From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 17:52:05 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CubaNews] Le Monde: No "Proof" of bin Laden Guilt

Le Monde, Paris, editorial, 5 Oct 2001

Pas de "preuves tangibles" dans le dossier britannique contre ben Laden

In the wave of attacks on September 11 in the United States,
proof of the implication of Oussama ben Laden, made public by
Britain, are not "tangible" and raise as many questions as there
are answers, experts on Friday maintained.

While presenting Thursday a 20-page file of incriminations,
British Prime Minister Tony Blair affirmed that he had
"absolutely no doubt" about the responsibility coming from the
Saudi multi-millionaire. Yet, the file presents no tangible proof
which would be liable to constitute a strong case against him.
Tony Blair has himself recognized that these elements were not
sufficient to consider the condemnation of ben Laden by a
judicial court, but he affirmed that there existed proof "of a
very specific nature" implying his guilt, too sensitive to be
published.

This file of accusations are more "persuasive than convincing",
emphasized William Wallace, professor in International Relations
at the London School of Economics. "It would be extremely
difficult at this stage to construct a sufficiently strong
indictment which could be admitted into a court", he said to the
AFP. But the published proof "brings a good enough indication
concerning the nature of the ben Laden network."

In summary, the file maintains "the clear conclusion" that
Oussama ben Laden and his organization Al Qaida planned and
perpetrated the attempts, thanks to their ties with the Taliban.
The file notably concludes that shortly before September 11, ben
Laden had forewarned his associates that he had prepared "a
sizeable attack against the United States". In the weeks
preceding the attempts, the associates of ben Laden had been
asked to return to Afghanistan on September 10. Some among them
spoke of a "J-day", while mentioning the date on or around
September 11. Finally, according to the file, one of the more
closer and important lieutenants of ben Laden made details
and organized scheduling of the actions in the attacks.

On the other hand, the file doesn't make any mention of several
crucial points which have made its way into the press since
September 11:

- a meeting between one of the main hijackers, Mohammed Atta, and
an Iraqi information officer,

- arrests in Europe in the setting of the anti-terrorist struggle

- bases of the network Al Qaida in Britain and in Germany,

- the " financial " network binding ben Laden in the Middle East,
Europe and the United States,

- similarities between attempts against the World Trade Center
and the tentative aborted attack in 1994 by the armed Algerian
Islamic Group (GIA) to crash a plane by diverting it into the
Eiffel Tower in Paris,

- and a meeting in the beginning of 2000 between two of hijackers
and a key character in Malaysia that might have helped in the
preparation of the attempt against the American naval destroyer
US Cole, in October 2000.

Also, the file remained completely mute on presumed ties of
terrorists with Egypt, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the United
Arabian Emirates. As for the previous attempt against the World
Trade Center, in 1993, it is only mentioned in the context of a
quote by ben Laden that he would qualifiy terrorists as "role
models".

For William Wallace, the file contains much less of a legal
bearing than it acts as a political device, notably to give
confidence to certain allies who are a little reticent, such as
Pakistan or Saudi Arabia, to provide them with some reasons to
support the American position.  "I have absolutely no doubts
about the fact that the Saudi connection passed under a realm of
silence because the least desirable thing is to have a
destabilization of that country ", he explained.

"It makes one think that it is necssary to have much stronger
proofs in order to judge a ruffian who might bring us into a
world war", a comment made in The Times on Friday by Anthony
Scrivener, who is one of the most well-known British jurists.

Associated Press of France(AFP) 5 Oct. 2001, r�serv�s;
(c) Le Monde 2001, usage strictement personnel. L'utilisateur du
site reconna�t avoir pris connaissance de la licence de droits
d'usage, en accepter et en respecter les dispositions.

-----------------
Courtesy of
Nathan Gant
CBIACS


_________________________________________________
 
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
 
General class struggle news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Geopolitical news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________

Reply via email to