnesses to the people around him,
>despite chronic health problems.
>
>Many speakers told of Key's devotion to his daughter,
>Tamara, who had been at his side at union negotiations and
>picket lines since the days when he carried her in a
>backpack, and of her older brother and sister, Alejandro
>and Evelyn. Poised and warm despite the emotional occasion,
>Tamara Martin spoke of her father with affection, humor and
>insight.
>
>Despite Key's many years of political activity, it seemed
>that he only grew younger as time went by. As a leading
>member of a party with a keen analysis of international
>events, he never buried himself in provincial matters but
>was well aware of the counter-revolutionary setbacks in the
>USSR and Eastern Europe. Never for a moment, however, did
>this sap his energies or his cheerful enthusiasm. His
>confidence in the victory of the worldwide working class
>over capitalist slavery grew with his own involvement in
>the struggle.
>
>Johnnie Stevens, Key's close collaborator in PVN, helped
>prepare a video on his work that was shown at the memorial.
>Those wishing to contribute to the Key Martin Memorial Fund
>can contact the Peoples Video Network at 39 West 14th St.,
>New York, NY 10011, (212) 633-6646.
>
>                         - END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service. Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message
>to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>


__________________________________

KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki - Finland
+358-40-7177941, fax +358-9-7591081
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kominf.pp.fi

___________________________________

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe/unsubscribe messages
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________


Reply via email to