----------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (A.Wosni)


> US and British soldiers participate in massacre against prisoners
> By Michael Pr�bsting (www.workerspower.com), 26.11.2001, 2.36 a.m.
> The Northern Alliance forces with the aid of US gunships and probably Special
>  Forces have carried out a brutal massacre against Taliban prisoners on
>  Sunday 25th November. While the exact figures are still not clear reports
>  speak about 500-1000 prisoners who have been murdered in the 19th century
>  fort Qala-i-Jhangi at Mazar-i-Sharif.
>
> Not surprisingly Northern Alliance General Dostum representatives whose
>  soldiers carried out the mass execution and Pentagon spokesman, Army Lt.
>  Col. Dan Stoneking claim they had to put down a riot of the prisoners and
>  deny any wrongdoing.
>
> However here are the facts. Before the supposed riot started the US newspaper
>  Los Angeles Times published a report including the following paragraphs.
>
> "On the western side of the Kunduz pocket, as many as 1,000 Taliban fighters
>  turned in their weapons, Mukhaqiq said, and were being held in the village
>  of Qala-i-Jangy, which has a large prison. He said he did not know how long
>  they would be held there or what their fate might be.
>
> Some observers fear hatred of the foreign Taliban runs so high among the
>  Northern Alliance that Taliban prisoners may face mistreatment or even
>  summary execution, both of which are prohibited under the Geneva
>  Conventions." ("Taliban Streams Out of Kunduz" Los Angeles Times November 25
>  2001) 
>
> Notice that this journalist already noticed the desire of Northers Alliance
>  fighters to kill the foreign Taliban!
>
> According to the Western News agency AP "Stoneking said the fighting involved
>  about 300 "hard-core Taliban" prisoners, most of them from Pakistan and
>  Chechnya. He said some of the fighters had smuggled weapons into the prison
>  compound and began fighting northern alliance forces."
>
> TIME magazine correspondent Alex Perry who was an eyewitness spoke about 800
>  Taliban prisoners involved in the riot.
>
> And a Reuters report on the same day quotes a witness saying "About 500
>  prisoners linked to the al Qaeda network grabbed Kalashnikov rifles,
>  machineguns and grenades and battled their Northern Alliance guards in the
>  fort." 
>
> According to Reuter than "Northern Alliance commander Gen. Abdul Rashid
>  Dostum mustered about 500 of his troops to counterattack the foreign
>  fighters" and in the words of Pentagon spokesman, Army Lt. Col. Dan
>  Stoneking US forces "provided support via airstrikes".
>
> Reuters quotes another Pentagon "official, who declined to be identified,
>  said the non-Afghan Taliban fighters had held the southern part of the
>  complex before the AC-130 gunships and the Black Hawk helicopters helped the
>  Northern Alliance restore control."
>
> Time Magazine correspondent Alex Perry reported from the scene outside
>  Mazar-i-Sharif that at least one American, who belonged to U.S. special
>  operations forces, was missing and presumed dead after prisoners began
>  firing smuggled weapons. If confirmed, it would be the first known U.S.
>  combat death in Afghanistan.
>
> Finally Reuters reported "A U.S. observer in the area said some 40 U.S.
>  special forces troops had reached the fort but could not get inside because
>  of the heavy fighting."
>
> Now there are several suspicious indices and different accounts which point
>  to a brutal massacre or mass execution carried out by Dostum notorious
>  butchers and US and British soldiers.
>
> First it is a well established fact that the prisoners surrendered on the
>  same day. Given that they were so called "hard-core Taliban" Dostums
>  soldiers and US special forces - who according to several reports in the
>  past accompanied Dostums since the beginning of the war - would certainly
>  have checked them for weapons before putting them into prison. New agencies
>  repeatedly quotes Northern Alliance leaders saying that the foreign Taliban
>  would fight to their death. It is therefore nearly excluded that the Kunduz
>  defenders could have smuggled a significant amount of weapons into prison -
>  at maximum very few small weapons.
>
> The second claim of the Northern Alliance and Pentagon spokesman is also
>  dubious. They say that the prisoners took weapons from guards. Again this is
>  possible but only in very small numbers. Can anyone imagine that let us say
>  100 soldiers guarding prisoners can be overwhelmed at once?! If the first
>  few guards have been token by surprise the rest of them would have been
>  alerted. 
>
> Finally while the Pentagon admits that its deadly "AC-130 gunships and the
>  Black Hawk helicopters helped the Northern Alliance restore control" they
>  deny that the 40 U.S. special forces troops present "having reached the fort
>  but could not get inside because of the heavy fighting." Since they went to
>  the fort exactly because of the supposed heavy fighting it is strange that
>  they did not enter the place "because of the heavy fighting". That's their
>  job - isn't it? 
>
> Now fortunately there was a Western eye witness Time Magazine correspondent
>  Alex Perry. He reported that "American and British forces have now joined in
>  trying to quell the attack. (.) There's a hand-full of them. I would say
>  12." According to Perry these Western soldiers were not simply observers
>  "but the Americans are running the show. (.) Well the Americans and the
>  British are coordinating airstrikes from their positions inside the fort on
>  another part of the fort. And they're also directing the commanders inside
>  when to tell their men to attack."
>
> Perry had no illusions about the task of the Western and Afghan forces: "The
>  mission by the Americans and Northern alliance is to kill every single one
>  of them now." 
>
> While it might be possible that the prisoners attempted to escape and even
>  that they possessed a few weapons it is most likely that they were not in
>  any way a match for the well armed Dostum soldiers and US Special forces and
>  gunships. They had no chance. They certainly were promised at the
>  negotiations in Kunduz that they would be treated fairly. What happened
>  instead was a cold blood massacre aided by US troops.
>
> Bush, Rumsfeld and all the other leaders of the world super power made it
>  clear before that they prefer to see Osama bin Laden and the al-Qaida and
>  Taliban fighter rather dead than alive. They kept their promise.
>
>


_______________________________________________
Leninist-International mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international

Reply via email to