From: "Walter Lippmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: [CubaNews] Rep. Ron Paul: Lift US Embargo on Cuba

>From PRAVDA, published in Russia, but
no longer the organ of the Communist
Party. See their explanation below.
__________________________
10:24 2001-08-22

CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL:
LIFT THE US EMBARGO ON CUBA

On June 29, 2001, the Texas state legislature adopted a
resolution calling for an end to US economic sanctions against
Cuba. Lawmakers emphasized the failure of sanctions to remove
Castro from power, and the unwillingness of other nations to
respect the embargo.

Here are some excerpts from the resolution: "The relationship
between the United States and Cuba has long been marked by
tension and confrontation; further heightening this hostility
is the 40-year-old United States trade embargo against the
island nation that remains the longest-standing embargo in
modern history. Cuba imports nearly a billion dollars' worth
of food every year, including approximately 1,100,000 tons of
wheat, 420,000 tons of rice, 37,000 tons of poultry, and
60,000 tons of dairy products; these amounts are expected to
grow significantly in coming years as Cuba slowly recovers
from the severe economic recession it has endured following
the withdrawal of subsidies from the former Soviet Union in
the last decade. Rather than depriving Cuba of agricultural
products, the United States embargo succeeds only in driving
sales to competitors in other countries that have no such
restrictions."

"In recent years, Cuba has developed important pharmaceutical
products, namely, a new meningitis B vaccine that has
virtually eliminated the disease in Cuba; such products have
the potential to protect Americans against diseases that
continue to threaten large populations around the world.
Cuba's potential oil reserves have attracted the interest of
numerous other countries that have been helping Cuba develop
its existing wells and search for new reserves; Cuba's oil
output has increased more than 400 percent over the last
decade. The United States' trade, financial, and travel
restrictions against Cuba hinder Texas' export of agricultural
and food products, its ability to import critical energy
products, the treatment of illnesses experienced by Texans,
and the right of Texans to travel freely."

Encouraged, in part, by this resolution, I introduced a bill,
on July 26, in US House of Representatives, which called for
the lifting of the United States' embargo on Cuba. The
legislation I introduced is representative of true free trade
in that, while it opens trade, it prohibits the US taxpayer
from being compelled to subsidize the United States
government, the Cuban government or individuals or entities
that choose to trade with Cuban citizens.

I oppose economic sanctions for two very simple reasons.
First, they don't work as effective foreign policy. Time after
time, from Cuba to China to Iraq, the US government has failed
to unseat despotic leaders by refusing to trade with the
people of those nations. If anything, the anti-American
sentiment aroused by sanctions often strengthens the
popularity of such leaders, who use America as a convenient
scapegoat to divert attention from their own tyranny.

History clearly shows that free and open trade does far more
to liberalize oppressive governments than trade wars. Economic
freedom and political freedom are inextricably linked - when
people get a taste of goods and information from abroad, they
are less likely to tolerate a closed society at home. So,
while sanctions may serve America's patriotic fervor, they
mostly harm innocent citizens and do nothing to displace the
governments we claim as enemies.

Second, sanctions simply hurt American industries,
particularly agriculture. Every market we close to our
nation's farmers, is a market exploited by foreign farmers.
China, Russia, the Middle East, North Korea, and Cuba all
represent huge markets for our farm products, yet many in
Congress favor current or proposed trade restrictions that
prevent America's farmers from selling to the billions of
people in these areas.

The department of Agriculture estimates that Iraq alone
represents a $1 billion market for American farm goods. Given
our status as one of the world's largest agricultural
producers, why would the United States ever choose to restrict
our exports? The only beneficiaries of our sanctions policies
are our foreign competitors.

Still, support for sanctions continues in Congress. The House
International Relations committee last week considered
legislation that will extend existing economic sanctions
against Iran and Libya for another 5 years. While I certainly
oppose this legislation, I understand the emotional feelings
many Americans have toward nations such as Iran, Iraq, Libya,
and Cuba. Yet we must not let our emotions overwhelm our
judgment in foreign policy matters, because ultimately human
lives are at stake.

For example, 10 years of trade sanctions against Iraq, not to
mention aggressive air patrols and even bombings, have not
ended Saddam Hussein's rule. If anything, the political
situation has worsened, while the threat to Kuwait remains.
The sanctions have, however, created suffering due to critical
shortages of food and medicine among the mostly poor
inhabitants of Iraq.

So, while the economic benefits of trade are an important
argument against sanctions, we must also consider the
humanitarian argument. Our sanctions policies undermine
America's position as a humane nation, bolstering the common
criticism that we are a bully with no respect for people
outside our borders.

Economic common sense, self-interested foreign policy goals,
and humanitarian ideals all point to the same conclusion:
Congress should work to end economic sanctions against all
nations immediately.

RON PAUL
Congressman
(Republican Ron Paul represents Texas' 14th Congressional
District)
Antiwar.com

http://english.pravda.ru/main/2001/08/22/13042.html


     Internet periodical PRAVDA On-linewas registered by RF
Ministry for Press, Television and Media, November 3, 1999.
The registration number is ?? 77-2037. PRAVDA On-line is being
published since January 27, 1999.

     Close corporation "PPAVDA.Ru" publishers.

     PRAVDA On-line was founded by a group of contributors of
"Pravda", standing up for independence of the oldest Russian
newspaper from the Greek partners of the former
editor-in-chief Gennady Seleznev.

     In 1994 most "Pravda" journalists left the newspaper,
controlled by Greek swindlers, and began to contest in court
their right to publish the newspaper. In 1997 arbitrage courts
of all the instances confirmed the rights of "Pravda"
journalists, who united in the close corporation "Newspaper
Pravda editorial staff" to publish "Pravda". But the newspaper
had been enjoying its independent status for a year odd.

     In 1998 after the leaders of RF Communist Party put
pressure upon the judicial authorities and public prosecutor's
instances, the right to the newspaper were assigned to the
Communist Party. Therefore only one "Pravda" newspaper, the
edition, belonging to Communist Party, is being published in
Russia now, though the rights to the trade mark were assigned
to another organisation, and are located in USA now. The
original of the Press Ministry certificate of the newspaper
Pravda, granted in 1991, is kept in Greece. Pravda
contributors had to turn to virtual world: the first in Russia
Internet daily PRAVDA On-line began to come out in 1999. In
spite of the fact that journalists of both editions keep in
touch with each other, we use different conceptions of
coverage of life of our country and abroad. As opposed to the
newspaper "Pravda", which analyses it from the point of view
of the party interests, PRAVDA On-line bases itself on
pro-national approach to the forming of the policy of the
newspaper.


_________________________________________________
 
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
 
General class struggle news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Geopolitical news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________




































Reply via email to