TODAY'S NEWS (May.16.2001 Juche 90)
[CONTENTS]
*
Report on delay in construction of light-water reactor project issued
*
Folk song 'Arirang'
*
U.S. forces' pullback from South Korea called for
*
Week of DPRK-Iran friendship opens
*
Closure of U.S. troops' bombing ground urged
*
Koreans in U.S. protest against Japan's distortion of facts in history
textbooks
*
Dangerous U.S.-Japan military tie-up
*
Minju Joson on U.S. loss of membership of U.N. commission on human rights
For Spanish-speaking people
*
vocero de comite de medidas de resarcimiento de danos por inundaciones de
rpdc responde
*
establecimiento de relaciones diplomaticas entre rpdc y holanda
*
victoria siempre con poderio de unidad monolitica
*
dirigente kim jong il envia mensaje de felicitacion a camarada fidel castro
ruz
Report on delay in construction of light-water reactor project issued
��� Pyongyang, May 16 (KCNA) -- The Korean Central News Agency today
releases, upon authorization, the following detailed report on the too much
delay in the construction of the LWR project under the DPRK-U.S. agreed
framework: The agreed framework, adopted on October 21, 1994 is a binding
legal document in which the two governments are committed to resolve
"nuclear issue", remove mistrust and build confidence between the two
countries and move towards improved relations between the two nations.
��� The central point of the framework is the DPRK pledge on nuclear freeze
versus the U.S. pledge on the provision of light water reactors.
��� Under the agreed framework, the DPRK is obliged to freeze the
graphite-moderated reactors and their related facilities whereas the U.S. is
obliged to supply LWRs to the DPRK.
��� The agreed framework specifies as follows:
��� "In accordance with the October 20, 1994 letter of assurance from the
U.S. President, the U.S. will undertake to make arrangements for the
provision to the DPRK of a LWR project with a total generating capacity of
approximately 2,000mw(e) by a target date of 2003. ...
��� Upon receipt of U.S. assurances for the provision of LWRs and for
arrangements for interim energy alternatives, the DPRK will freeze its
graphite-moderated reactors and related facilities and will eventually
dismantle these reactors and related facilities."
��� The U.S. commitment under the agreed framework on provision of light
water reactor power plants with a generating capacity of 2,000mw(e) by the
year 2003 was based on the DPRK freezing of graphite-moderated reactors
under construction and giving up of a new project on power plants.
��� At the time, we were about to complete the construction of
graphite-moderated reactors with a generating capacity of 50mw(e) and
200mw(e) each, relying on local raw materials, technology and natural
resources. At the same time, we were proceeding with the plan to construct
atomic power plants with a generating capacity of several hundreds of
thousands of kilowatts of electricity a year starting from 1997 in an effort
to ensure production of 2,000mw(e) annually by the year 2003.
��� The 7th session of the 9th Supreme People's Assembly held in April 1994
adopted a decision to finish off the atomic power plants under construction
as early as possible and embark on a new power plant project with reinforced
efforts in order to solve the acute shortage of electricity in the country.
��� An inevitable historical background made us proceed with
graphite-moderated reactor project.
��� The former Soviet Union was reluctant to offer us a LWR, while offering
supplies to her satellite states, for the reason that we did not join
COMECON.
��� We then tried to purchase it from western countries such as Canada but
ended up with empty hands due to political reasons.
��� We determined to live our own way and made public the policy on building
nuclear power industry suited to the actual conditions of our country and
embarked on developing our own technology related to the nuclear power
industry relying on uranium and graphite easily available in the DPRK.
��� After long-drawn strenuous efforts, we developed a technology of
graphite-moderated reactor and succeeded in building one.
��� However, the U.S. began to spread the "nuclear suspicion" on our
graphite-moderated reactor and eventually came up with creating "nuclear
crisis."
��� This was how the DPRK-U.S. bilateral talks on "nuclear issue" came to
take place and they were driven into stalemate due to the hostility and
mistrust that existed between the two nations for such a long time.
��� It was against this backdrop that in June 1994 President Kim Il Sung
gave audience to the visiting former U.S. President Jimmy Carter.
��� At the meeting, the President told Carter that the outbreak of the issue
on "nuclear suspicion" was grounded in the misunderstanding and distrust
between the DPRK and the U.S.
