From: New Worker Online <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 19:36:15 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [New-Worker-News] New Worker Online Digest - 12/10/2001
New Worker Online Digest
Week commencing 12th October, 2001.
1) Editorial - Stop the war.
2) Lead story - Halt the bombing!
3) Feature article - Peace protests around Britain.
4) International story - Afghanistan - the British connection.
5) British news item - Good riddance to Railtrack.
1) Editorial
Stop the war.
THE most urgent and important task we face today is to demand an
immediate ceasefire in imperialism's war on the people's of Central Asia
and to bring this war to a swift end.
Like all capitalist wars, it will bring untold misery and suffering to
millions of working class and oppressed people throughout the world and
will benefit no one -- apart that is from the rich clique who always pick
out a fat Profit from the bones of war and death.
Already, in the space of just over a week there has been loss of life
and many injuries following the bombing raids on Afghanistan. Blood has
been spilled in the protest demonstrations in neighbouring Pakistan, the
Zionist regime has stepped up its oppression of the Palestinians, and
renewed threats are being made against Iraq.
Workers in the United States, Britain and other Nato countries have not
been told what the war is going to cost. But you don't have to be a
defence analyst to know that it will run into many billions -- and you
don't have to be an economist to know that the belt-tightening and
hardship will ultimately be borne by the working class.
Tax increases to pay for the war will nor be levied on the rich who pay
the highest rate of direct income tax but will almost certainly squeeze
the poorest people through rises in indirect taxes such as VAT and excise
duty.
The working class will suffer in other ways. The recession, which was
well underway before the events of 11 September, is causing large-scale
job cuts on both sides of the Atlantic. This has created deserts of high
unemployment in which many young people are left with little option but to
enlist in the armed forces. Certainly an imperialist war is not in the
interests of these young workers.
The US tells the world over and over again that the purpose of the war
is to stamp out "terrorism". Even if this could be believed it would seem
pretty rich coming from a state that has itself used and sponsored
terrorism in its desire to defeat socialism and the forces of progress,
liberation and anti imperialism everywhere.
But of course these stated war aims are not believable. While it is
certainly true that the US and its allies want Osama bin Laden "dead or
alive", they also want to end the day with Afghanistan firmly under
imperialist control. The new world order programme of US big business wants
this strategically key central Asian state to open a new gateway to the
oil-rich Caucasus and the belly of Russia.
A US catspaw government in Afghanistan would raise anger in the Islamic
republics along its northern border, fire Russia to defend itself,
destabilise Pakistan and rekindle anti-American clericalism in Iran. The
dangers to world peace are obvious.
It goes without saying that self-determination for the people of
Afghanistan is definitely not part of Washington's plan for Central Asia.
In addition, the Washington hawks are increasingly turning their eyes on
Iraq. There is no doubt the US leadership wants Saddam Hussein's head to
sit on a plate next to bin Laden's. These imperialist criminals who have
already murdered millions of Iraqis would quickly find a pretext for a new
war against Iraq if the military planners could only be sure that a second
front would not overstretch the US in terms of American lives. These
monstrous plans must be opposed everywhere.
In Britain, as in many other countries, the movement for peace is growing
and strengthening. Each demonstration is larger than the one before and
local anti-war groups are springing up in towns and cities throughout
Britain.
The threat to peace is grave. The demand for peace needs to shake Downing
Street and be heard in Washington. No to War!
*********************
2) Lead story
Halt the bombing!
by our Arab affairs corresponent
UNITED STATES imperialism. has unleashed its war machine against
Afghanistan launching wave after wave of air attacks throughout the week.
The anti-Taleban Northern Alliance is trying to advance in the north,
beefed up by new military hardware from Russia.
But the Taleban remain defiant and Osama bin Laden, the leader of the
Islamic order blamed for September's devastating terror attacks on
Washington and New York, has given an equally defiant message to his
supporters on Arab TV.
The attack began on Sunday with a volley of Cruise missiles fired from US
warships and the Royal Navy, rapidly followed by air raids on all major
Afghan towns. Some 70 Afghans have died so far, mostly civilians. Angry
anti-American demonstrations in many Muslim countries have been put down
with violence and some Third World countries are already expressing their
opposition to this new demonstration of imperialist might.
Air terror
American warplanes rule the skies over Afghanistan, whose air-defences --
largely anti-aircraft guns -- are unable to hit high-flying aircraft. But
the Taleban know that when the snow comes in mid-October the Americans will
have to fly lower or gamble on a land invasion against seasoned fighters
who know the lie of the land.
