bit more on 'Dollarisation' and 'Euroisation'...



----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 8:51 AM
Subject: [STOPNATO.ORG.UK] BG: US and Canada as ONE!!!!


STOP NATO: �NO PASARAN! - HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK

In a message dated 23/10/00 14:28:30 Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< Subj:     san: Economic view: US, Canada as one
 Date:  23/10/00 14:28:30 Pacific Daylight Time
 From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Fitzpatrick)
 Sender:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] (san)

 hi,

 this ran today on the front page of the boston globe.

 in solidarity,
 bill.
 ----------------------------------------

 Economic view: US, Canada as one

  By Colin Nickerson, Globe Staff, 10/23/2000

       ONTREAL - The US-Canada border, with its inspection posts and
 legions
 of customs and immigration police enforcing a profusion of rules and
 restrictions,
 runs 3,987 miles from the Atlantic to the Pacific, a scratch across the
 heart of the richest
 two-nation trading relationship the world has ever known.

  Goods and services - everything from jet engines to fish sticks,
 computer
 chips to hydroelectricity - pour across this line at an almost
 unimaginable rate of more than $45 million an hour, $1.1 billion a day,
 $434 billion a year. The province of Ontario alone exports more to the
 United States than does Japan.

  The torrent of trade has become so prodigious that many analysts are
 convinced it will soon wipe away the border itself. Notions once
 dismissed as the paranoid fantasies of Canadian ultranationalists - an
 end to border controls, the US dollar as common currency, the
 undercutting of Canada's tax codes and cherished social policies to
 align with those of the superpower next door -
  are now bandied about as the way of the future in corporate strategy
 sessions and policy thinkfests.

  The subject of full economic union is still taboo in Ottawa and
 Washington
 but is moving toward mainstream thought in Toronto, New York, Montreal,
 Boston, and other centers where business
  takes precedence over politics. And in the US-Canada relationship, the
 business view nearly always triumphs.

  Here is Brian Mulroney, Canada's former prime minister and today a
 powerful
 corporate mover and shaker whose words reflect boardroom thinking on
 both sides:

  ''I certainly support getting rid of all this stuff at the border,
 which
 inhibit progress and inhibit the free movement of goods, services, and
 people,'' he told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation the other day.

  Recent years have seen such a profound blending of the two economies
 that
 many US-Canada watchers are convinced that formal divides between the
 two countries will vanish within a decade
  or two, the border becoming just a mark on the map - with not so much
 as a
 speed bump to stand sentinel at what once seemed the front line of
 nationhood.

  ''We seem headed toward economic integration,'' said Louis Balthazar, a

 senior Canadian political scientist teaching as a Fulbright scholar at
 Bridgewater State College. ''I would bet on at least the formation of a
 customs union ... in which Canada surrenders part of its sovereignty.''

  Most Americans would barely notice such a momentous change, but
 Canadians
 are only too keenly aware that their prosperous but culturally
 vulnerable country is fast
 becoming just the northern branch of America Inc.

  ''The Americanization of our economy has entered a disturbing new
 reality,'' wrote Canadian historian Peter C. Newman in a recent article
 for Maclean's magazine. ''[Canada is] well on the way
  to becoming an economic colony of the Americans ... self-governing, but

 indentured to the Yankee dollar.''

  Now that the Cold War is over and the old ''special relationship''
 between
 Washington and Ottawa starts to fade, with Canada coolly viewed by US
 policy makers as just another foreign country, there is increasingly
 serious talk of formal economic integration, along lines similar to the
 European Union.

  The countries would keep separate flags and political systems, but the
 physical barriers would be reduced to highway signs announcing a switch
 of jurisdiction, like the ones demarcating Vermont and Massachusetts.

  And for all the talk of a ''new partnership,'' no one doubts that
 Washington, not Ottawa, would call the important shots in such a union.

  French Quebecers, the nation's most boisterously pro-American
 population,
 support open borders and, more radically, adoption of the US dollar.
 ''The border has become just a bother,'' said Louise
  Beaudoin, Quebec's minister for international relations.

  ''Our trade with New England is up 100 percent in 10 years, while trade

 with Ontario is up only 12 percent,'' she said. ''We need to be thinking
 north-south, not east-west along the old lines. ...
  People and goods should be moving just as freely between Montreal and
 Boston as between Montreal and Toronto.''

