Extracts.


US Building Cross-Straits Barriers by Arms Sales

Xinhua News Agency published a commentary titled, "Who Is Building Barriers
to Peace Across the Straits?" Saturday, condemning the United States for its
half- century-long military intervention in and arms sales to the Chinese
island province of Taiwan.
The United States began putting up a military barrier in the 1950s, when its
Seventh Fleet sailed into the Taiwan Straits. Recently, the US government
agreed on a billions-US dollars worth package of arms sale to Taiwan,
including four Kidd-class destroyers, eight diesel-powered submarines and 12
P-3C submarine-hunting planes.
Over the past five decades, the United States has been working hard to erect
a dangerous military barrier against peace across the Taiwan Straits, the
commentary said. 
Xinhua criticized the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, saying that it violates
international law and agreements made with China.
According to the US-China Joint Communique signed on August 17, 1982, the
United States was supposed to halt its arms sales to Taiwan long ago, but it
sold to Taiwan 150 F-16 fighter jets worth six billion US dollars in
September 1992, and advanced weapons worth 1.87 billion US dollars in three
batches of arms sales in 2000.
The US arms sales to Taiwan over the past five decades are intentionally
hostile activities,carried out in the teeth of opposition by China, the
commentary stressed. During that period, Taiwan received 95 percent of its
new arms from the United States.
Since the establishment of diplomatic ties with China 21 years ago, the
United States has sold arms to Taiwan in 47 deals with a total value of over
40 billion US dollars.
US arms sales indicate that long-term separation and confrontation are part
of the US global strategy and complies with its own interests.
The US arms sales to Taiwan are neither legal nor reasonable, Xinhua
commented, noting that for years the Chinese government and people have been
handling Sino-US relations in accordance with international norms and laws,
but China's appeals, based on peace, reason and justice, have never met with
a reasonable response.
China is longing for peace, and the Chinese nation has never been
aggressive, the commentary stressed. It explained that the Chinese
government's refusal to promise to abandon the use of force is in response
to brutal interference by foreign forces.
It reiterated the Chinese government's basic policies of " Peaceful
Reunification and One Country, Two Systems" and its repetitive calls for
holding cross-straits negotiations based on the One-China Principle.
The long-time confrontation across the Taiwan Straits has hurt Chinese
people on both sides of the Straits, as well as the American people, Xinhua
said. The annual Sino-US trade volume has approached 100 billion US
dollars-worth, it said.
War is a double-edged sword, as anyone who triggers a war will be the
greatest loser, the Xinhua commentary warned.

****
Bush's Threat to "Defend" Taiwan Is "Very Dangerous"
An article of Thursday's Straits Times points out that the US President
George W. Bush's vow to "defend" Taiwan is a "very dangerous", with the
serious consequences of Taiwan declaring independence or indefinitely
extending the danger of separation from China.
The article says that Bush recently told ABC and CNN that the US will do its
utmost to "defend" Taiwan, a move that indicates that the US government's
policy on China has experienced a significant change.
It notes that although Bush reiterates the pursuance of the one-China policy
and warns Taiwan not to declare independence, his promise is nothing but a
disguise to whitewash the change in the US policy concerning China.
In his campaign for the US president, Bush announced that if Taiwan was
forced to be unified, the US would defend Taiwan. This has always been an
important agenda of the right-wing conservative party in the US, it says.
"In fact, just before Bush's recent remarks, US Secretary of the State
Powell once said in a Congress hearing that the Japan should be invited to
defend Taiwan together with the US Therefore, Bush's recent speech is not
surprising," it continues.
The article emphasizes that if Bush carries out the agenda of the right-wing
conservative party in an all-round manner, the trouble will not end there.
Bush's new action points to a dangerous possibility, that is, eventually
abandon the one-China principle, it adds.
During the first 100 days when Bush was in office, the Chinese Government
has taken a relatively restrained reaction to the mid-air collision incident
and the US arms sales to Taiwan, it continues.
But if the US president took China��s restraint for granted, that would be
very dangerous, it warns.

****

ARATS President Calls for New Cross-Straits Talks
Wang Daohan, president of the Association for Relations across the Taiwan
<http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/data/province/taiwan.html>  Straits
(ARATS), has called for new cross-straits talks based on the consensus of
One- China Principle reached in 1992.

Wang made the suggestion in the form of an article, published Friday, to
mark the eighth anniversary of his talks with Koo Chen- fu, chairman of the
board of directors of the Taiwan-based Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF),
held in Singapore 
<http://www.peopledaily.com.cn/english/data/singapore.html>  in 1993.

In the article, Wang attributed the success of the talks, known as "Wang-Koo
Meeting," to the consensus which, he said, is a show of the sense of
historical responsibility, sincerity, and goodwill of both sides.

The two sides would not have sat together without consensus as the common
ground, he stressed.

Although the two sides gave different explanations on the political meaning
of one China before national reunification is realized, they shared a common
view on key issues on the adherence to the One-China Principle and made
efforts to seek for national reunification, according to the ARATS
president. 

Wang highlighted the historic importance of the "Wang-Koo Meeting," saying
it fully symbolizes the objective fact that both sides across the Taiwan
Straits belong to one China.

