[Via Communist Internet... http://www.egroups.com/group/Communist-Internet ]
.
.
----- Original Message -----
From: Sandeep Vaidya (LMI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: STOPNATO (E-mail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:36 AM
Subject: Iraq's epic struggle [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]


STOP NATO: NO PASARAN! - HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK

--------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
Get a low APR NextCard Visa in 30 seconds!
     1.  Fill in the brief application
     2.  Receive approval decision within 30 seconds
     3.  Get rates as low as 2.99% Intro or 9.99% Ongoing APR and no
annual fee!
Apply NOW!
http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/NextCard
----------------------------------------------------------------------

WORLD AFFAIRS
Iraq's struggle
Despite the sufferings of the past 11 years, Iraq seems undaunted by the sanctions
imposed on it.
JOHN CHERIAN in Baghdad
(Frontline, Chennai, June 9, 2001)
http://www.frontlineonline.com/fl1812/18120630.htm

ELEVEN years after the Gulf war ended, the people of Iraq are still suffering the
impact of draconian economic sanctions imposed on the country by the United Nations,
dominated as it is by the Western powers. As mandated by the international community,
Iraq has recognised the sanctity of the Kuwaiti border and destroyed the weapons of
mass destruction in its possession. The United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM),
which was mandated to find and destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, admitted in
1998 after much painstaking investigation that 95 per cent of such weapons in the
Iraqi arsenal had been destroyed. Scott Ritter, the high- profile American who was the
United Nations arms inspector for Iraq, has said that the country is completely free
of them. U.N. Security Council Resolution 678 explicitly states that once the weapons
of mass destruction are destroyed "sanctions should be lifted". The issue now is Iraq,
and not Kuwait or weapons of mass destruction.
More than 10.5 lakh Iraqis have perished owing to the adverse impact of the sanctions
in the past 11 years. In this period, war or deprivation has claimed at least one
relative of every Iraqi. The infant mortality rate has continued to increase as the
people have been deprived of essential medicines and food.
The international community has belatedly recognised that Washington and a few of its
close allies have been using sanctions as a political weapon in order to undermine the
government in Baghdad. President Bill Clinton explicitly stated in 1998 that the
sanctions would be lifted only after the government had been substituted by a more
pliable regime. His Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, was even more forthright:
she told an American television interviewer that Iraqi children dying because of the
blockade was not an issue and that getting rid of President Saddam Hussein was the
major goal.
A visit to a children's hospital in Baghdad makes clear the gravity of the situation.
The lack of essential medicines has made the suffering unbearable for children
afflicted with diseases such as tuberculosis and cancer and respiratory infections.
Statistics put out by the authorities show an alarming increase in the mortality rate,
especially among children. According to the Ministry of Health, over 6,000 children
under the age of five died in March this year; 2,503 children died owing to
malnutrition, while pneumonia and respiratory infections claimed 2,518, and diarrhoea
1,617. The child mortality rate in Iraq in March 1989, that is, before the Gulf war
started, was only around 350. The mortality rate among people above 50 years has also
increased significantly. The figures illustrate the steady decline of living standards
and health care under the sanctions regime. According to Iraqi experts, cases of
cancer have risen five-fold owing to the use of depleted uranium by t!
he U.S. and its allies in the Gulf war. Hospitals in Iraq do not have the equipment,
the medicines or the finances that are needed to treat advanced stages of cancer.
Meanwhile, attacks on Iraq's sovereignty by the U.S. and the U.K. continue virtually
every day. When this correspondent was in Iraq in the last week of April, U.S. planes
attacked a site that was about 50 km from Najaf, an important pilgrimage centre for
Muslims. Three Iraqis were killed. About 400 were killed in missile attacks by the
U.S. planes that ventured into the so-called "no fly zones" over Iraq.
Iraqis have begun to take these attacks in their stride. In fact, the Iraqi forces are
talking of downing a U.S. fighter plane one of these days. U.S. pilots who have flown
over Iraq recently have reported that they have come "very close" to being hit by
Iraqi anti-aircraft fire. The U.S. planes take off from bases in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait
and Turkey. These countries do not want to give publicity to such missions. Turkey has
at times objected to specific missions, especially the ones that targeted Kurdish
areas in northern Iraq. Turkey has a vested interest in seeing that areas where the
Iraqi Kurds form a majority do not secede from Iraq. Turkey fears that an independent
Kurdish state would give a fillip to the Kurdish rebels on its own soil.
Until late last year, the U.S. Air Force had admitted that it targeted anti-aircraft
