>and cell phones.
>
>In about a week, the Israeli forces had defaced or blocked
>20 pro-Palestinian Web sites, according to a report on
>ZDNet, a Web-based computer-industry publication. In the
>following two weeks, supporters of the Palestinians had
>brought down about 30 pro-Israeli sites. This includes a
>widely publicized take over of the American Israeli Public
>Affairs Committee site, which was replaced with Web pages
>denouncing the massacre of Palestinians.
>
>The cyber war was started by Israeli forces, as was
>acknowledged by iDefense Intelligence Services, a Fairfax,
>Va.-based company. An Oct. 31 iDefense report says that pro-
>Palestinian actions on the Web are "seen as defensive
>actions in response to offensive actions by pro-Israeli
>attackers. This has significantly increased the talent pool
>on the pro-Palestinian side."
>
>In fact, the pro-Palestinian counter-offensive has been very
>effective. The pro-Palestinian effort is now in Phase Three,
>reports the Lebanese Daily Star. Phase Three aims to shut
>down Israeli Internet service providers. A Phase Four has
>also been announced. If the Israeli attacks on pro-
>Palestinian Web sites continue, Israeli e-commerce sites
>will be the next targets.
>
>- END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Message-ID: <00c201c04e9b$f3335960$0a00a8c0@linux>
>From: "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WW]  Stop U.S.-Israeli terrorism
>Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 19:35:26 -0500
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>        charset="Windows-1252"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the Nov. 16, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>
>BUFFALO, N.Y.: 'STOP U.S.-ISRAELI TERRORISM'
>
>The progressive community in Buffalo, N.Y., came out to
>support the Palestinian uprising on Oct. 16 and Oct. 20.
>Anti-war and anti-imperialist forces stood in
>solidarity with members of the local Arab community for two
>spirited, militant protests condemning Israel and the United
>States for their ongoing terrorism
>against the Palestinian people.
>
>Chants and signs proclaimed "Long live Palestine," along
>with other messages of
>support for the just cause of the Palestinian people. One
>banner highlighted the U.S. role in the attacks with the
>words "No U.S. war in the Middle East."
>
>Arab youths led militant chants of "No justice, no peace!"
>and "Stop U.S.-Israeli
>terrorism!"
>
>Several high school students joined in one of the protests
>on their way home
>from school. Passers-by in cars and on foot raised their
>fists and honked their horns
>in support. The Oct. 16 protest received major coverage from
>the local big-business media.
>
>-- Barb Neth
>
>- END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Message-ID: <00ca01c04e9c$08379920$0a00a8c0@linux>
>From: "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WW]  Is Colombia another Vietnam?
>Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 19:36:02 -0500
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>        charset="Windows-1252"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the Nov. 16, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>MEETING ASKS: IS COLOMBIA ANOTHER VIETNAM?
>
>By Jack A. Smith
>Highland, N.Y.
>
>Is the U.S. government about to create "another Vietnam" in
>Colombia, the Latin American country of 40 million
>inhabitants where a people's war has been raging for
>decades?
>
>This was the topic addressed at the Nov. 6 Caribbean and
>Latin America Support Committee public meeting in Highland,
>N.Y., by Workers World journalist, CUNY professor, and
>International Action Center activist Andy McInerney. His
>answer, in essence: it certainly seems headed in that
>direction, despite disclaimers from Washington.
>
>"In 1960, there were less than 1,000 U.S. military
>'advisers' in Vietnam," he began, noting that the multi-
>millions Washington was spending to support the corrupt
>South Vietnamese government at the time was small change
>compared to the multi-billions budgeted in later years. And
>of course, the Pentagon was saying that the "advisers" were
>to be kept out of combat. Within five years the U.S. was
>sinking into the quagmire of a widespread protracted war.
>
>"The U.S. people didn't know anything about Vietnam in 1960,
>even though there were warning signs," McInerney added.
>"These same warning signs are showing up once again 40 years
>later in Colombia.
>
