>From: Jessica Sundin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>    Colombia Action Network http://www.freespeech.org/actioncolombia
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Hello friends & a special welcome to new list members!
>
>It's just a couple weeks until over ten thousand people converge on the
>School of Americas at Fort Benning, Georgia. The Colombia Action Network
>will be there, with our fancy new t-shirts for sale, a newspaper all
>about Colombia, cool stickers & a spirited contingent. PLEASE join us!
>At the end of the day on Saturday, November 18th, at a hotel near the
>School, the CAN will host a meeting of all activists interested in
>Colombia solidarity organizing. We'll be sending out details soon, so
>get your carpool, van reservation or bus ticket together now. See you
>there!
>
>1. Latest Battleground in Latin Drug War: Brazilian Amazon
>2. Colombia Holds Elections, For the Most Part Peaceably
>3. U.S. troops to El Salvador
>4. ACTION ALERT! New Jersey protest on 11/4
>5. Minnesota on 11/4: The War on Drugs: A War on Colombia's Women and
>Families
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>October 30, 2000, New York Times
>
>Latest Battleground in Latin Drug War: Brazilian Amazon
>By LARRY ROHTER
>
>TABATINGA, Brazil ? Until recently, this town on the corner of the
>frontiers of Brazil, Peru and Colombia was one of the most sleepy,
>remote and overlooked parts of the Amazon. But that was before the
>fighting upriver by army troops, guerrillas and paramilitary forces on
>Colombia's side of the 1,021-mile border started to intensify.
>
>Suddenly, the Brazilian government is stepping up river patrols and air
>surveillance and destroying clandestine airstrips, driven by a concern
>that the $1.3 billion the United States has promised Colombia to bolster
>its army may further fuel the long war against drug traffickers and
>their guerrilla allies and send it spilling into Brazil.
>
>"We know that once the gringos have strengthened the army's hand there,
>we may get whacked too," said Mauro Sposito, head of the new Brazilian
>force here. "So this operation was undertaken as a preventive measure,
>in anticipation of whatever problems may come our way."
>
>Although a modest effort, the new Brazilian campaign is only the most
>visible sign that a full-scale militarization of the Amazon and beyond
>is underway as Colombia's war threatens to draw in its neighbors. From
>Panama to Bolivia, governments and armies are girding for the worst by
>strengthening their defense forces in every way they can.
>
>The operation, involving 180 police officers, 18 patrol boats, 2
>airplanes and a helicopter, is part of Brazil's expanding attempt to
>steel itself against the spillover effects already being felt in the
>region. Refugees fleeing the violence in Colombia have been crossing
>borders, and guerrilla forces who work in symbiosis with drug
>traffickers are increasingly coming to see neighboring countries as safe
>bases and supply areas.
>
>The larger fear is that the problems will only deepen with the
>American-financed program to aid Colombia's army, a force with a
>lackluster record on human rights and in the battlefield.
>
>Peru and Venezuela have stepped up troop deployments along their borders
>with Colombia. And Ecuador, by far the weakest country in the area, has
>said it will seek an aid package of its own from Washington. But it is
>Brazil that has sovereignty over the largest and most vulnerable piece
>of the world's biggest jungle, and it is Brazil that is now engaged in
>the most ambitious, extensive and costly effort to occupy and defend its
>sparsely populated frontiers.
>
>For Latin America's largest country that focus marks a historic shift in
>priorities. Throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, Brazil was focused
>on its southern border with Argentina, where the biggest concentrations
>of troops and military equipment have always been deployed, and largely
>neglected its northern borders.
>
>The key to the beefed-up Brazilian effort in the Amazon, which accounts
>for 60 percent of the country's territory, is a $1.4 billion radar
>project called the Amazon Vigilance System, known as Sivam, from its
>acronym in Portuguese.
>
>The American-financed system, which consists of 19 fixed and 6 mobile
>radar posts, was begun in 1997 to monitor deforestation, fires and
>illegal mining. But it has taken on great military significance with the
>deteriorating situation in Colombia, and is now considered a vital tool
>by both Brazilian and American officials to track the movements of
>guerrilla and drug operations, which often use small private aircraft.
>
>"We have all of Brazilian airspace controlled, except for the Amazon,"
>Gen. Alberto Cardoso, the government's national security minister,
>explained in an interview in Bras�lia early this month. "Now, the Sivam