��� The resolving of this issue depended entirely on how much confidence the
U.S. had in the DPRK and that the U.S. provision of lwr would clear away
misunderstanding and distrust between the two nations.
��� Carter indicated the U.S. willingness to supply LWRs to the DPRK.
��� This led to the conclusion of the agreed framework at the DPRK-U.S.
bilateral talks with major emphasis on the DPRK nuclear freeze versus the
U.S. supply of LWRs defusing the crisis eventually.
��� Both the DPRK and the U.S. had expected that the freeze on the
graphite-moderated reactors and their related facilities would address the
U.S. security concerns, while the U.S. LWR supply would help remove the DPRK
mistrust of the U.S. and promote confidence-building between the two
nations.
��� To that end, we entered into complete freeze on the graphite-moderated
reactors and their related facilities within one-month period as is spelled
out in the agreed framework, and allowed the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) to monitor the freeze, while rendering full cooperation to the
agency.
��� In addition, we completed the safe storage of spent-fuel rods out of
5mw(e) experimental atomic reactor as obligated under the agreed framework.
��� After all, we have lived up to our obligation under the agreed framework
over 100 percent.
��� But, the construction of lwr power plants the U.S. pledged to complete
by the year 2003, witnesses too much delay making it difficult to expect its
completion.
��� When we look back on the lwr project during the past seven years since
the birth of the agreed framework, only a ground-breaking ceremony took
place as late as august 1997 and the site preparation scheduled to be
finished in 14 months has been made about 95 percent, while ground work is
yet to begin.
��� It is not accidental that some speculate the completion of lwr project
as hardly possible by the year 2008 and may be feasible only by the year
2010.
��� Now that the lwr project is unlikely to be completed by the year 2003,
the implementation of the agreed framework has reached a serious pass.
��� In the light of the level of the present DPRK-U.S. relations and the
unique nature of the agreed framework, the delay in the lwr project may lead
to the scrapping of the agreed framework itself.
��� The very nature of the DPRK-U.S. relations, based on hostility, not on
confidence, resulted in the stipulation of the DPRK nuclear freeze and the
U.S. LWR provision as simultaneous actions in the agreed framework.
��� The failure by the U.S. to live up to its obligation to LWR project by
the year 2003 would possibly drive us to respond to it with abandoning
on-going nuclear freeze.
��� We cannot sit idle over our loss while maintaining the nuclear freeze.
��� Many years have passed since the adoption of the DPRK-U.S. agreed
framework, yet the DPRK-U.S. relations are still characterized by distrust
and misunderstandings and they have grown stronger since the emergence of
the new administration in the U.S.
��� One can recall that the DPRK-U.S. agreed framework was made possible
owing to the courageous decision made by our side to sacrifice our
self-reliant nuclear power industry.
��� We made such political concession out of the good faith to help remove
the U.S. concerns on "suspicion about nuclear-weapons development" and build
confidence between the two nations.
��� However, when we trace back the process of delay in the construction of
the LWR project by the U.S., we emerge with increased suspicion on the U.S.
intention as to whether the U.S. is truly committed to the supply of LWRs or
seeking some kind of filthy political purposes.
��� Since the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO) aimed
at supplying LWRs to the DPRK was organized on March 9, 1995, the U.S. has
delayed its process by far citing internal reasons such as fund sharing and
so on.
��� Moreover, the U.S. deliberately delayed the process of the project
raising such political issues as "missile issue" and "suspicion of
underground nuclear facilities" which had nothing to do with the lwr
project.
��� The responsibility for the delay in the supply of LWRs entirely rests
with the U.S. side, the direct party to the agreed framework.
��� It would be a mistake for the U.S. if it tries to evade the
responsibility for the delay in the LWR project for the reason that KEDO
undertakes the project.
��� The agreed framework specifies as follows:
��� "The U.S. will organize under its leadership an international consortium
to finance and supply the lwr project to be provided to the DPRK. The U.S.,
representing the international consortium, will serve as the principal point
of contact with the DPRK for the LWR project."
��� Under the agreed framework, the U.S. side was authorized to organize an
international consortium so as to secure fund and equipment for the
construction of LWRs and the U.S., representing the international
consortium, is entirely responsible for the completion of the LWR project.
