(Forwarded)

  IRISH REPUBLICAN PRISONERS WELFARE  ASSOCIATION

18th August 2000

The following speech was given by Martin Galvin, Guest Speaker at a
Function in aid of the IRPWA in Belfast Tonight

"A Chairde,

"It is important to begin by commending and congratulating each of you
who have come tonight to support  Irish Republican prisoners, many of
whom are from Belfast, by giving financial help to their wives and
children.

"Many things have occurred which only 5 years ago I would have thought
impossible, incredible or inconceivable.

"High on that list would be the thought that it might be necessary in
Belfast of all places in Ireland to congratulate people for merely
supporting the families of Republican political prisoners.

"Because especially in Belfast it was always so customary, so
commonplace and so obligatory to stand behind Republican prisoners; that
rather than commending those who did what was routinely expected, you
would think in terms of what was wrong or lacking in those who would not
help the families of Republican prisoners.

"Tonight is obviously different, in large measure because the nature and
purpose of this event has been so deliberately misrepresented. I have
heard that there were calls for me to be banned by the British
government, something that was last tried by British secretary James
Prior without much success. The Irish News actually published a story
that the event was cancelled, and an editorial applauding the
cancellation. There has been an orchestrated campaign to vilify and
intimidate people. If that campaign had succeeded, if this event were
cancelled, the real victims would be the wives and children of Irish
political prisoners, and the Republican prisoners themselves, whether in
Maghaberry, England or Portlaoise. That is something which will never be
allowed to happen.

"Let me say something which the British should long ago have recognised,
that journalists should know, and that members of the wider Republican
family should have instinctively understood. Republicans will not be
broken in their support for Republican political prisoners, by anything
the British can do, by any campaign of lies and misrepresentation
orchestrated in the media, or by threats from any quarter.

"We will never stop backing the families of Republican political
prisoners, just as we will never cease in our opposition to British
rule, nor in working to build a credible Republican alternative which
will succeed in freeing all Republican political prisoners by ending
British rule.

"If anyone doubts that, let me note that just as we go forward tonight
in Belfast, there are two more such events next week in Dublin and
Dundalk.

"Well might the British and those who have joined a British Stormont
Administration worry, because the very existence of a growing number of
Republican political prisoners fighting a renewed British policy of
criminalisation belies any claim that British rule is truly changed or
is a stepping-stone or transition to anything but a re-modelled form of
British rule in which Republicans are to be, in David Trimble's terms,
'house-trained'.

"A few weeks ago, we watched the release amid celebrations of most of
the remaining political prisoners in Long Kesh. There was jubilation.

"We as Republicans welcomed their release even though we oppose the
Stormont Deal terms. There is something gratifying in seeing Republicans
- who struggled against British rule, were captured and jailed - walking
free of British prisons. It also signifies that whatever the British
have said, or say now, they will negotiate the release of prisoners now
and will ultimately be prepared to release all Irish political prisoners
as part of a
final settlement ending British rule.

"However, as I watched the coverage, I was struck with a terrible sense
of foreboding, doubt and deja-vu, and sad sense that we were seeing an
old British strategy of criminalisation being re-worked in Maghaberry.

"A quarter century ago, the British phased out internment and
Republicans celebrated. We naively hoped, and for a time believed, that
it was a move towards justice. No more internment without trial, the
British said, which was synonymous with torture, with British raids and
injustice. No more Long Kesh, only the Maze, they claimed.

"Instead the British were just dealing in a propaganda strategy. Instead
the British give us the H-Blocks and a nonsensical claim that those who
struggled against British rule before an arbitrary date of March 1,
1976, were political prisoners; but, the late Kier�n Nugent and those
who opposed British rule after that day would be mere criminals.

"Instead the British forced the blanket-protest and ultimately two
hunger strikes upon Republican political prisoners' in a failed attempt
to portray the Irish struggle against British rule as a crime.

"Republicans resisted and defeated criminalisation at great cost and
sacrifice, because the world recognised that criminals do not die such
deaths for the freedom of their countries, only patriots do.

"It should be noted that criminalisation was also defeated in England
and Portlaoise but only by hunger strike.

"Today in Maghaberry, the British are trying once again this failed
policy of criminalisation hoping that as part of the Stormont Deal, they
can succeed.

"In Maghaberry, Republican political prisoners are locked up 23 hours
per day. Republicans are deliberately divided and allocated cells
surrounded by loyalists. They have been assaulted, scalded with boiling
water, threatened, and had family members threatened during visits, all
in an attempt to break their resistance to criminalisation. Their
remission is taken in an effort to make them accept prison work. It may
be Maghaberry instead of Long Kesh, or as the British tried to re-name
it 'The Maze'. The arbitrary date is no longer March 1976, but April
1998. The same Diplock courts and judges sentence them. Criminalisation,
which has been defeated before, is being resisted now and will be
defeated again.

