>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>
>Degraded policy
>Children suffering, filthy water, burning villages:
>these are our sanctions against Iraq
>
>Special report: Iraq
>
>Jeremy Hardy
>Saturday November 18, 2000
>The Guardian
>
>Monday sees the launch of a national petition against
>sanctions in Iraq. It will probably pass unnoticed.
>Sanctions aside, Britain and America bomb Iraq
>whenever they feel like it, and with no news coverage
>at all. Presumably, the purpose of the bombing and
>sanctions is to degrade something. The something is
>ourselves.
>
>I'm sure those who are reinventing world politics in
>the light of a new-found enthusiasm for western
>military intervention, are convinced that Saddam
>Hussein is about to fall at any moment. If he does at
>least Iraq will be newsworthy. Saddam is getting more
>press these days anyway because he's sitting on a lot
>of oil. So are we, if only we had the wit to
>renationalise it, but since we gave it all away, we
>rely on oil companies to make nice with dictators and
>help them to crush internal opposition so that we can
>keep our hauliers trucking. The oil-for-food programme
>is one way in which the west has sought to keep the
>oil coming.
>
>In fact, the amount of oil which Iraq is allowed to
>export was set higher than its much degraded industry
>was able to produce. Even then the programme is not as
>generous as it sounds, because the oil money is held
>in a UN-managed account with 30% coming off the top in
>reparations and imports subject to approval by the
>Security Council. Equipment vital to Iraq's
>electricity and water supplies are held up. As a
>result water is frequently contaminated (there's a
>biological weapon for you) and the national grid could
>completely pack up at any moment.
>
>The British government line is that medical shortages
>are the result of stockpiling. Former UN humanitarian
>co-ordinators, Denis Halliday and Hans von Sponeck,
>who resigned in succession over sanctions, both
>dispute this. The infrastructure was degraded by the
>west and distribution suffered. In addition, some
>medicines and equipment are useless without others.
>Much is lost through spoilage during power cuts. In
>fact, von Sponeck stated, "We have found no evidence
>that there is a conscious withholding of medicines
>ordered by the government."
>
>It is possible that such a policy exists. Certainly,
>Saddam has a cavalier disregard for the suffering of
>his own people. He boasts to them of how he enjoys his
>lavish lifestyle, free from the ravages that sanctions
>and bombs have brought to ordinary Iraqis. He feasts
>while they suffer. Perhaps he does withhold medicines.
>But how would that boost the case of the dwindling
>number of politicians who support the sanctions? It
>further demonstrates that the 10-year war we have
>waged against his people, while ostensibly having "no
>quarrel" with them, is all grist to the mill as far as
>he is concerned. That is why all the voices for change
>in Iraq, and all Saddam's opponents in exile, are
>telling us to stop.
>
>The west certainly has a curious notion of what it is
>not to have a quarrel with someone. I suppose in the
>sense of fisticuffs over a Leylandii tree, it is not a
>quarrel. Perhaps extermination is a better word.
>According to Unicef, which as a UN agency is forced to
>tread carefully, sanctions have contributed to the
>deaths of 500,000 children since the Gulf war, and
>800,000 are chronically malnourished. Asked to comment
>on such figures, Madeleine Albright has replied: "We
>think the price is worth it." And it is always worth
>going to her rather than to Robin Cook. The organ
>grinder doesn't mess about. She plays a simple tune
>that's easily recognisable. The monkey leaps about all
>over the place, making a lot of silly noises.
>
>So let's listen to Washington rather than Westminster.
>Albright told us in 1997: "We do not agree ... that if
>Iraq complies with its obligations concerning weapons
>of mass destruction sanctions should be lifted." In
>1998, former weapons inspector Scott Ritter said:
>"Sanctions only punish the people of Iraq, they don't
>punish this regime." In June this year, the former
>head of Unscom, Richard Butler, said: "We now know
>that using economic sanctions to bring about
>compliance in the weapons area does not work." Deputy
>US national security adviser, Robert Gates, said back
>in 1991: "Iraqis will pay the price while [Saddam]
>remains in power. All possible sanctions will be
>maintained until he is gone." That year, Colonel John
>A Warden III, of the US air force, said that the
>wrecking of Iraq's electricity system "gives us
>long-term leverage".
>
>According to Mike Horn, who flew F-15s in two tours of
>duty in the northern no-fly zone, "You'd see Turkish
>F-14s and F-16s inbound, loaded to the gills with
>munitions. Then they'd come out half an hour later
>with their munitions expended." When US pilots flew
>back over the Kurds whom the no-fly zone ostensibly
>protects, they would see "burning villages, lots of
>smoke and fire". Instructions were not to interfere.
>Someone remind me who this quarrel is with?
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays!
>http://calendar.yahoo.com/
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Want to effectively manage your Accounts Receivables?  Need to
>maximize cash flow?  Now, you can with Freeworks' FREE ONLINE
>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE MANAGER!  Create invoices, track receivables,
>review account statements and much more!
>
>
>http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/Freeworks
>
>


_______________________________________________________

KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki - Finland
+358-40-7177941, fax +358-9-7591081
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kominf.pp.fi

_______________________________________________________

Kominform  list for general information.
Subscribe/unsubscribe  messages to

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anti-Imperialism list for anti-imperialist news.

Subscribe/unsubscribe messages:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________


Reply via email to