��� On December 14, 1995 the U.S. side also signed the supply agreement
which specifies that the U.S., as the principal contact point with the DPRK,
is to provide LWRs to the DPRK on loan and turnkey basis.
��� The only thing we are expected to do is to receive the key upon its
completion.
��� The U.S. President wrote as following in his letter of assurance dated
October 20, 1994:
��� "In the event that this reactor project is not completed for the reasons
beyond the control of the DPRK, I will use the full powers of my office to
provide, to the extent necessary, such a project from the united states,
subject to the U.S. congress."
��� The U.S. administration should have taken other steps earlier in an
effort to meet the date of completion in the year 2003 true to the assurance
made by the President.
��� Nonetheless, we see no steps taken by the U.S. administration in the
efforts thus far.
��� What the U.S. side should do at this point is to come up with steps to
cover the loss of 2,000mw(e) we are to suffer from the year 2003 due to the
delay in the LWR construction.
��� It would be a misunderstanding if the U.S. thinks it covers the entire
loss caused by the delay in the LWR project by delivering 500,000 mts of
heavy fuel oil annually at present.
��� Under the agreed framework, the U.S. delivery of the 500,000 mts of HFO
pending the completion of the first LWR is to offset electricity loss to be
incurred by the freeze of graphite-moderated reactors with a generating
capacity of 50mw(e) and 200mw(e) each, which were near completion at the
time of the adoption of the agreed framework.
��� Accordingly, the annual delivery of 500,000 mts of HFO can not offset
2,000mw(e) loss caused by the freeze of construction of our atomic power
plants scheduled to be completed by the year 2003.
��� At the DPRK-U.S. talks held in New York in March 2000, we laid out our
proposal on compensation for electricity loss resulting from the delay in
the lwr project.
��� We made clear that the compensation for electricity loss should be made
by electricity and that other member countries of KEDO could contribute to
this effort if the U.S. is in a real difficult position to make that
compensation.
��� We also proposed to get down to working discussion with the party
concerned once an agreement is reached in principle between the DPRK and the
U.S.
��� The U.S. can not escape from its responsibility to compensate for the
electricity loss to be incurred by the delay in the lwr project in any case.
��� If one side fails to meet its obligation, it should compensate for the
loss resulting from non-compliance to other side.
��� It is the acknowledged norm and being practiced among the countries and
is not subject to any alteration with the change in power.
��� Despite all this, officials in the new U.S. administration merely talk
about the revision of the framework and supply of thermal power plants,
while making no response to our demand for electricity.
��� We can only interpret the U.S. claim for the revision of the framework
as an attempt to evade its responsibility for the delay in the lwr project
and an indication of its intention to lead it to its breakdown, given that
the central point in the framework is the DPRK nuclear freeze versus the
U.S. LWR supply.
��� Under the circumstances where the LWR project has been delayed by far, a
serious issue is presented as to whether the U.S. is going to make due
compensation for the electricity loss caused by the freeze of
graphite-moderated reactors by the year 2003 or skip it over without making
compensation.
��� If the U.S. goes without compensation, it would possibly create the
situation where we have to reoperate the graphite-moderated reactors.
��� In the light of the sentiments of our army and people, we can not allow
the U.S. to go without any compensation to us on any account.
��� If the U.S. side fails to meet its obligation to the provision of LWR
project and tries to evade its responsibility to make due compensation for
our electricity loss, it will only compel us to go our own way.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Folk song 'Arirang'
��� Pyongyang, May 16 (KCNA) -- The folk song "Arirang" is a universal
favourite for the Koreans, be it in the north, south or abroad. It is always
on their lips at inter-Korean talks on reunification and inter-Korean sports
contests. Spiced with exquisite national flavour, this traditional song has
some peculiarities from province to province.
��� Part of its lyric runs:
��� Arirang Arirang Arariyo
��� I am crossing Arirang pass
��� You who have deserted me shall suffer
��� Footsore within a couple of miles.
��� The gentle, soft and mellow music is truthfully charged with the
emotional sentiment of Korean ancestors.
��� The origin of the song has many divergent varieties, of which the most
substantial is a legend of Song Bu and Ri Rang. As the legend relates, Ri
Rang, a hired hand at a rural landlord's, elopes with his girl-friend Song
Bu, a fellow hand, into the deep mountains where they set up home.