"However, today Sinn F�in is party to a British Stormont administration
which is seeking to criminalise Irish Republican prisoners. Sinn F�in is
a party many of whose members fought for, in some cases received or
became politically prominent around the issue of political status. How
long will Sinn F�in remain party to a British Stormont administration
which tries to criminalise Republican political prisoners? How long will
the Republican grassroots, who understand, and feel this issue so
deeply, allow them to do so?

"We want the issue of political status and segregation to be resolved
for Republican prisoners at Maghaberry, and indeed for all Republican
prisoners. We call upon the British and all parties to Stormont, to
resolve this issue, if not as a matter of Irish justice, then
pragmatically because a crisis around this issue will hold severe
political consequences for the Stormont Deal and all parties to that
deal.

"Of course Sinn F�in may dismiss these Republicans or call for them to
cease opposition to British rule. They may say the Republican political
prisoners are now 'enemies of the peace process', much like Gerry Fitt,
or former IRA member turned Stormont minister Paddy Devlin, used to
shout 'enemies of the peace'. Those words have never dissuaded
Republicans from opposing British rule and ultimately lost those who
uttered them, trust and respectability in Republican areas. We hope this
not the real transition which will be produced by the Stormont Deal."

RE-NAMED RUC

"If the issue of political status is resolved, what next? What of the
RUC? Today there is an ongoing debate over the Mandelson legislation.
The
SDLP and Sinn F�in seem in competition either in Washington or in
Westminster to get closer to Patten.

"This debate is a sham, a distraction and a diversion. Even if the
Patten report were adopted word for word, we will still see the same RUC
members who are guilty of shoot-to-kill, or collusion with loyalist
assassins, who used torture and perjury to jail Republicans, these same
RUC members will be patrolling nationalist areas. The fact that 'police'
is painted on the side of the Landrover, or they may even wear American
baseball caps, or the RUC will be re-named or re-jigged will mean little
to nationalist victims. No one in Belfast needs to be reminded of what
having the very same RUC members will mean. So long as the re-named or
re-jigged RUC is enforcing the title deed of British rule in Ireland, it
will never be acceptable to Republicans.

"How long will Sinn F�in remain party to a British Stormont
administration which unleashes a re-named or re-jigged RUC on
Republicans? How long will Republican grassroots allow them to do so?

"Will we continue to see Sinn F�in members stand in front of RUC
barracks which come under Republican attack and condemn Republicans? Are
we not entitled to conclude that this is part of the 'house-training'
David Trimble demanded?

"There are a few examples of what British rule is like and what being
party to a British administration will entail. But that is hardly
necessary to explain British rule in Belfast. The Republican political
prisoners who reject the Stormont deal want peace. They certainly want
to be with their wives and families and they believe in Ireland's
future. They do that so much so that they are prepared to sacrifice for
it.

"They of course believe in the right of the Irish people to national
freedom and sovereignty. This is not an idea that people held 80 years
ago, but goes back much further historically, as a principle that Irish
men and women have died for, and are imprisoned for as we speak, and is
an idea that will help shape Ireland's ultimate future.

"They recognise sadly that the Stormont Deal was never anything more
than a British strategy to prolong British rule by enticing former
opponents into joining a British administration with a unionist veto, on
any movement towards real justice or equality much less a united
Ireland.

"They recognise that the Stormont Deal is not the way to a united
Ireland, and have shown by their actions that they will never, never
accept British
rule in Ireland no matter who has signed on to the Stormont Deal.

"I believe that they have analysed rightly. I believe that there is
growing recognition that the Stormont Deal was never the way to a united
Ireland and the problem that Sinn F�in has is that the Republican
political analysis, which they believed in until they abandoned it, is
correct.

"British rule is irreformable. Those who join with a British
administration, whether it be the SDLP or Sinn F�in, will ultimately be
party to the sectarian system and injustices which have brought
suffering and conflict to Ireland.

"They will ultimately be driven to make a choice between coming back to
Republican principles or else staying at Stormont and losing all trust
and credibility.

"Meanwhile, growing numbers of Republicans will see that the mantel of
Irish republicanism will not wear inside a British Stormont
administration and choose to help build a credible Republican
alternative. Well might the British worry.

"Tonight I am proud to be with you and stand behind the Republican
political prisoners, whether they be in Maghaberry, Portlaoise or
England.

"We recognise why they are imprisoned. We will support them and their
families for as long as it takes. We will continue to support Republican
prisoners until the final releases of all Republican Prisoners as part
of the final end of British rule in Ireland."

Copyright � 2000 32 County Sovereignty Movement
Copyright � 2000 Ireland's OWN


--------------------------------------------------------------------<e|-

--------------------------------------------------------------------|e>-







Reply via email to