From: Bob Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 14:18:53 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Vandana Shiva on "free trade"
Our World is Not for Sale: Stop Corporate Globalisation
Every aspect of life is up for sale,
every aspect of human need and every
form of human activity is being
redefined as a tradeable service.
Health and education will not be guaranteed
to all members of society when they are no
longer democratic rights provided through
public services, but are commodities to be
bought in the market place.
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 14:16:21 +1000
From: Lynette Dumble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [MAI-NOT] Vandana Shiva: "Stop the GATS attack''.
(http://www.the-hindu.com/stories/05031348.htm)
THE HINDU, Tuesday April 3, 2001.
An accord to auction vital resources
By Vandana Shiva
The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) is the agreement being
most aggressively pushed through the ``built-in agenda'' of the WTO through
no new round was possible in Seattle because of people's protests and a
developing country backlash against their exclusion in trade negotiations.
``Services'' include health and education, water and environment, energy and
transport, food distribution and even government public service.
The 1994 GATS categories are:
- Business; Communication (telecoms, postal, audiovisual)
- Construction and related engineering services
- Distribution
- Educational
- Environmental (water delivery, energy, refuse disposal)
- Financial
- Health related and social
- Tourism and Travel related recreational, cultural and sporting
- Transport (sea, air, rail, road)
- and other
Hence every aspect of our lives is up for sale and every aspect of human
needs and every form of human activity is being redefined as a tradeable
service.
The WTO has drafted clever language about GATS being a ``bottom up'' treaty
rather than a ``top down'' treaty because a country can make commitments for
trade liberation in different sectors through progressive liberalisation.
Not a `bottom up' treaty
A treaty that totally bypasses national democratic decision- making and
excludes citizen participation can hardly be called ``bottom up''. To be
truly `bottom up', the rules and subject matter of GATS need to first be
discussed among local communities and regional and national parliaments.
They then need to be amended on the basis of democratic feedback. Without
such a ``democracy round'', GATS is not a `bottom up' but a `top down'
agreement being forced on the people of the world. The fact that
governments, as members of WTO, are putting the lives and securities of
their citizens on auction to global corporations through GATS does not make
the agreement legitimate or reflecting the will of people. GATS is impinging
on issues of culture, resources and dispute resolution which under some
national laws and constitutions are not under the jurisdiction of federal
governments negotiating in WTO.
The philosophy of GATS is the auctioning of vital resources and essential
services and transforming them from fundamental rights of citizens to
markets for global corporations. Through GATS, in effect our lives have been
put up for sale. Global energy and water corporations such as Enron, Suez,
Vivendi, health and education, businesses such as the health management
organisations (HMOs) in the U.S are pushing for liberalisation of trade in
services. Even mining and logging corporations are riding on the back of
GATS. And corporations trading in hazardous waste are trying to use GATS.
Water privatisation
It is being argued that because this trade is already larger than trade in
merchandise, service sectors should be commercialised and globalised. The
promise is that services would be provided more efficiently and prices of
essential services would reduce. But the experience of water privatisation
in Bolivia, Puerto Rico and Argentina and energy privatisation in California
and Maharashtra state in India shows that this is totally false.
In Bolivia, when public water system was sold to Bechtel and International
water prices increased so dramatically that people protested, six persons
were killed, hundreds injured. Finally, the corporations were kicked out.
In 1995, when water was privatised in Puerto Rico, poor communities had
no water, while tourist resorts and U.S. military bases enjoyed unlimited
supply. In Argentina, when Generale de Eaux got a contract for water
delivery, prices doubled and quality deteriorated. The company was
forced to pull out when people refused to pay their bills.
The WTO briefing of March 16, 2001, entitled ``GATS: Fact and Fiction''
uses four arguments to allay citizens fears that GATS will lead to the
dismantling of rights to water, health and education.
(1.) Art. 1 of GATS excludes ``services supplied in the exercise of
governmental authority''.
(2.) GATS does not oblige countries to privatise or deregulate services.
(3.) GATS does not oblige countries to open up their markets. In what
is termed the ``bottom-up'' approach to liberalisation, governments
can choose which services they open up and to what degree.