>"U.S. military aid skyrocketed to $90 million in 1998. A
>year later it increased to $300 million. This year Congress
>approved $1.3 billion. Colombia is now the Pentagon's third
>largest recipient of free military aid."
>
>The 200 U.S. military "advisers" in counter-insurgency war
>already sent to Colombia will be bolstered by 200-300 more,
>according to the latest Clinton administration plans. The
>latest allocation will include sending 60 combat helicopters
>to Colombia.
>
>"Washington claims that all of this is part of a war on
>drugs," McInerney scoffed. "This is just a sham--a cover for
>a counter-insurgency war, as in Vietnam."
>
>'A SERIOUS CONTEST FOR STATE POWER'
>
>McInerney explained that the U.S. is getting deeply involved
>now in the decades-long guerrilla struggle waged by the
>Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia-People's Army (FARC-
>EP) and the smaller National Liberation Army (ELN) because
>"the success of the people's struggle has reached the point
>where there is a serious contest for state power."
>
>The territory of Colombia is larger than the combined area
>of France, Britain, the Netherlands and Belgium--and the
>rebel forces occupy almost half of it. As in Vietnam, if the
>U.S. "loses" Colombia it fears a domino effect might result
>in "losing" other countries it presently dominates in Latin
>America.
>
>To this end, Washington and the Colombian government of
>President Andres Pastrana have recently cooked up a major,
>$7.5 billion counter-insurgency scheme called "Plan
>Colombia." Its purpose is the eventual defeat of the
>guerrilla forces--although the plan is supposedly aimed at
>Colombia's export of drugs.
>
>Speaking of the drug war, McInerney noted that the U.S. is
>the largest importer of drugs in the world and that "if
>Washington really wanted to end the drug problem, it would
>take these billions and invest it at home in drug
>rehabilitation programs, in job training and job creation,
>and in vast improvements in educational services. Investing
>this money in the brutal Colombian army to fight the FARC
>and ELN won't have any impact on U.S. dependence on
>Colombian drugs."
>
>COLOMBIAN ARMY, DEATH SQUADS WORK TOGETHER
>
>McInerney characterized as propaganda the notion that there
>is a "three-sided war going on in Colombia" composed of (1)
>the government and its armed forces, (2) the right-wing
>paramilitary armies and (3) the revolutionary forces. He
>said the paramilitaries--which he termed "death squads"
>responsible for the bulk of killings in Colombia--work in
>collaboration with the armed forces, often doing their dirty
>work.
>
>There are only two sides in the conflict, McInerney said,
>"the government, which is backed by the wealthy ruling class
>and the death squads, and the people's forces" composed of
>military and civilian components struggling to create a
>socialist Colombia free from control by the oligarchy, the
>drug lords, the military elite, global corporations and
>imperialism.
>
>The speaker also disputed the "blame-both-sides" argument
>that the struggle is being waged between the government and
>the rebel forces with the masses of people squeezed between
>them.
>
>"Colombia is a nation of heroes, not of innocent people
>caught in the middle," he said, noting the activism of the
>country's strong labor movement and other insurgent forces
>fighting against International Monetary Fund demands for
>belt-tightening by the poor and privatization of national
>resources.
>
>APPEAL TO ANTI-WAR ACTIVISTS
>
>McInerney ended his talk with an appeal to progressive
>forces in the United States "to become active in the
>struggle against expanding U.S. intervention in Colombia."
>He urged anti-war forces participating in the demonstration
>against the School of the Americas in Ft. Benning, Ga.,
>later in November to raise the question of Colombia "because
>it's probably had more officers trained at the SOA than any
>other Latin American country."
>
>He also noted that the International Action Center has just
>formed a U.S. Out of Colombia Committee that planned to
>organize a nationwide movement to oppose U. S. intervention
>plans.
>
>One of the committee's first activities will be a public
>meeting in New York City on Dec. 12 to oppose U.S.
>intervention in Colombia. Former U.S. Attorney General
>Ramsey Clark will be a featured speaker. The meeting will
>take place at 6:30 p.m. at the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
>Labor Center at 330 West 43rd St. in Manhattan. For