The Americans have also been dropping small amounts of "food aid" -- a
cosmetic exercise designed to fool world opinion. These parcels are being
burnt by angry Afghans. "The Americans are killing us and attacking us, and
we don't need this food," an Afghan official dedared.
Imperialist hopes that the Taleban regime would crumble within days have
proved false. Attempts to cobble together a new front between the Northern
Alliance, other mujahadeen leaders and the ex-king of Afghanistan have so
far failed.
The Northern Alliance -- properly the United Front of Afghanistan -- is
still talking about a big push to take Kabul during a lull in the air-war.
Russia has sent them a dozen new helicopter gunships and a Russian defence
analyst in Moscow said this week that between 1,000 to 2,000 Russian troops
were already in Alliance held territory providing technical assistance and
instruction.
Pavel Felgenhauer, in Moscow, also claimed that Russian soldiers were
helping to transport tanks and heavy equipment over the Pyandzh river from
Tajikistan into Afghanistan while other military advisers are manning heavy
equipment presumably artillery -- in the Alliance enclave just 30 km from
the Afghan capital. The Russian Defence Ministry has denied these claims.
Defiant call
In Kabul the Taleban leadership have said their leader, Mullah Omar, and
Osama bin Laden were still alive. They've gone on to lift all restraints on
the Saudi Islamic rebel who has called on his supporters, and all Muslims,
to join in a Holy War against the United States.
On the day war broke out bin Laden released a filmed statement via a
leading Arab Gulf television network. "Here is the United States. It was
filled with terror from its north to its south and from its east to its
west. Praise be to God.
"What the United States tastes today is a very small thing compared to
what we have tasted for tens of years... and in a speech rich with Islamic
and Arab metaphor he concluded "As for the United States, I tell it and its
people these few words; I swear by Almighty God who raised the heavens
without pillars that neither the United States nor he who lives in the
United States will enjoy security before we can see it as a reality in
Palestine and before all the infidel armies leave the land of Mohammed, may
God's peace and blessing be upon him."
PFLP calls for Arab solidarity
Solidarity with Afghanistan is spreading far beyond the traditional
Islamic community. One leading Palestinian resistance movement has warned
that American targets may go far beyond the hills of Afghanistan declaring
that "peace and security cannot be imposed by brute force and aggression".
The Popular Front for the Liberation ofPalestine (PFLP) "calls on the
world community in general, and the American administration in particular,
to take practical steps to stop Zionist state terrorism, which is being
practised in the most ugly fashion; to provide temporary international
protection for our people; to compel Israel to implement the resolutions of
international law that deal with the Palestinian issue; and to end the
practice of using double standards in dealing with international problems.
"The PFLP also calls upon all the fraternal Arab countries and on the
states of the Islamic world not to remain idle as the American aggressive
war, that began yesterday, is waged against the people of Afghanistan, with
the threat that it will be expanded to include other countries in the
region. The PFLP calls on them not to provide any facilities for the
operation of the war".
*************************
3) Feature article
Peace protests around Britain.
THE BEGINNING of the bombing of Afghanistan by United States and British
forces last weekend prompted an upsurge in anti-war protests and activities
all around Britain.
Many are being organised by peace groups that came into being through
opposition to the wars against Iraq and Yugoslavia or support for the cause
of the Palestinian people. These struggles are all inextricably linked.
Colchester
Our New Worker correspondent in Colchester reports that 62 supporters of
peace held a meeting last Friday at Friends House in Colchester.
Among the speeches some statements opposing the war were read out from
relatives of those who had died in the terror attack on New York.
Other speakers raised the question of the Middle East and the role of
Israel.
The meeting agreed to take part in a vigil for peace in Colchester and a
coach is to be organised for the London peace demonstration on Saturday.
Manchester
The Greater Manchester Coalition Against Sanctions and War sent us the
following report:
The Coalition Against Sanctions and War on Iraq is a secular organisation
that was set up in 1997 to actively campaign against and expose the
sanctions policy on Iraq which is killing approximately 5,000 children a
month.
We also campaign against the almost daily bombing of Iraq and the
destruction that causes.
Since 1997, in Manchester we have organised many activities and events,
such as lobbying of members of Parliament, candlelight vigils, leaflets and
petitioning, conferences, regular public meetings and demonstrations.
At coalition events we always show just what the effects of sanctions and
war are on the civilian population of Iraq. This includes the youth, women,
disabled and other sections of Iraqi society.
We have been able to achieve this through speakers at our events from
members of the Iraqi community, humanitarian relief workers and campaigning
activists from a wide range of organisations.
At present we are currently working to develop our links with schools and
communities inside Iraq and the Middle East as a whole, because the human
suffering in Iraq will naturally have its effects upon people in
neighbouring countries.