>project is going to fill that void and permit us to defend our
>territory." In mid-October, Brazil offered to share data gathered from
>Sivam with neighbors and the United States. "With Sivam and our own
>electronic intelligence gathering capacity, I expect to see us working
>together and sharing information in an unprecedented fashion so that we
>can each benefit from what we know and need to know about drug
>trafficking activity," the American Ambassador to Brazil, Anthony S.
>Harrington, said in a recent interview.
>
>In 1998, the Brazilian Congress approved legislation that would allow
>the Air Force to shoot down any aircraft that enters Brazilian airspace
>illegally. Peru and Colombia have similar laws, but "ours is broader,"
>General Cardoso said, and "has to be regulated by a decree that is still
>being discussed, due to the sensitivity of the problem," before it can
>be put into effect.
>
>As part of its effort to control the sky over the often impenetrable
>jungle, the Brazilian government has also announced that it intends to
>spend about $3.5 billion during the next eight years to buy new
>supersonic fighter planes and transport planes. It will also refurbish
>100 combat jets.
>
>The buildup is intended to remedy a vulnerability that Brazil was
>reminded of last year, when a plane on its way from neighboring Suriname
>made an emergency landing in the eastern Amazon state of Par�. An
>inspection revealed a cargo of arms, which Brazilian law enforcement
>officials say were apparently destined for guerrillas in Colombia in
>exchange for cocaine that would be shipped to Europe.
>
>This kind of network of arms for drug transfers is so vast, organized
>and entrenched that the strongman who has dominated Suriname for nearly
>20 years, Desi Bouterse, is facing drug trafficking charges in the
>Netherlands, Suriname's former colonial power.
>
>In addition, the Brazilian press, citing police sources, has accused the
>Surinamese Embassy of involvement in the arms shipment, but the
>Surinamese ambassador refused to testify in a recent congressional
>investigation into drug trafficking, citing his diplomatic status.
>
>More recently, in July, two small planes from Suriname were detected in
>Brazilian airspace and managed to land at a clandestine airstrip in
>Vaup�s, Colombia, where they unloaded what officials suspect was a cargo
>of arms for the guerrillas before Colombian troops could locate the
>planes and blow them up.
>
>Faced with the sweeping scale of the terrain and the problem, Brazilian
>officials are well aware that an effort as modest as theirs cannot
>eliminate such traffic. "Our border with Colombia is more than 1,000
>miles long, so extensive and with an area of jungle so inhospitable that
>even if we multiplied by 10 or 15 the forces deployed there, we would
>still be short of people," General Cardoso said.
>
>The Brazilian Army has 22,000 troops permanently stationed in the
>Amazon, about 10 percent of its total strength. But the government
>officially maintains that, in Mr. Sposito's words, "the guerrillas do
>not exist in Brazil, only narcotraffickers," and has made it clear that
>it intends to keep its forces as far removed as possible from the combat
>in Colombia.
>
>"Brazil is not willing to send units of the army or the police to fight
>alongside their Colombian counterparts, whether against the guerrillas
>or narcotics traffickers," Minister of Foreign Affairs Luiz Felipe
>Lampreia said in a recent interview in Bras�lia. Any additional dispatch
>of troops that may occur, he added, will be intended exclusively "to
>strengthen our military presence on the border in order to defend and
>safeguard our frontier."
>
>But Brazil is already peripherally involved in the Colombian conflict.
>Late in 1998, Colombia's main left- wing guerrilla group, the
>Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, attacked and briefly
>held Mit�, a provincial capital in Colombia just across the border,
>forcing Colombian troops to withdraw to Iauaret�, a base in Brazilian
>territory.
>
>A Colombian official said recently that Colombian forces were able to
>retake Mit� by counterattacking partly from Brazil. But when General
>Cardoso was asked about the incident, he disagreed, saying that "there
>were many wounded, who for purely humanitarian reasons were treated in
>our hospital" and that after an exchange of diplomatic notes Brazil
>obtained "a Colombian commitment that such a thing would not happen
>again."
>
>The main concern of both governments is a remote and sparsely populated
>region, known as the Dog's Head, where neither government has much of a
>presence, spawning fears that guerrilla groups or drug traffickers may
>be tempted to fill the vacuum.
>
>FARC leaders say they are not active in Brazil and do not plan to be.
>"Our struggle is in Colombia," so "Brazil can rest assured that there
>will be no incursions," Ra�l Reyes, a rebel spokesman, said in August.