��� Later the man sets out to fight the corrupt rulers, bidding farewell to
his wife.
��� The wife, left alone, is racked with agonising sobs at the sight of her
beloved going across the pass. "You who have deserted me shall suffer
footsore within a couple of miles" shows the pitch of her anguish at
parting, and she sings over and over again every day, musing on the pass her
husband crossed. Her call "Ah Ri Rang " was handed down for ages before it
became "Arirang" by the late 19th century.
��� The melody flows in a slow rhythm of crescendo= in the fore part it is
an alternating slight swell and down until it reaches the climax in an
impassioned peak-vein of defiant emotion.
��� Originally, the song had a streak of resistance to the feudal ruling
caste, and by the period of Japanese colonial rule, it took up the feelings
of upright national soul.
��� Since the country's bisection by foreign forces, it has been popular at
reunification-oriented event as a messenger of Koreans' wish for reunion.
��� This fine national heritage boosts the national emotion by aid of a
rich, varied and upbeat Korean melody.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. forces' pullback from South Korea called for
��� Pyongyang, May 16 (KCNA) -- Yun Song Sik, a permanent member of the
consultative council of former South Korean politicians in the north for the
promotion of peaceful reunification, was interviewed by KCNA on Tuesday on
the occasion of the 21st anniversary of the heroic Kwangju popular uprising.
The uprising was an anti-fascist resistance offered by South Korean youth
and students and other people in May 1980 in protest against the criminal
moves of the U.S. imperialists and the Chun Doo Hwan group to revive the
fascist "Yusin" dictatorial system in South Korea.
��� Yun, who was active as a member of the fact-finding committee of the May
18 Kwangju popular resistance in South Korea, recalled the monstrous
massacres committed in Kwangju during the resistance under the U.S. zealous
behind-the-scene manipulation.
��� He continued:
��� The Kwangju incident convinced the South Korean people that the U.S. is
neither their "friend" nor their "protector" and as long as the Yankee
aggression forces remain in South Korea, it is impossible to achieve the
sovereignty of the nation, democratization of society and the peaceful
reunification of the country.
��� There is no justification for the u.s. forces to remain in South Korea
any longer.
��� The U.S. should properly judge the trend of the times and opt for the
pullback of its forces from South Korea. I am convinced that the patriotic
people from all walks of life in South Korea will more valiantly turn out in
the anti-U.S. resistance for driving the U.S. forces out of South Korea in
order to wreak the Kwangju people's grudge and bring earlier the day of
national reunification.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Week of DPRK-Iran friendship opens
��� Pyongyang, May 16 (KCNA) -- A rally for opening a week of the DPRK-Iran
friendship was held here yesterday on the occasion of the 12th anniversary
of leader of the Iranian Islamic Revolution Seyed Ali Khamenei's visit to
the DPRK. Present there were minister of labour ri won il who is chairman of
the DPRK-Iran Friendship Association, Kim Jin Bom, vice-chairman of the
Korean Committee for Cultural Relations with Foreign Countries, and
officials concerned.
��� Gholamali Yahyazadeh, Iranian charge d'affaires ad interim here, and
embassy officials were present on invitation.
��� Speeches were made at the rally.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Closure of U.S. troops' bombing ground urged
��� Pyongyang, May 16 (KCNA) -- The all people measure committee for
closure of the U.S. troops' bombing ground in Maehyang-ri, South Korea, held
a rally before the U.S. army unit in Ryongsan, Seoul, on May 12, at which it
demanded the total closure of the bombing ground and compensation for the
damage done to the residents in Maehyang-ri by making deafening noises,
according to MBC from Seoul. At the end of the rally more than 500
Maehyang-ri villagers and members of the committee staged an arm-in-arm
demonstration in front of the Ministry of National Defence.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Koreans in U.S. protest against Japan's distortion of facts in history
textbooks
��� Pyongyang, May 16 (KCNA) -- About 100 Koreans in the U.S. staged a
protest demonstration in front of the Japanese embassy in Washington on May
11, according to a foreign press report. The protesters affiliated to some
10 organizations carried placards bearing letters calling for a stop to the
education in distorted history and holding that Japanese children should be
let to know about facts in the past.
