>From: "AKEL Inter Bureau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:;@tonto.eunet.fi>
>Subject: PB OF AKEL ON DEVELOPMENTS AFTER 4th ROUND PROXIMITY TALKS

>
>RESOLUTION OF THE POLITICAL BUREAU
>
>OF THE C.C. AKEL
>
>
>The Political Bureau of the Central Committee of AKEL met yesterday, September
>3rd, 2000, examined the situation around the Cyprus problem as this has been
>shaped following the completion of the forth round of proximity talks in New
>York and reached the following ascertainments:
>
>
>
>  1.. The Cyprus problem has entered its most critical stage since 1974. There
>is a deviation and backing down that has not started now, but when the known
>Group 8 statement was made and then adopted by Security Council Resolution
>1250.
>
>
>  As we have already ascertained in previous Political Bureau assessments, the
>Greek Cypriot side has been led to proximity talks that started on an
>erroneous basis in order to favour the demands raised by Mr.Denktash and
>Turkey. This erroneous basis has been proven by the UN Secretary-General's
>statement and the non-papers submitted by the UN in New York.
>
>
>
>  2.. The (Cyprus) Government bears its own responsibilities over the created
>situation. It had easily accepted the assertions given by the Americans and
>the British and had interpreted mistakenly the true meaning of the Group 8
>position and the UN Resolution 1250 that "all issues (are) on the table". What
>the foreigners mean - and they state it - by this position is that
>confederation is also on the table. The position "all issues on the table"
>constituted the beginning of the subsequent negative developments, culminating
>with the present deviation expressed by the UN Secretary-General's statement
>and De Soto's (NOTE: UN Secretary-General's Representative) thoughts.
>
>
>
>  3.. They are indeed non-papers, thoughts and not a draft solution. However,
>the substantial significance of these thoughts, which send out clear messages
>as to the content of the draft solution expected to be submitted, should not
>be underrated. If the submitted thoughts are not amended in a radical way, the
>draft solution that will be submitted at a certain stage, will not be in the
>logic of altering the Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus on the basis of a
>bi-zonal, bi-communal federation, but of creating a new state with an
>unprecedented state structure, somewhere between federation and confederation.
>Significant changes must be made also to the thoughts concerning the other
>three aspects.
>
>
>
>  4.. Following the UN Secretary-General's unacceptable opening written
>statement, the President of the Republic accepted easily the assertions, which
>were not satisfactory, both in form and in content. The replies given by the
>UNO were oral and did not respond to the posed questions, especially to the
>issue of political equality, which was the substance of the opening
>unacceptable statement. Even after the oral replies, it was repeatedly
>stressed that the opening statement is fully valid. Consequently, the
>President was wrong not to insist on the recalling of that statement.
>
>
>
>  5.. AKEL had foreseen and warned about the current developments, and had
>suggested the undertaking of initiatives to prevent or check the deviation, an
>action not taken by the Government.
>
>
>  Even at this stage, the extremely adverse situation the Cyprus problem has
>got to is reversible. Before the beginning of the new round of talks in
>Geneva, the President of the Republic must insistently ask for a new statement
>to be made by the UN Secretary-General on the basis defined by the Security
>Council Resolutions and the High-Level Agreements, and any subsequent
>proposals to be placed in that framework. Among others, De Soto's forthcoming
>visit is an appropriate occasion to put in a strong and consistent way the
>above just and logic demands. In the contrary case, there is a danger that the
>Secretary-General's opening statement would be adopted in December in the
>expected Security Council Resolution. If such a development is not averted,
>every time the President of the Republic would invoke the Resolutions, they
>will reply to us that the resolutions do not provide any framework, and that,
>therefore, the UN is not committed to support a federal solution, but any
>solution that would come out of the talks.
>
>
>
>  6.. AKEL wishes to stress again that the only appropriate way for the
>solution of the Cyprus problem is that of substantive talks. AKEL considers
>that substantive talks are such that are carried out on the basis of the UN
>resolutions and the High-Level Agreements. Denouncing the talks as a procedure
>offers no outlet, nor can talks be carried out, however, that go beyond the
>framework defined by the UN itself. Hence, substantive talks on the basis of
>the Security Council Resolutions and the High-Level Agreements should be the
>aim of our side.
>
>
>
>  7.. AKEL assures the Cypriot people, Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots,
>that it will go on struggling consistently for a solution of a bi-zonal,
>bi-communal federation through substantive inter-communal talks. Consequently,
>AKEL disagrees both with those forces that support other procedures and are
>against federation, and those in both communities who support confederation.
>AKEL supports political equality of the two communities through a federal
>state as this is defined in Reports of the UN Secretary-General and adopted by
>a number of Security Council Resolutions, and rejects the equal political
>status of the two "parties" that refers to two separate states and a
>confederal solution.
>
>
>
>  8.. AKEL greets the forces in the Turkish Cypriot community, which under
>adverse conditions support the reunification of Cyprus on the basis of a
>federation; it backs the efforts for rapprochement and sends a message of
>optimism for the success of the struggle of the Cypriot people despite the
>difficulties.
>
>
>
>
>THE POLITICAL BUREAU
>
>OF THE C.C. AKEL
>
>
>3.10.2000


_______________________________________________________

KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki - Finland
+358-40-7177941, fax +358-9-7591081
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kominf.pp.fi

_______________________________________________________

Kominform  list for general information.
Subscribe/unsubscribe  messages to

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anti-Imperialism list for anti-imperialist news.

Subscribe/unsubscribe messages:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________


Reply via email to