From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: [R-G] First Belgrade TV, now Al-Jazeera

http://www.alternet.org/print.html?StoryID=11921

November 14, 2001

"Arab CNN" First Berated, then Bombed by U.S.

     By Laura Flanders, WorkingForChange.com

Here's the text of an upbeat little segment on Tuesday's World News Tonight
on ABC: 

PETER JENNINGS: "Kabul's been a very unpredictable place for the last couple
of days. A colleague of John Simpson, William Reeve of the BBC was
broadcasting live from there today when this happened."

(Video clip shows Reeve at his desk, followed by an explosion.)

JENNINGS: "They don't know if it was a missile or bomb, but they were all
very fortunate and no one was hurt."

To be entirely fair, this exchange followed a longish report on the Northern
Alliance entry into Kabul which showed Taliban soldiers being rounded up and
battered with guns. Of the networks, Jennings alone mentioned that UN
officials had said publicly that "more than 100 young people sympathetic to
the Taliban were killed by Northern Alliance forces at a religious school in
Mazar-e Sharif on Saturday."

But the quick shot of Reeve at his desk would have been much more chilling
for viewers if ABC had told them the story behind the explosion they were
seeing. For this information, we have to go to other sources.

What rattled Reeve at his desk were U.S. bombs that hit two buildings that
housed news media outlets. One hit the Kabul office of Al-Jazeera, the Arab
satellite station. Another hit a house used by the BBC a block away.

Al-Jazeera's come under no end of metaphorical fire since September 11. U.S.
officials have accused the network of being a vehicle for Al Qaeda
propaganda because it broadcasts interviews with Osama bin Laden. (It has
also aired interviews with Donald Rumsfeld and Condoleeza Rice.) On Monday,
the fire was live. 

The Al-Jazeera office was obliterated by U.S. bombing around 3 a.m.,
according to the network's managing director, Mohammed Jassim al-Ali.
Speaking to the Associated Press, he said that none of the network's ten
staff members was injured (the office was empty at the time.) But he did
suggest that the strike could have been deliberate, because the office sits
in a residential area of Kabul.

"I can see no other reason why a bomb would land in that section of Kabul,"
al-Ali told AP. "They know where we are located and they know what we have
in our office and we also did not get any warning."

As Northern Alliance forces entered Kabul, Al-Jazeera was forced to
broadcast CNN's footage of the events.

In the first three days of the attack on Kabul, U.S. bombs knocked off the
air and entirely destroyed the office of Radio Kabul. Appearing on Working
Assets Radio last month, Farhad Azad of Afghanmagazine.com, bemoaned the
loss of the Radio Kabul archives, stored in the basement of the devastated
building. The Taliban made music illegal, said Azad, but it was U.S. bombs
that physically destroyed the hidden archive.

A few years back, NATO justified the bombing of the offices of state radio
and TV in Belgrade by saying that Belgrade TV was a legitimate military
target. "We've struck at his TV stations and transmitters because they're as
much a part of [Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic's] military machine
prolonging and promoting this conflict as his army and security forces,"
U.S. General Wesley Clark explained. (Of course, it wasn't Milosevic who was
killed when the Belgrade studios were bombed on April 23, but rather 20
journalists, technicians and other civilians.)

This time, Col. Brian Hoey, a spokesman for the U.S. Central Command in
Tampa confirmed that U.S. aircraft dropped two 500-pound bombs at 3:40 p.m.
EST Monday on the building in question. But he said they did it based on
"compelling" evidence that the facility was being used by the Al Qaeda
terrorist organization. At the time of the attack, Hoey said, "the
indications we had was that this was not an al-Jazeera office." The Taliban
Ministry for the Suppression of Vice and the Promotion of Virtue is said to
be across the street.

There can be no doubt that the offices of cable network Al-Jazeera were a
civilian target -- as was the house holding the BBC's poor rattled Mr.
Reeve. Bombing civilian targets is barred under just about every
international convention you care to mention. And while Congress never
ratified the 1977 Additional protocols appended to the Geneva Convention,
they did sign on, and successive administrations have committed themselves
to act in accordance with the law.

The Washington Post writes: "An attack on al-Jazeera's offices in Kabul
could prove to be a public relations fiasco for the U.S. government, which
has accused al-Jazeera of broadcasting Taliban propaganda since the war in
Afghanistan began on Oct. 7."

Indeed. But only if the public finds out.


_________________________________________________
 
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
 
General class struggle news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Geopolitical news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________




_______________________________________________
Rad-Green mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green

Reply via email to