(4.) GATS does not prevent countries tightening regulations or reversing
previous decisions to allow service provision by foreigners.
Each of these responses is misleading.
Article I of GATS is recognised as ambiguous and does lend itself to the
interpretation that public services are candidates for privatisation and
liberalisation if services are offered on ``commercial basis'' or ``in
competition with one or more service suppliers.'' Since public services also
have a fee, this could be interpreted as being commercial. Since there are
always private actors in health, in education, this could be interpreted as
being in competition. But small schools and private clinics are different
from global corporations seeking trade liberalisation of services.
The very fact of putting vital service sectors up for trade liberalisation
in the GATS classification for commitments, and allowing the entry of
corporations in sectors which were beyond commerce is forcing the Third
World to lock its essential services and scarce resources into the violent
and unjust dispute settlement and trade sanction system of the WTO.
Robbed of freedom
While WTO repeatedly refers to the ``freedom of countries'', its rules and
rule-making processes rob weaker countries of freedom. Contrary to the
propaganda that WTO rules serve the interests of the poor, the rules are
rules of commercialisation - shaped and defined by powerful corporations
to increase their power and profits.
None of the WTO arguments respond to the citizens' criticism of the
principle of marketisation of essential services enshrined in GATS. That
remains the goal and objective of GATS. The WTO response is a weak attempt
at allaying realistic fears of citizens by using speed of processes of
implementation as an excuse to say the goals might not be reached. But the
fact that a car can go off the road, or not start or start with delay cannot
be used to deny the existence of a highway. GATS is the highway to the
privatisation of our lives, and the highway leads in the wrong direction.
That is the central issue of the debate on trade in services.
How and when different countries start their engines to drive down this
highway is a secondary question. That they might not start at the same time,
or might have different models of cars will not change the fact that once
they are on the road to liberalisation of services, all will reach the same
destination - a destination where water, health and education cannot be
guaranteed to all members of society because they are no longer rights
provided through public services, but are commodities to be bought in the
market place.
The history of the Uruguay Round provides a good lesson of how issues that
do not belong to WTO have been brought into WTO, issues that were never
negotiated or accepted by the majority of members but were forced on them.
TRIPs, agriculture, investment, services are not subject matters of trade -
As the post-Seattle NGO Campaign stated, ``WTO needs to shrink or it will
sink''. The U.S. and European Union pressure to commercialise essential
services through GATS so that their corporations can make money out of the
survival needs of the poor is a new wave of the genocide unleashed through
WTO.
Trade liberalisation of agriculture is killing thousands of farmers, the
TRIPs agreement is denying cures to millions suffering from Malaria, T.B.,
HIV/AIDS. Instead of pausing and taking stock of the destructive impact of
WTO rules of agriculture, written by and enforced on behalf of 5 grain
trading giants and TRIPs rules made by the pharmaceutical and life sciences
corporations, the WTO is rushing headlong into writing new rules on behalf
of corporations wanting to control our water, our health, our education.
That is why, as we move towards the next WTO Ministerial in Qatar in
November, we will be organising and mobilising worldwide with the common
call ``Our World is Not for Sale: Stop Corporate Globalisation''. GATS
should be put into deep freeze. The future of services, and people's rights
to water, health and education needs to be democratically debated within
each society and country. Only after a ``democracy round'', in which
ordinary people can take part, should issues be brought to WTO. Without
democratic debate, WTO agreements have no legitimacy. The citizens' agenda
cannot continue to be preempted by the corporate agenda and then forced
undemocratically on people.
Broad alliances consisting of the women's movement, the environment
movement, the education movement, the health movement, the basic needs and
anti-poverty movements, and the economic and social justice movements are
joining forces to ``stop the GATS attack''. We should be grateful to WTO for
offering us this wonderful opportunity through GATS for building solidarity
across sectors and across the world.
(The writer is Director, Research Foundation for Science, Technology and
Ecology, New Delhi.)
- --
For MAI-not (un)subscription information, posting guidelines and
links to other MAI sites please see http://mai.flora.org/
.........................................
Liberate democracy from corporate control
Bob Olsen, Toronto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
..........................................
_________________________________________________
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
General class struggle news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Geopolitical news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