  But the concept is potential political dynamite in both countries.

  Canadians, far more sensitive to the issue, fear that erasing the
 border
 will obliterate their national identity, making the country little more
 than an oversized ''51st state'' with perhaps a few traditions -
  Parliament, the Mounties, the Maple Leaf symbol - to distinguish it
 from
 the behemoth below.

  The fear among Americans, raised mainly by conservatives seeking a
 clampdown, is that throwing open the border will make the United States
 more vulnerable to terrorists and illegal immigrants.

  But the beating of drums for economic merger - by corporate honchos,
 think
 tank researchers, trade consultants, and ''working groups'' at
 international conferences - is building quietly, some think inexorably.

  Proponents are using exactly the sort of stealth strategy that spawned
 the
 1989 US-Canada Free Trade Agreement and, five years later, the North
 American Free Trade Agreement - both decried at first as outlandish,
 politically impossible concepts.

  Typical was last year's report by the C.D. Howe Institute, a Toronto
 think
 tank that tends to reflect the views of Canada's financial leaders,
 urging that Canada adopt a ''common currency'' with the
  United States - read, the American greenback. There was an explosion of

 outrage, and Canadian politicians predictably huffed that Canada will
 never surrender the
 ''loonie,'' as the Canadian dollar is called after the loon on the
 one-dollar coin.

  But the proposal is now ''out there,'' and draws scant notice when the
 pros
 and cons are hoisted by economists or businessfolk.

  ''It's policy making by trial balloon,'' said Maude Barlow, chairwoman
 of
 the Council of Canadians, a nationalist group opposed to greater
 integration.

  ''The corporations and the think tanks and the so-called `working
 groups'
 float these notions to see how much we scream in horror,'' she said.
 ''After a while, the screaming fades. And the trial balloons become
 official policy.''

  Indeed, growing numbers of Canadian firms, including Nortel Networks -
 the
 Ontario-based flagship of the country's high-tech industry - already
 keep their books in
 US dollars. Economic integration seems to be the marching order for the
 Western world.
 Across the Atlantic, 15 western European democracies have coalesced into
 economic union, effectively erasing national borders across much of the
 continent. South American countries are clamoring for similar
 partnerships.

  For English Canadians, absorption by the United States is the oldest
 nightmare. Many are descendants of loyalists who fled north after the
 American Revolution.

  ''Eliminating the border entails more than just an unimpeded flow of
 goods,'' said James Laxer, political scientist at Ontario's York
 University. ''Would Canada, with its tradition of strict gun control,
 end up importing the Second Amendment?''

  Canadian politicians are especially reluctant to address the issue as
 national elections draw near. Prime Minister Jean Chretien swears Canada
 will never abandon border controls or join a customs
  union with the United States. Of course, for much of his political
 career,
 he swore to oppose free trade with the United States - but his first act
 upon gaining the top office was signing the NAFTA accord.

  South of the border, Canadian officials pipe a different tune. The
 country's most influential diplomat, Raymond Chretien - nephew of the
 prime minister and ambassador to the United States until his transfer to
 Paris last month - has spoken urgently of the need to bring the
 US-Canada economies
  into perfect harmony.

  A new study by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a think
 tank
 in Washington, flatly  predicts Canada will be swept into the US
 economic embrace.

  There are 30 million Canadians, 270 million US citizens. The imbalance
 is
 old, but never before, surveys suggest, have Canadians felt so
 overwhelmed by their neighbor. One recent broad-based poll found that 32
 percent of Canadians flatly predict their nation will be swallowed by
 the United States within 25 years.

  ''Canadians have deeply ambiguous feelings toward the border,'' said
 political scientist Balthazar. ''It's the fount of prosperity, but also
 the source of great national anxiety.

  ''Canadians know in their hearts that Americans will always be
 Americans,
 the envy of the world,'' he said. ''But who will Canadians be?''

  This story ran on page A01 of the Boston Globe on 10/23/2000.


  >>




______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Taking Care of Business is always a snap when you shop with the
world's largest seller of office products.  From pencils to PDAs,
Office Depot has what you're looking for, plus FREE delivery on all
orders over $50.  Click here to start saving:


http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/Office_Depot

Reply via email to