[Via... http://www.egroups.com/group/Communist-Internet ]
.
.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Downwithcapitalism <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:27 PM
Subject: [downwithcapitalism] Reaction in Nepal after CPN(M) article



Associated Press; Kantipur; Rediff. 6 June 2001. Editor, Publishers of
Nepal's Largest Paper Arrested; Maoist ideologue blames India, US for
massacre. Combined reports.


KATHMANDU  Police today under the charges of "treason" arrested
Managing Director of Kantipur Publications Kailash Sirohiya, Director
Binod Gyawali and Editor-in-Chief of Kantipur, a national Nepali daily
Yuvaraj Ghimire.

Police alleged the Nepali daily Kantipur of state offence on publishing
an article written by underground Maoist leader Dr. Baburam Bhattarai
today. The article written by Communist Party Nepal-Maoist (CPN-M)
leader Bhattarai has been published in the opinion page of Kantipur on
Wednesday.

The arrests - the first of mainstream journalists since the Nepalese
monarchy lost power in 1990, ceding the way for establishment of a
constitutional democracy - reflect Nepal's unease after two days of
unrest following the shooting deaths of most of the royal family.

"We urge the Royal Nepal Army to leave the puppets installed in the
royal palace and side with the real patriots of the country," Bhattarai
wrote.

Maoist ideologue Baburam Bhattarai has alleged that India and the United
States of America hatched a conspiracy to eliminate King Birendra and
install their stooges in the Royal Palace.

In a signed article in the Kantipur daily, Nepal's most popular
newspaper, he said King Birendra was the "dust in the eyes of American
imperialists and Indian colonialists" as he was "soft to China and the
Maoists".

The Maoists had termed the killings a conspiracy.

In the article, written in Nepali, Bhattarai called on the "Royal Army
officers and youths committed to the service of country and king, to be
involved in the defence of the country though they could not defend the
king. Our hearty request to them is to support the patriotic people of
Nepal instead of followers of colonialists in the palace."

He said "Indian colonialism" had a dream of making Nepal into "Sikkim",
but has now changed into the new design of making Nepal 'Bhutan' and
only then 'Sikkim'.

He accused India's external intelligence agency, the Research and
Analysis Wing of hatching the conspiracy with the support of the Central
Intelligence Agency.

He said that in the background of conflict between America and China,
and the proximity of America and India, "it was more natural for King
Birendra to be dust in the eyes of American imperialists and Indian
colonialists".

After the commencement of the CPN-Maoist's people's war, "he hesitated
to mobilise the Royal Army against Maoists. It was the greatest crime of
King Birendra for imperialists and colonialists."

"Many Marxists called the Maoists royalists. There were similar thoughts
between King Birendra and us, with reference to many national interests.
There was unannounced unity in the approach between us in many contexts.
So, it was natural for the colonialists and their brokers to be
frightened.''

Bhattarai, a familiar figure in Delhi and a trained architect, said the
main contribution of the Shah royalty was "to protect Nepali sovereignty
and freedom by struggling first against English imperialists and later
against Indian colonialists."

"But if any Shah, taking favour of colonialists, dreams to found the
Rana regime," he said, "the Nepalese people will not recognise it."

The newspaper has published articles by Bhattarai in the past.

Conviction for treason in Nepal carries a sentence of three years in
prison and a $40 fine.



<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>


Kantipur. 6 June 2001. Night curfew in Kathmandu, Lalitpur.


Authorities in Kathmandu and Lalitpur have again imposed curfew in urban
areas of both the districts in an apparent attempt to prevent wanted
disturbances at night.

Both Kathmandu and Lalitpur were calm during the course of the day
Wednesday but the reimposition of curfew seems to prove that authorities
are edgy about the situation after two days of violence in some areas of
the city.

It also appears to be a move on part of the government to stem
activities of fringe elements.

During protests and subsequent violence in Kathmandu on Monday following
the crowing of King Dhirendra, protestors were seen coming to the city
centre by bus and truckloads. Unlike Sunday, demonstrations on Monday
and Tuesday appeared to be orchestrated.

An announcement by Chief District Officers of Kathmandu and Lalitpur
said the curfew was  being imposed to protect life and property. The
curfew came into effect at 9 p.m. and will continue until 3 a.m. June 7.

The streets of Kathmandu have fallen silent as motorists and people
headed back to their homes.

















*               *               *               *



 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



Reply via email to