batteries that were kept near mosques and other crowded civilian sites. In 1998, U.S.
aircraft bombed and strafed a group of Iraqi shepherds because U.S. analysts
misinterpreted satellite imagery, mistaking a water trough for a missile launcher. In
March, a U.S. aircraft hit a site manned by its own personnel on the Kuwait-Iraq
border, killing Americans and Kuwaitis in uniform. In early May, the Pentagon
announced that it was considering the possibility of stopping flights over the "no fly
zones". Losing aircraft and pilots to Iraqi fire is the last thing the U.S. wants to
happen at this juncture. The Bush administration wants to play a more covert role in
the region, financing Iraqi dissidents and propping up secessionist elements.
Western analysts themselves have concluded that the Iraqi government has never been
stronger in the last 11 years than it is today. The Bush administration's call for
introducing "smart sanctions" is seen as an admission of the failure of Washington's
Iraq policy. The Arab world has almost unitedly turned its back on the sanctions
policy against Iraq. Amr Musa, the Foreign Minister of Egypt, one of the U.S' allies
in the region, said earlier in the year that public opinion in the Arab world had
turned almost 180 degrees on the issue. Iraq's participation in the last two Arab
summits is further proof that its isolation has ended. Hundreds of "humanitarian
flights" from many countries have reached Baghdad, breaking the embargo symbolically.
The much awaited flight from India has not materialised.
Iraq has already re-emerged as a big oil exporter; it is the third biggest oil
producer among the members of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries
(OPEC). It is, in fact, the sixth largest oil exporter to the U.S. However, the bulk
of Iraqi oil is exported through non-conventional channels. Large quantities of oil
are taken by truck to Jordan and Turkey. Washington is aware of this fact but has not
done anything to stop it. It is trade with Iraq that mainly sustains the Turkish
economy. According to Iraqi officials, the bilateral trade is worth around $3 billion
annually.
The other outlet for Iraq is Jordan. The Jordanian economy is doing well by West Asian
standards, thanks mainly to the country's booming trade with Iraq. In fact, many
Iraqis feel that Jordan thrives on Iraq's misery.
The embargo on Iraq has been further undermined by the re-opening of the Syria-Iraq
pipeline in November last year. As many as 150,000 barrels of oil a day can be pumped
through this route, which is outside the area under U.N. control. Some 100,000 barrels
of oil is smuggled every day through the Shatt-al-Arab waterway into the Gulf.
Iraq levies a surcharge on every barrel of oil exported under U.N. regulations. The
companies, some of them American, that buy the oil deposit the money directly into the
accounts of the Iraqi government, despite protests from Washington. Western sources
estimate that the Iraqi government gets an additional $1 billion annually from selling
oil through channels that are outside the supervision of the U.N.
People who travel frequently to Iraq say that the quality of life in the country has
shown a marked improvement in the past one year. Shops in Baghdad are well stocked and
the residents of the capital have started complaining of "traffic jams". New cars,
many of them of American make, are more visible on the wide and well-maintained
streets of Baghdad than before. But the situation is still far from normal. With daily
attacks from the air and the sanctions continuing to bite, Iraqis still feel that the
war is not over. The night life for which Baghdad was famous in the 1980s has not
returned.
There has been a growing emphasis on Islamic values since the Gulf war ended.
According to Narsa el Saddoun, the Editor of Baghdad Observer, Iraq's only English
daily, a puritanical atmosphere prevails in the country in keeping with the difficult
times the people are going through.
But Saddam Hussein's birthday on April 28 was marked by celebrations. More than a lakh
of Iraqis reached the President's hometown of Tikrit that day, which was declared a
holiday. The top leadership of Iraq was present in Tikrit along with the heads of
diplomatic missions. The celebrations were spontaneous and genuine. Saddam Hussein
was, however, not present at the festivities owing to security constraints.
Iraq has known no other leader but Saddam Hussein since the early 1970s. The people
expect him to lead them out from the most difficult situation they have been in since
independence. With many of the factories shut down, the unemployment rate is high.
More than a million highly qualified Iraqis have emigrated. According to Sadoun, many
of them have been forced to work as taxi drivers.
THE "dual use" clause in the U.N. resolutions bars Iraq from importing any materiel
which the West feels can be diverted for military purposes. Under this clause, even
the import of pencils is prohibited. The power grids are in need of an overhaul. Since
power supply is regulated, hospitals are at times forced to function without
electricity. This has affected refrigeration facilities for life-saving drugs. Only
computers of "286" vintage are allowed to be imported. More powerful computers are
deemed dangerous as they could be diverted for military use.
"Medicines come without needles. Import of ambulances is prohibited under the dual use
