----- Original Message ----- 
From: secr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:42 PM
Subject: [mobilize-globally] [IMF-WB-Protest-Discuss] Proposals for the fence


Subject: 
        [IMF-WB-Protest-Discuss] Proposals for the fence
   Date: 
        Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:16:22 EDT
   From: 
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
     To: 
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>Suggestings regarding how to respond to [IMF -World Bank] 
>"The Fence" break
>down into two 
>categories: (1) Those who want to kick around ideas and
>proposals for an 
>unexpected and creative response and, (2) those who want to
>go over or 
>through the fence or take part of it down... [snip]

    Over the years the central theme that has developed
    at all these 'international meetings', IMF, World Bank etc etc
    has been both of protest and celebration.

    Protest against the policies of those attending the
    'international meeting' and a celebration of the unity
    of those in protest.

    While it is true that the fence - and lets call it by its
    real name; barricade and if I might add a barricade for
    both sides in the contention - has itself become symbolic
    at such 'events' it does remain, at this time symbolic and so not
    the centre of our concern.

    When 100,000 people 'encounter' a comparitive handful
    of 'representatives' they all experience different levels
    of integration or alienation.

    Perhaps what is important is to concentrate on that which
    all are in basic agreement, that is: protest and celebration.

    I wouldn t not mean to imply that the barricade would not
    feature strongly as it always has but that we remain
    aware enough to develop the dual tactics of protest
    and celebration to the maximum degree in accord with
    events as they develop day by day or hour by hour.

    From the 'internation representatives' point of view
    the twin tactics of protest and celebration are potencially
    devastating - just when you are used to being protested
    against you witness the most flamboyant celebration of
    unity.

    At risk of belabouring the point, our strength lies in the
    ability to utilise the two tactics throughout, remaining
    sensitive to developments and switching tac if necessary
    from minute to minute.

    The greater awareness of the movements adopted
    tactics by the greatest number of people will result in
    the greatest success.

    If I might just add, the 'international representatives'
    have absolutely no defence againsed such tactics
    in their attempt to attain their strategic goal.

    Protestata-celebratorally,

    Bill.

    

Reply via email to