In this growing climate towards war, where Iraq is still being bombed on
an almost daily basis, the coalition would like to inform people that on
Saturday 10 November we will be holding a day conference in Liverpool.
This is so that we can come together to hear speakers such as Felicity
Arbuthnot. She is a freelance journalist and regular visitor to Iraq.
The conference will be held at the Liverpool dockers' CASA Club (29, Hope
Street, near Lime Street Railway Station) from 11 am to 5pm. A light lunch
will be provided. Entrance fee will be �3.50 (employed), �2 unemployed or
free for those affected by asylum/immigration laws. The conference is open
to all. Stalls are available on request for a donation of �5 to cover costs.
For more information contact the coalition either at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or write to us at The Coalition Against sanctions
and War on Iraq, c/o Bridge 5 Mill, 22a Beswick Street, Ancoats, Greater
Manchester.
York
In York's Parliament Street members of York Green Party, the Socialist
Alliance and the city's Quaker community gathered at the fountain and lit
candles. Then they stood quietly, watched by a solitary policeman, holding
placards bearing anti-war slogans.
Protester Joyce Pickard said: "As long as the bombing goes on, we will
stand up and be counted."
Joyce Smith of the Anglian Pacifist Fellowship said: "Afghan lives are as
important as American lives lost in the attacks on the World Trade Centre.
The suffering of the Afghan people will not be helped by the bombing."
Bradford
Socialists, CND members and children were among the mostly silent anti-war
protesters who gathered in Bradford's Centenary Square to declare their
opposition to the bombing of Afghanistan.
The lecturers' union Natfhe banner was present as the group leafleted
passers by. Pro-war people hurled some insults and one of these was
escorted from the scene by one of the three policemen present.
The leaflets advertised a public meeting on Wednesday 10 October,
addressed by Bradford Green Councillor David Ford, Labour Councillor Muktar
Ali and others.
London
A number of Labour MPs joined a CND protest outside the House of Commons,
including Tam Dalyell, Alan Simpson and Bob Marshall Andrews. Former MP
Tony Benn was also there.
He said he could understand the anger of the Americans after the terrorist
attacks and their need to take some action.
But, he said: "We have torn up the Charter of the United Nations. This is
not the international community -- it's the two richest countries in the
world bombing the poorest."
The Stop the War Coalition also held a protest rally in Trafalgar Square.
A speaker for the coalition said: "These attacks are acts of war wholly
outside all legal, democratic and civilised norms. They will outrage people
across the globe."
Edinburgh
Nearly 100 protesters gathered in Edinburgh's Royal Mile, carrying banners
saying, "We mourn all victims of violence worldwide" and "Terror is no
antidote to terror". Mick Napier from the Stop the War Coalition said they
had gathered to commemorate "those dead and those about to die".
Glasgow
in Glasgow six people were arrested after a demonstration at a Ministry
of Defence building in Brown Street. Reports say that three men and a woman
climbed on to a ledge outside Kentigern House at 3.50pm and were arrested
at 6.30pm. Police said another two protesters on the ground were also
arrested.
Those who had scaled the first floor of the building unfurled a banner
saying, "What do the dead eat?"
A spokesperson for the Faslane Peace camp, who was present, said: "Bush
and Blair are nothing short of murderers themselves. If they have proof
against Osama bin Laden they should bnng him to trial through the
international law courts."
More than 400 protesters, including students, city workers and community
groups also descended on George Square in Glasgow for a two-hour vigil.
MSP Tommy Sheridan told the rally: "Missiles are not the answer. If you
really want to tackle hatred and injustice you have to start a war on
poverty in every corner of the world."
activist
Human rights activist Aamer Anwar also condemned the "retaliation" against
Afghanistan. He said: "The Government says it does not want the destruction
of the World Trade Centre to lead to a racist backlash against Muslims but
they have contributed to such an atmosphere by virtually equating Islam
with irrational violence."
Greenwich
A series of meetings involving Green Party members, the Socialist
Alliance, Globalise Resistance, CND and members of the New Communist Party
and Communist Party of Britain has organised a peace vigil.
It will be held this Friday evening at Blackheath Royal Standard near to
the home of the local MP, Nick Raynsford. There will also be coaches to the
big CND demonstration in London on Saturday 13 October.
There were also major demonstrations in Birmingham and Cardiff.
*************************
4) International story
Afghanistan - the British connection
by Sean Kelly
IN recent weeks, much has been written about CIA backing for the Afghan
Mujihadeen in the 1980's. Less is known about the British connection, and
in particular, the training and arming of what became known as the "Afghan
Arabs" who now form the backbone of the groups linked to Osama bin Laden.