>But Colombian and American officials say the rebels take that position
>only because Brazil is more useful to them at the moment as a rear
>supply base. As Brazilian officials acknowledge, rebels regularly cross
>the border to buy food and medicine at accessible border settlements
>where they do not fear capture.
>
>"There is no way to block supplies legally acquired in our country and
>then transported to Colombian territory," General Cardoso said. "The
>people doing the buying don't say they are guerrillas, so how are you
>going to prohibit a shopowner from selling his products to them?"
>
>Brazil is also growing in importance as a source of the precursor
>chemicals used to manufacture cocaine. Manaus, nearly 1,000 miles
>downriver from here, is an important industrial center, and Colombian
>units that have raided cocaine laboratories say they often find labels
>in Portuguese indicating that the chemicals came from Brazil.
>
>"We've had candid discussions about this, and Brazil is aware of the
>problem and focused on doing something about it, but they have a huge
>territory to cover," Mr. Harrington said. "You can't station men all
>over the Amazon and watch for cement bags coming through," he added, so
>Brazil plans to "examine and identify the companies that are involved in
>this business."
>
>Pressures on Brazil to assume a higher profile in the Amazon will, of
>course, likely require more money and a larger commitment of security
>forces. But in contrast to a decade ago, when resentment of 21 years of
>military dictatorship still lingered, it is clear that popular support
>for such a buildup is now a certainty.
>
>"If there is one positive aspect to the emergence of these problems with
>Plan Colombia, it is that all of society has now awakened to the
>necessity of the defense of the Amazon," General Cardoso said.
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>NEW YORK TIMES, Monday, 30 October 2000
>
>Colombia Holds Elections, For the Most Part Peaceably
>By Juan Forero
>
>BOGOTA -- Colombians voted under heavy military security today in
>municipal and provincial elections that were seen as a test of the
>government's ability to carry out a crucial democratic exercise in a
>country racked by conflict.
>
>There was isolated violence. In the coca-growing province of Putumayo,
>the scene of weeks of recent fighting between leftist rebels and
>paramilitary groups, voting was sparse, apparently because of rebel
>roadblocks. Hundreds of miles north in Antioquia, government soldiers
>clashed with fighters from the country's largest rebel group, the
>Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, disrupting voting in two towns.
>
>In the town of Leiva in the southern province of Narino, rebels blocked
>people from voting for provincial offices. And in the demilitarized zone
>in the province of Caqueta, which the government ceded to the
>Revolutionary Armed Forces in the hope of furthering peace talks, voting
>in five municipalities took place for the first time under formal rebel
>control.
>
>The government declared the election a success, though, with the
>relatively peaceful voting in much of the country characterized as a
>repudiation of violence. Although the official turnout was not available
>this evening, authorities said they expected to find that up to 50
>percent of the 23 million eligible voters had cast ballots, a typical
>showing here.
>
>Colombians voted for governors, mayors, provincial delegates and town
>councilors in all 1,093 municipalities, with 145,000 candidates all
>told. "The attitude of the citizens was exemplary," said Ivan Duque, the
>country's elections commissioner.
>
>The elections came at an important juncture for Colombia. The country is
>trying to project an image of stability as it embarks on a $7.5 billion
>program to cut coca production and curtail rebel influence, a plan that
>is heavily financed by the United States and international lending
>institutions.
>
>After voting in the capital's central plaza, President Andres Pastrana
>declared the vote "an important message for the peace process."
>
>"It says to the insurgency that Colombians want to strengthen our
>electoral process, that we want to strengthen our democracy," he said.
>
>More than 50,000 police officers and 100,000 soldiers protected polling
>places and roadways in more troubled regions. Fifty international
>observers were also on hand.
>
>"I was worried, as usual, because subversive groups always carry out
>threats during elections," said one voter in Bogota, Luis Fernando
>Vanegas, 60. "But the government has the armed forces taking control and
>making sure there's public order."
>
>The weeks leading up to the election, however, were chaotic. Rebels
>carried out stinging attacks against the military and the police. Eight
>congressmen and local politicians were kidnapped in recent days, most by