��� They presented a document to the Japanese embassy, urging the Japanese
government to correct the distorted historical facts in the history
textbooks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dangerous U.S.-Japan military tie-up
��� Pyongyang, May 16 (KCNA) -- The chairman of the U.S. joint chiefs of
staff and his Japanese counterpart at a confab at the U.S. department of
Defense on May 11 agreed to strengthen U.S.-Japan military tie-up through
the escalated joint exercises in the Asia-Pacific region. They also agreed
to hasten joint researches into the criminal TMD.
��� They decided to push forward the work of drawing up a framework of
bilateral cooperation to "cope with an 'emergency' on the Korean peninsula,"
in particular.
��� This clearly proves that the U.S. and Japan are running amuck to
establish TMD at an early date and complete the preparations for a war of
aggression under the pretext of the "emergency" on the Korean peninsula.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minju Joson on U.S. loss of membership of U.N. commission on human rights
��� Pyongyang, May 16 (KCNA) -- The U.S. failed in a recent election to the
U.N. commission on human rights, losing its membership which it has
maintained for over half a century. In this regard Minju Joson today in a
signed commentary says:
��� This is a deserved punishment to the U.S.
��� The world public is unanimous in commenting that the U.S. recent defeat
was a manifestation of world "displeasure with its insolent behaviours" such
as forcing its unilateral "human rights standards" on other countries though
it has not signed world conventions on human rights. The defeat cannot but
be a "humiliating blow" to the U.S. However, the U.S. is describing the
election results as a "ruthless one," asserting that it would continue to
pursue its policy. It seems that by doing so it seeks to save its face as a
"superpower." But it is as foolish an act as trying to support a collapsing
pillar with rotten straws.
��� The U.S. can never save its face with such shameless and arrogant
practices.
��� It is well advised to draw a serious lesson from the election results
and have a proper option. only this will help it redeem the disgrace and
defeat it suffered in the international arena.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Spanish-speaking people
------------------------------------------------------------------------
vocero de comite de medidas de resarcimiento de danos por inundaciones de
rpdc responde
��� pyongyang, 16 de enero (atcc) -- al responder a la pregunta de un
reportero de la agencia telegrafica central de corea relativa a la carta de
disculpa que hizo llegar el comite "cap anamur", organizacion de asistencia
no gubernamental de alemania por el disparate del ex-representante de su
oficina en pyongyang, el vocero del comite de medidas de resarcimiento de
danos por inundaciones de la republica popular democratica de corea dijo
ayer como sigue: como se ha conocido ya, el comite "cap anamur" tomo las
medidas de revocar a norbert vollertsen, ex-representante de su oficina en
pyongyang al reconocer que el acto de este ajeno a la labor de asistencia
contraviene al principio de asistencia humanitaria de su organizacion.
��� no obstante eso, norbert en el camino de regreso a su pais ofrecio una
"conferencia de prensa" en la cual tergiverso gravemente la realidad
diciendo que los materiales donados a la rpdc "se usan exclusivamente" para
otros fines y se atrevio a proferir palabras difamatorias al regimen
socialista de la rpdc.
��� en fin, el trato de divulgar algunas opiniones malsanas en la
desesperada intencion de remediar la miserable situacion en que se halla
siendo revocado al cabo de hacer travesuras en la rpdc.
��� al respecto "cap anamur" hizo llegar una carta en la cual senala: la
locura del representante revocado no puede representar jamas la posicion de
su organizacion, se le pide sinceramente disculpa al pueblo coreano,
respetara el regimen de la rpdc, observara las leyes y ordenes de esta y a
traves de la labor de asistencia contribuira activamente al desarrollo de
las relaciones binacionales.
��� en el futuro tambien nosotros no perdonaremos jamas a quienes desacatan
la soberania de la rpdc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
establecimiento de relaciones diplomaticas entre rpdc y holanda
��� pyongyang, 16 de enero (atcc) -- fueron establecidas relaciones
diplomaticas entre la republica popular democratica de corea y el reino de
holanda y fue publicado ayer el comunicado conjunto sobre el particular que
senala: tuvieron lugar el 20 de diciembre del 2000 y el 15 de enero del 2001
en la haya conversaciones entre los delegados de los ministerios de rr.ee.
de la rpdc y el reino de holanda.