>information call the International Action Center at (212)
>633-6646 or the Mid-Hudson National People's Campaign/IAC at
>(845) 255-5779.
>
>- END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>
>
>Message-ID: <00d201c04e9c$1b02b1c0$0a00a8c0@linux>
>From: "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WW]  Sierra Leone: U.S., Britain step up intervention
>Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 19:36:33 -0500
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>        charset="Windows-1252"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the Nov. 16, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>SIERRA LEONE: U.S., BRITAIN STEP UP INTERVENTION
>
>By G. Dunkel
>
>Cloaked in honeyed words and hiding behind the veil of
>United Nations legitimacy, Great Britain is intensifying its
>military intervention in Sierra Leone. A civil war has been
>raging in this former British colony in West Africa for the
>past eight years.
>
>Sierra Leone, which was colonized by Britain in 1793, is one
>of the world's major diamond producers.
>
>At the same time, the Pentagon is sending 250 specialists in
>weapons and communications to Nigeria to train its soldiers
>for service in Sierra Leone and Liberia, another West
>African country immersed in civil war. The U.S. will also
>provide military supplies to the troops it is training.
>
>Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon told the British Parliament on
>Oct. 30 that a Royal Navy Amphibious Ready Group, including
>the helicopter carrier HMS Ocean and landing ships, would be
>deployed offshore Sierra Leone during November with about
>700 soldiers.
>
>Earlier he had announced that a few hundred more military
>"teachers" would be introduced into Sierra Leone. Their
>"schools" would include the headquarters of the Sierra Leone
>army.
>
>Prime Minister Tony Blair is in command of another 5,000
>British soldiers now being organized into a Rapid Deployment
>Force to intervene in Sierra Leone, if need be.
>
>UN TROOPS FIRE ON CROWD
>
>Over 12,000 UN soldiers are presently stationed in Sierra
>Leone as "peacekeepers." Some detachments of this UN force,
>known as Unamasil, have taken an active part in the civil
>war on the government's side. The latest reported example
>was on Nov. 5 when UN troops, backing up the local police,
>fired on a crowd protesting a nightly curfew in Freetown,
>the capital.
>
>Last spring 500 UN troops were captured by the Revolutionary
>United Front, the rebel force. London sent 1,000 marine
>commandos to Sierra Leone in May to try and free them.
>Fearing its troops could be trapped, Britain withdrew them
>in June.
>
>Now, four months later, after the Indian commander of the UN
>force resigned, Britain has announced that one of its
>brigadier generals will be chief of staff to the new UN
>commander, three-star Kenyan General Daniel Ishmael Opande.
>
>The Independent of London reported Nov. 2 that unnamed
>military analysts feel that these moves--entering the UN
>command structure, preparing a rapid deployment force,
>sending advisors to Nigeria and paying for its forces--
>signal a recognition by Britain and the U.S. that the Sierra
>Leone conflict threatens to spread throughout West Africa.
>
>After centuries of the slave trade, after generations of
>colonial rule, and now after the International Monetary
>Fund's "structural adjustment programs" have squeezed out
>whatever wealth remained in the hands of independent
>governments, conditions in West Africa have become so
>desperate that movements of the people for revolutionary
>change are inevitable.
>
>The U.S. and Britain, as well as France, are determined to
>retain and expand their neocolonial dominion throughout the
>area. The violence that results must be laid directly on the
>doorstep of the imperialist powers.
>
>- END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>
>


_______________________________________________________

KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki - Finland
+358-40-7177941, fax +358-9-7591081
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kominf.pp.fi

_______________________________________________________

Kominform  list for general information.
Subscribe/unsubscribe  messages to

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anti-Imperialism list for anti-imperialist news.

Subscribe/unsubscribe messages:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________


Reply via email to