>paramilitary gunmen. The country has also watched in horror as three
>people taken captive earlier this year in a mass kidnapping by the
>National Liberation Army, Colombia's second-largest rebel group, died in
>captivity. Today, the rebels announced they would release 21 other
>captives on Monday.
>
>The government had guaranteed that this year's elections would not be a
>repeat of the last nationwide elections, in 1997, when the largest rebel
>group vowed to sabotage elections and then carried out a campaign of
>intimidation and violence.
>
>In recent months, instead of wrecking the elections, the group embarked
>on a shadowy strategy to influence them by giving tacit approval to some
>municipal candidates while opposing others. Dozens of candidates dropped
>out. In addition, 36 candidates were slain, 6 by the Revolutionary Armed
>Forces and two other rebel movements, 10 by paramilitary gunmen and 20
>by unknown groups, said Maj. Gen. Tobias Duran, chief of operations for
>the national police.
>
>"The truth is that the candidates, some of them, have said they've been
>pressured," General Duran said. "And in some situations involving
>mayors, the armed groups want part of the budget for what they call aid
>for their revolutionary movement."
>
>Still, throughout Colombia, millions of people voted without incident.
>In Bogota, streets were closed to traffic as families made a festive day
>of the elections. Children scooted along on bicycles or in-line skates
>as street vendors hawked sodas and barbecued chicken and corn.
>
>"This is a day of fun," said Ernesto Zapata, 21, after casting his
>ballot. "Everyone is having a good day. Everyone is out in the street."
>
>Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>National Catholic Reporter, October 13, 2000
>
>U.S. troops to El Salvador
>By GARY MacEOIN
>
>U.S. armed forces, withdrawn from El Salvador under the 1992 Peace
>Accords, are active again in that country unders a  controversial
>agreement that opponents say violates the peace  accord.
>
>The new arrangement derives from an agreement between the Salvadoran and
>U.S. governments. Signed last March with  information provided to
>neither the National Assembly nor the press,  according to Salvadoran
>news reports, it is intended to beef up  anti-drug activities in the
>region.
>
>The troops will use Comalapa, El Salvador's principal airport 45
>kilometers from San Salvador, as a "forward operating location,"
>according to news reports in El Salvador. Comalapa is the same  airport
>from which Maryknoll Srs. Ita Ford and Maura Clark,  Ursuline Sr.
>Dorothy Kazel and lay missioner Jean Donovan were  kidnapped 29 years
>ago, to be subsequently raped and killed.
>
>Forward operating locations are a key element in the restructuring of
>the U.S. military presence in Latin America after the 1997
>Torrijos-Carter treaty ended U.S. control of the Panama Canal and
>forced the closure of the U.S. Southern Command in Panama,  according to
>experts familiar with military operations in the region.
>
>The main U.S. Southern Command bases are now in Florida and Puerto Rico,
>with forward operating locations in Aruba and Cura�ao  off Venezuela in
>the Netherlands Antilles, and at the Manta air base  in Ecuador. These
>locations are all controlled by the air force.  Comalapa, however, is
>under the Navy, and will be available for  land, sea and air operations.
>
>--Drugs provide rationale
>The smoldering embers of the recent civil war flared in July when the
>agreement was submitted to the Salvadoran National Assembly  for
>approval, according to reports in San Salvador's El Diario de  Hoy.
>ARENA, the party of the oligarchy that owes its survival in  that war to
>massive U.S. economic and military support, has fewer  seats than the
>FMLN, the former guerrillas (29 and 31 in a House of  84). ARENA
>governs, however, with the backing of three minor  parties.
>
>FMLN leader Jorge Schafik Handal denounced the agreement as a violation
>both of the Constitution and of the Peace Accords in an El  Diario
>story. He insisted that this is a treaty requiring approval by a
>three-fourths assembly vote. When the government passed it by a  simple
>majority, the FMLN initiated a challenge in the Supreme  Court.
>
>Although the court has not yet ruled, the United States is  implementing


_______________________________________________________

KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki - Finland
+358-40-7177941, fax +358-9-7591081
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kominf.pp.fi

_______________________________________________________

Kominform  list for general information.
Subscribe/unsubscribe  messages to

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anti-Imperialism list for anti-imperialist news.

Subscribe/unsubscribe messages:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________


Reply via email to