The ARATS leader recalled that his handshake with his counterpart from
Taiwan marked the national identification and feelings. "Wang-Koo Meeting"
made it clear that despite the fact that the two sides have not unified,
neither China's sovereignty nor its territorial integrity has been
separated, he noted.

Wang quoted President Jiang Zemin
<http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/data/people/jiangzemin.shtml>  to
reiterate, "Under the prerequisite of one China, everything is negotiable."

According to Wang, since last year, Vice Premier Qian Qichen
<http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/data/people/qianqichen.shtml>  has
explained many times, "There is only one China in the world; both the
mainland and Taiwan belong to one China; and China's sovereignty and
territorial integrity are inseparable."

The past eight years has witnessed the adverse current of " state-to-state
theory" and the major change in Taiwan's political situation, Wang said.
Currently, compatriots from both sides of the straits are strongly demanding
for stability and improvement in cross-straits relations, he noted.

Like the compatriots living in Taiwan, the mainland sincerely wishes that
the ARATS and the SEF could begin new talks based on the consensus of 1992,
he said. 

Wang criticized the new leader of Taiwan Authorities for its refusal to
recognize the One-China Principle and the 1992 consensus between the two
bodies ever since he took office a year ago.

The mainland values the 1992 consensus and wants to resume the talks based
on it, without any new demands, he said.

Wang criticized Taiwan Authorities' attempts to change the base of "Wang-Koo
Meeting" and new talks between the two bodies. What the Taiwan Authorities
have done is not to "put aside disputes" and seek for resolution but to make
trouble and tension, he noted.

If Taiwan Authorities are sincere to hold cross-straits dialogue, they must
recognize the One-China Principle and the 1992 consensus as a practical
action in efforts to resume the talks, he stressed.

****



Taiwan Affairs Office Spokesman on Taiwan Issue
Nothing, either "Taiwan
<http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/data/province/taiwan.html>  independence"
forces, separatist forces or any foreign forces, can stand in the way of
China's reunification, said a spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the
State Council Friday.

The Chinese people have never given in before foreign pressure or threats,
Zhang Mingqing told a press conference, when answering a question from the
press about U.S. President George W. Bush's recent remarks on the Taiwan
issue. 

A reporter asked Zhang to comment on the remarks that the United States
<http://www.peopledaily.com.cn/english/data/usa.html>  would help "defend"
Taiwan and interfere in the solution of the Taiwan issue with military
force. 

Zhang said that the Taiwan issue is an internal affair of China, adding that
"Taiwan, a part of China's territory, is by no means a 'protectorate' of the
United States." 

He noted that U.S. arms sales to Taiwan and the erroneous remarks of the
U.S. president were a gross interference in China's internal affairs,
serious violation of China's sovereignty and an act to obstruct China's
peaceful reunification.

He said that by purchasing such a large quantity of offensive weaponry, the
Taiwan authorities just want to resist reunification with their weapons.
This would trigger off a tense situation in the Taiwan Straits and would
result in extremely serious consequences, he added.

The wrong decision made by the US government on arms sales to Taiwan will
certainly seriously harm Sino-US relations, aggravate the tense situation in
the Taiwan Straits, and endanger the peace of the Asia-Pacific region, he
said. 

If the Taiwan authorities truly want to guarantee the safety of the Taiwan
compatriots, they should recognize the one-China policy and realize the
reunification of the motherland.

"It is not reliable to depend on foreign weapons or foreigners," Zhang said.
"The plot, which is doomed to failure, will only increase tension in the
Straits." 

Zhang reaffirmed that there will be no way to begin negotiations as long as
the Taiwan authorities do not accept the one-China policy.

****


Thailand, Vietnam to Sign Long-term Cooperation Pact
Thailand and Vietnam are expected to sign a 10-year cooperation agreement on
August 6, when the two countries celebrate the 25th anniversary of their
diplomatic ties, the state-owned TV Channel 3 reported Saturday.
The plan was unveiled by Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra after he
returned from a one-day visit to Vietnam on April 25.
Thaksin said the cooperation pact will cover various aspects including
agriculture, investment and communications.
"As Thailand and Vietnam are world's top rice exporters, both countries
agreed to jointly promote the business on a non-rival basis," he said.
To strengthen bilateral trade and investment, a road project to link
Thailand's Mukdahan province with Danang in Vietnam via Laos will be
accelerated while Vietnam's national flag carrier will increase its flight
frequency to Thailand.
Thaksin also reiterated that Thailand would never allow anyone to use its
territory as a base to sabotage Vietnam.

****

U.S. Travelers in Transit Through Russia to Need Visas From May 6
Russia is to introduce a visa requirement for U.S. citizens traveling
through its territory in transit to other countries as of May 6, the foreign
ministry announced Saturday.
Officials quoted by the Interfax news agency said the measure had been taken
in reprisal for a similar requirement for Russian citizens introduced by the
United States on April 6.
Foreign ministry spokesman Alexander Yakovenko said earlier this month that
Russia "cannot understand the reasons for introducing these new rules."
Relations between Russia and the United States have worsened sharply in
recent months. 




_________________________________________________
 
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
 
General class struggle news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Geopolitical news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________


Reply via email to