clause," said Saddoun. Iraq had the biggest pharmaceutical factory in the region which
manufactured the vaccine for the foot and mouth disease in cattle that is now causing
havoc in Europe. Iraq used to export the vaccine to Europe until the Gulf war broke
out. The factory was destroyed by UNSCOM in 1996 on the grounds that it could be put
to "dual use". Iraq is known for its cattle wealth, which needs to be protected
against diseases such as foot and mouth. Said Saddoun: "We were producing the vaccine
for ten cents a unit. Now we have to import it for a dollar and a half."
President George W. Bush seems to be as committed as his predecessors to "keeping Iraq
in its box". The overthrow of the Saddam government continues to be Washington's goal
and the latest attempt is being made under the facade of "smart sanctions". According
to Saddoun, the whole concept of smart sanctions is being propagated with a view to
putting Iraq under the permanent supervision of the U.N.
The larger game plan is also to remove Iraq's oil resources from the control of its
people. Iraq has more than 10 per cent of the world's known reserves of oil. It is the
control over this resource that has made the Iraqi government an important player in
regional and international politics. Washington hopes that if the so-called smart
sanctions succeed, Iraq will have no option but to open its oil sector to companies
from all over the world. Russian, French and Chinese companies have been promised a
stake in the lucrative sector if they go along with the idea of smart sanctions. Under
the smart sanctions, all goods coming into Iraq and every financial deal it enters
into will be strictly monitored.
Iraq has no great expectations from any of the permanent members of the U.N. Security
Council. Saddoun feels that France and Russia will support the idea of smart
sanctions. She points out that China has not exercised its veto whenever the issue of
Iraq and the sanctions has come up. "We do not rely on any one country. Every country
has its problems. Economic cooperation has to be mutually beneficial," said Saddoun.
India is already carrying on trade with Iraq under Article 50 of the U.N. Charter.
Article 50 allows countries that were adversely affected by the Gulf war to trade with
Iraq. Iraq owes around $1 billion to India in unpaid bills dating from the 1980s.
Economic links between the two countries were strong until the Gulf war started.
According to senior Iraqi officials, the major goal of the West now is to make the
Iraqi state irrelevant by denying the government the funds needed for the
administration of the country. Depriving the people of basic necessities such as
power, education and transportation, Washington hopes, will lead to the disintegration
of Iraqi society. Smart sanctions also seek to strengthen the role of the private
sector.
Iraqi officials say that their country has been a strong centralised state since the
1950s, with the state looking after health care, education and the other fundamental
necessities of the people. "If the role of the state is eroded, Iraq will
disintegrate," said an official. According to a senior Iraqi official, the idea of
smart sanctions was first mooted by France two years ago when two high-power
delegations came to Baghdad, making complete financial transparency a condition for
lifting sanctions. Iraq rejected the idea. Iraqi officials say that if they accept
smart sanctions, they would have to submit to a fate that is worse than colonialism.
"Even protectorates have more rights," said an official.
Iraqi officials feel that the military sanctions are equally unjustified. The
sanctions continue only on the basis of the suspicions in Washington. Iraqi officials
insist that they have implemented Resolution 687. Article 14 of the resolution calls
for the establishment of a zone that is free of nuclear weapons and other weapons of
mass destruction in the region. Iraqi officials say that Iraq has cleared its
territory of dangerous weapons but the same is not the case with its neighbours such
as Israel, Turkey and Iran.
Iraq is also facing a threat to its internal security, and the continuing sanctions
could lead to a military vacuum in the region. Neighbouring countries have been trying
to interfere in the affairs of Iraq. Iraqi officials say that Turkey has territorial
ambitions, setting its eyes on parts of northern Iraq, particularly Mosul. Baghdad has
historically been suspicious of Iran's game plan in the region, especially in the
Shia-dominated southern part of Iraq. In the end of April, Iraq said that Iran, after
signing a security agreement with Saudi Arabia, had fired 64 long-range missiles into
its territory. Iraqi officials allege that Washington has given the green signal to
Saudi Arabia to overthrow the government in Baghdad. Iran, according to them, has also
been coopted into the grand U.S. strategy to overthrow the Saddam Hussein government.
Until 1998, the Iraqi leadership believed that complying with the U.N.'s stringent
terms would eventually lead to the lifting of the embargo. They have no such illusions
now and Baghdad no longer cares about the blockade. Iraqi officials point out that
Cuba has survived a U.S. embargo for the last 40 years. "We will face it for 100
years. It will after all be only an American embargo," said an Iraqi official.


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to