From: "Magnus Bernhardsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Subject: [Peoples War] Nepal: Prime Minister stunned, urges Prachanda to
reconsider

http://www.nepalnews.com.np/contents/englishdaily/ktmpost/2001/nov/nov22/ind
ex1.htm#1

Maoists signal breaking away from peace talks
Prime Minister stunned, urges Prachanda to reconsider

Post Report

KATHMANDU, Nov. 21 � After holding three rounds of peace negotiations
with the government, the rebel Maoist leadership today dropped a bombshell:
it announced that the justification for the talks and the four month-long
cease-fire were both over.

Issuing the statement late Wednesday, chairman of the Communist Party of
Nepal (Maoist) Prachanda, a.k.a. "Comrade Pushpa Kamal Dahal" said, "We
make it clear with this statement that our bid to establish peace has been
rendered unsuccessful by reactionary and fascist forces."

Ominously, he also warned that, "due to this situation, the justification
for the cease-fire also does not exist." He emphasised that the doors are
open for the talks under a "new process" without clarifying what the
process meant.

Although Prachanda stopped short of explicitly saying that the rebels are
pulling out of the talks, his statement is being interpreted in government
circles as one which effectively puts an end to the peace talks.

Reacting to the statement, Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba told The
Kathmandu Post, "I am surprised and shocked at his statement. I honestly
urge him to sit for the fourth round of dialogue and not to jeopardise it."
He added it was also the Maoists� duty to ensure that the bloodbath does
not recur in the nation.

The Prime Minister, who has taken some bold moves to appease the Maoists in
recent times, went a step further. "After agreeing for the fourth round of
talks, it is irresponsible and dishonest on the part of the Maoists to pull
out of the talks." He stressed that the talks are essential for the
peaceful solution. 

Some analysts believe that the Maoist strongman put out the statement under
growing pressure from his military wing, especially from Ram Bahadur Thapa
a.k.a Comrade Badal, the main military strategists of the Maoist. Badal and
his men are reportedly sore with the top Maoist leadership for holding
talks with the government.

Prachanda�s signed statement issued today makes it clear that the
government�s refusal to hold elections to a constituent assembly, which
the Maoists have been demanding of late, was the main reason for terming
the talks "fruitless."

We want to make it clear that the imperialist and reactionary forces have
made it impossible to find a political solution to the problem through the
talks," he said in the statement. "This situation has ended the relevance
of the cease-fire�We have no alternative but to continue our struggle
against imperialist forces."

The Maoists, before the third round of dialogue with the government that
was held on November 13, had put on hold their key demand of turning Nepal
into a republic state. However, they have been insisting on the other two
demands, namely the formation of an interim government and holding
elections for constituent assembly. Many in the ruling and opposition
parties believe that it was the Maoists� ploy to achieve their goal of
republic.

In his statement today, the NCP (Maoist) chairman lambasted the
"reactionary forces" for terming their demand for constituent assembly
"needless" and "irrelevant". "We believe that in today�s context, an
election for constituent assembly will achieve a republican Constitution."

Meanwhile, some political parties are urging the government to gird up for
the hard times ahead. Chairman of Rastriya Prajatantra Party Surya Bahadur
Thapa said, "Prachanda has made one-sided allegations and decisions. The
government must now gird up to face the coming situation."




_________________________________________________
 
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
 
General class struggle news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Geopolitical news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  _________________

Reply via email to