From: Rick Rozoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

http://english.pravda.ru/main/2001/02/16/2549.html


Pravda.RU
16:00 2001-02-16

BUSH CALLS HIS MILITARY STRATEGY ?A NEW ARCHITECTURE
FOR THE DEFENCE OF AMERICA AND OUR ALLIES?

?God Bless NATO!? ?When we fight in wars, we have to
fight as one? ?Our light forces must Be more lethal?
and so on?these three examples sum up the tone of the
speech. 
President George Bush made his speech on his new ideas
for the Pentagon in Norfolk, Virginia, where he was
watching US navy exercises. He called his new approach
?a new architecture for the defence of America and of
our allies?. He did not specify where the attack was
supposed to come from.
?We do not know yet exactly what shape our military
forces will have in future, but we do know which
direction we are going to start to follow. On the
ground, our heavy forces have to be lighter. Our light
forces will have to be more lethal. In the air, we
will be able to attack anywhere in the world with
absolute precision, using aeroplanes or systems
without crews (missiles)?.
?We are going to modernise some weapons and equipment,
something which was left for too long. We will do it
judiciously and selectively?(with) new technologies
which will support a new strategy?.
Now we understand his obsession with the Strategic
Defence Initiative. Given an umbrella at home and with
belligerent talk like this ?attack anywhere in the
world?, exactly where ? and how far - is this
gentleman going? The discourse continues :
?God Bless NATO! With the advance in technology, we
can confront the dangers which come in a missile?We
are going to co-operate in the task of peace. In
diplomacy, in technology, in anti-missile defence,
fighting in wars and above all, avoiding wars, we must
work as one?. 
Here is a clear indication of the USA?s awareness that
not all NATO countries support the SDI. France is
openly against it. Germany is apparently not in favour
and NATO is not as united as it once was. NATO?s
behaviour in recent years has turned a substantial
part of the populations in member countries against
the organisation. 
One thing is certain ? the US fighting machine has
good equipment, money and manpower. Yet in virtually
every conflict in which the US Armed Forces have
entered since the Second World War, the result has
seen them running. (We must not forget that in this
conflict, the USA was substantially aided by Britain
and Russia and that 90% of German soldiers killed,
were killed on the Eastern Front).
They ran away from Vietnam, they ran out of Lebanon,
they ran away from Somalia. They bodged a rescue
venture in Iran, they killed 90% of the British
casualties in Iraq, they downed an Iranian passenger
airliner and bombed the Chinese Embassy in
Belgrade.(Sorry!) Even international terrorists like
Osama Ben Ladan can outwit the NSA (National Security
Agency). 
Before the bomb attacks against the US embassies in
Dar-es-Salaam and Nairobi, in the 1990s, the NSA
intercepted Ben Laden?s communications with the
guerrillas who carried out the attacks ? but did not
manage to decode them.
We now all know where we stand and the ?niceties? in
the brief silence before George Bush and Condoleeza
Rice opened their hearts to the world have
disappeared. We have a National Security Advisor who
considers Russia as a threat, as we read in these
pages on 11th February and a President who openly
speaks about ?attacking anywhere in the world?(sic)
and ?fighting in wars? while at the same time building
himself a nuclear shield and talking about defending
America and its allies.

TIMOTHY BANCROFT-HINCHEY
PRAVDA.RU 
LISBON 




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________
 
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
 
General class struggle news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Geopolitical news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________


Reply via email to