��� las conversaciones fueron preparadas a traves del intercambio de las
cartas de los cancilleres de ambos paises relativas al establecimiento de
las relaciones diplomaticas.
��� en ellas las partes acordaron establecer las relaciones diplomaticas a
nivel de embajador entre la rpd de corea y el reino de holanda a base de los
convenios de viena sobre las relaciones diplomaticas y las relaciones
consulares.
��� las partes manifestaron la esperanza de que el establecimiento de las
relaciones diplomaticas entre ambos paises ofrezca oportunidad mas favorable
para desarrollar eficazmente las relaciones bilaterales y profundizar la
consultacion sobre los problemas de interes e inquietud mutuos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
victoria siempre con poderio de unidad monolitica
��� pyongyang, 16 de febrero (atcc) -- hoy el pueblo coreano conmemora
significativamente el cumpleanos del gran dirigente kim jong il. para el
pueblo coreano el 16 de febrero es la fecha historica que promete el
radiante porvenir de la patria y la victoria siempre de la causa
revolucionaria del juche.
��� el diario "rodong sinmun" en el numero de hoy inserto un editorial
senalando que la trayectoria revolucionaria del pueblo coreano bajo la
direccion del gran camarada kim jong il es la gloriosa historia que allano
el camino de victoria con la unidad monolitica.
��� a continuacion el editorial senala:
��� el camino de la victoria recorrido por el partido del trabajo y el
pueblo de corea es el camino de la orgullosa lucha por el cual el dirigente
y el pueblo avanzaron audazmente compartiendo la idea y el proposito, el
camino de la armonia completa por el cual el primero y el segundo avanzaron
fiandose y apoyandose firmemente y la historia de lucha por la unidad en la
cual ambos compartieron el destino, es decir, la vida y la muerte, la
tristeza y la alegria. el factor decisivo que permite acelerar hasta el fin
la marcha victoriosa del siglo 21 en que habra pruebas y dificultades reside
en la unidad monolitica en torno al gran dirigente.
��� la unidad monolitica de las filas revolucionarias sirve de la fuerza de
impulsion que permite a la revolucion coreana seguir avanzando a paso firme
por el unico camino de la independencia.
��� la unidad monolitica del partido del trabajo y el pueblo de corea
constituye la fuerza motriz que permite llevar a feliz termino la causa
socialista del juche.
��� con la invencible unidad monolitica alcanzada en la batalla por la
defensa del socialismo no nos habra cosas irrealizables ni fortaleza
inconquistable en la construccion socialista. el presente sera un siglo en
que la politica de unidad del camarada kim jong il cree una gran realidad y
en que el socialismo coreano triunfe globalmente.
��� debemos avanzar tenazmente por el camino de la victoria en pleno acato a
la politica del gran camarada kim jong il.
��� el periodico "minju joson" en un editorial subraya que es infinitamente
radiante el futuro del pueblo coreano que allana el camino del avance del
nuevo siglo siguiendo la direccion del gran camarada kim jong il.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
dirigente kim jong il envia mensaje de felicitacion a camarada fidel castro
ruz
��� pyongyang, 16 de abril (atcc) -- el gran dirigente kim jong il,
secretario general del partido del trabajo de corea envio ayer un mensaje al
camarada fidel castro ruz, primer secretario del cc del partido comunista de
cuba felicitando el 40 aniversario de su fundacion. el mensaje senala:
��� con motivo del 40 aniversario de la fundacion del pcc envio calurosa
felicitacion y salutacion fraternal a usted, el cc del pcc, todos sus
militantes y el pueblo.
��� durante estos 40 anos el pcc ha logrado grandes exitos en su lucha por
defender la soberania del pais y acelerar la construccion socialista
frustrando las perversas maquinaciones de agresion, intervencion y bloqueo
de los imperialistas.
��� convencido de que en el futuro se fortaleceran las relaciones de amistad
y cooperacion entre nuestros dos partidos en la lucha comun contra el
imperialismo y por la independencia y el socialismo formulo votos por nuevos
exitos en su sagrada labor.
_________________________________________________
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
General class struggle news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Geopolitical news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
