From: "Miroslav Antic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The Taipei Times
May 6, 2001

Bush getting pushy with Russia

Moves by the US president to expand NATO right up to Russia's borders
confirm
that the US is in a new period of imperialist expansion and the consequences
will be felt all over

By Jonathan Power

Jonathan Power is a freelance columnist based in London.

As if his Star Wars initiative wasn't enough President George Bush is
already
considering his next provocative move -- the expansion of NATO right up to
Russia's borders.

The world is now in real danger of spinning off its geopolitical axis. Even
a
defeated, militarily moribund, Russia will feel compelled to respond, at
whatever cost of sweat, blood and treasure better spent on development at
home, and the consequences of this will be felt the world over.

It will confirm the leaders of China in what they are already suspecting,
that the US is going through a new period of imperialistic expansion. And
anything that Beijing decides to do reverberates into Japan, Taiwan and the
Koreas and, further afield, into India and therefore into Pakistan.

The initial expansion of NATO in 1999 that took in the former Warsaw Pact
members, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, was in fact the initiative
of President Bill Clinton, a craven attempt to win much needed votes from
the
East European Diaspora in America's Mid-West. The American statesman, George
Kennan, described it then as "the most fateful error of the entire post-Cold
War era."

The historian, John Lewis Gadis, made the most telling criticism: "Some
principles of strategy are so basic that when stated they sound like
platitudes: treat former enemies magnanimously; do not take on unnecessary
new ones; keep the big picture in view; balance ends and means; avoid
emotion
and isolation in making decisions; be willing to acknowledge error ... NATO
enlargement manages to violate every one of the strategic principles just
mentioned."

Despite the virtual absence of Russian aggressiveness and the collapse of
Russian military power, it is clear that a powerful segment of policy and
academic analysts still believes we should be preoccupied with a
hypothetical
Russian threat, perhaps some yet unseen nationalist seizing power and
somehow, out of Russia's grim poverty, rebuilding Russian military strength,
which as we now know, even in its Soviet hey-day was grossly overestimated
by
the CIA.

As Professor Lawrence Freedman recently put it "There is now no particular
reason to classify Russia as a `great power.'"

President Vladimir Putin's dubious attitudes towards press freedom not
withstanding, the Russia of today not only poses no conceivable military
threat it has started to enjoy the virtues of democracy, as became clear in
the last parliamentary election when the dead wood of nationalism on the
right and communism on the left were cut down to their appropriate size.

Indeed by rights the initial expansion of NATO provided plenty of ammunition
to those in the Russian establishment who wanted a more robust military
attitude towards the West. It did not come to pass, which suggests that both
Yeltsin and Putin have bent over backwards not to be provoked.

Yet it does exact its toll. Relations are not as good as they were in the
last years of George Bush senior or the early years of Bill Clinton. As
Professor Dan Reiter wrote in the current issue of Harvard University's
International Security, it has worked to push "Russian leaders away from the
belief that the West is a trustworthy partner in cooperation ? Already
NATO's
Strategic Concept and its 1999 operation in Kosovo have reversed a trend in
Moscow's doctrinal development away from the assumption that there are no
external military threats to Russia."

Even this week's decision by Russia and China to sign a "friendship and
co-operation treaty" symbolizes a real shift in the foreign policies of both
countries, as mutual tensions with the U.S. push them together again. The
Russian news agency Itar-Tass reported that China and Russia have come to
see
themselves as "the main road-block in the way of Washington's global policy
of spreading its influence."

All this is profoundly unnecessary. President Bush's camp is determined to
extend the reach of American power, at the price of being counterproductive.
Their argument that NATO membership strengthens democracy is historical
hogwash -- did membership of NATO have any influence on the lack of
democracy
in Turkey or the military coup in Greece in 1967 or heading off the
attempted
coup in Spain in 1981?

The carrot of NATO membership is unlikely to influence one way or another
the
countries lined up for the next round of enlargement -- Estonia, Latvia,
Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. Since the fall of communism they
have all succeeded in establishing constitutional democracies. If any
international body can secure democracy and even extend it to the likes of
Albania and ex-Yugoslavia it is the European Union.

Including a country in the EU, even if only as a candidate member, works to
strengthen both economic and political reforms. It is this carrot, which is
now visibly coaxing Turkey towards democracy. In the Balkans it could have a
more benign effect than anything NATO can do, either in the way of
membership
or with troops on the ground.

The most telling argument against the need for the expansion of NATO and for
the expansion of the EU is that Russia has never opposed the eastward
expansion of the EU. Indeed from Gorbachev on leaders have suggested that
one
day they would like Russia to be a part of Europe. This idea for the future
obviously works powerfully at the Russian subconscious. How else can one
explain Russia's reasonableness in the face of continued American
provocation?
Miroslav Antic,
http://www.antic.org/


_________________________________________________
 
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
 
General class struggle news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Geopolitical news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________

Reply via email to