Until the mid 80's, the CIA was supplying clandestinely obtained weapons
of Soviet bloc origin, obtained via third parties such as Israel. These
included obselete Russian made surface to air missiles.
In 1984, the House Intelligence Committee approved $50 million for covert
aid to the Mujihadeen, as a result of which the CIA was able to purchase
more up to date surface to air missiles from Oelikon of Switzerland and
Shorts of Belfast.
After this initial priyment, the Reagan administration was able to
increase the funding until by the time of the Soviet withdrawal in 1989,
the total was in excess of $3.5 billion.
Shorts supplied the 'Blowpipe' hand held optiFally guided missile to the
British Army until it was replaced by the 'Javelin' in 1991. The operator
steered the missile via a wire and a joystick operated with the thumb.
The 'Blowpipe' was itself considered obselete compared to the self-guided
American made 'Stinger', but it proved effective in the Falklands war and
was to shift the balance of forces in Afghanistan against the Soviets.
Daud Rams, a Mig 21 pilot with the Afghan airforce who later defected
stated "The Blowpipe missile didn't present as serious a problem to fighter
aircraft as Stinger. Both Stinger and Blowpipe were real problems for
helicopters, but we were more concerned with Stinger".
British members of Parliament were prohibited form tabling written
questions concerning 'Blowpipe' as late as 1989. However on the June 26,
1987, the then Foreign Secretary, Geoffrey Howe was repeatedly challenged
by Labour MP's to confirm whether the CIA and MI6 had collaborated to
supply "Hundreds" of Blowpipe missiles to the Afghans. Howe was goaded into
admitting that "Most MP's will thank goodness that modern weapons are
getting through to them".
The main problem with 'Blowpipe' was that the heavy weapon required
considerable training to be effective. The CIA and MI6 maintained secret
training camps in Saudi Arabia and Oman. Over 10 000 "Afghan Arabs" had
graduated from these camps by the end of the conflict.
British training was provided by KMS ltd, a Jersey registered company
based in London. KMS employed ex-members of the Special Air Services and
were heavily involved in helping the Sultan of Oman repress Marxist rebels
in the Dhafur province.
It was there that the mercenaries amended the SAS motto "Who dares Wins"
to "Who Pays Wins". It was also in Oman that the name KMS came about, from
'Keenie Meenie Services', based on the local phrase for "under the counter".
KMS was first euposed by Time Out magasine in 1978. Much later the London
Daily News was to describe it as "no ordinary security company". Indeed, in
1978 it was linked to Nicaraguan bomb outrages by David Leigh and Paul
Lashmar in The Observer newspaper.
This was strenuously denied by Major David Walker who then ran the
company. However docuements which came to light during the "lrangate"
congressional enquiries show that the company was paid $110 000 to supply
helicopter pilots to the Contras.
George Foulkes, Labour foreign affairs spokesman said "Mrs Thatcher
expresses outrage at terrorism wherever it is to be found. It is total
hypocrisy to say this and then turn a blind eye to a sabotage operation run
from the UK".
Walker was recorded meeting William Clasey of the CIA and Colonel Oliver
North. Walker was introduced to North by an old university chum, John
Lehman, US Navy Secretary 1981 to 1987. Telephone records at ihe Pentagon
exposed during the "Iran Contra affair" show that Walker was in regular
contact with Lehman.
On November 22, 1987 the London Observer's Simon de Bruxelles published a
secret proposal from KMS to the CIA headed 'Confidential'. The three page
document now makes very interesting reading. The report proposes sending
small teams of ex-SAS instructors into Afghanistan in order to train rebels
in "demolition, sabotage, reconnaissance and para-medecine".
It went on to state that "KMS has been training special forces and
unconventional units for over 10 years. The Company's proven success in all
theatres, South America, Africa, Middle and Far East is unrivalled.
The Company's instructors are drawn from special forces and elite
regiments of the British Army. [The] Existing system for training in
Pakistan has a number of disadvantages, not least the requirement to train
over 50 per cent Pakistani students on courses".
The report suggests sending three man teams into Afghanistan to train
small, specially selected groups of Mujihadeen."
This imposes difficult living conditions and poor logistic support on the
instructors, but pays dividends many times over in the quality of training
passed on.
The instructors will have a broad base of experience in unconventional
warfare skills but will expect to teach two main skills to start with:
demolition and sabotage, and paramedical aid".
It went on; "The cost of a three-man team for one year will be �160,000.
This includes management visits, air fares to Pakistan and some equipment."
A US intelligence source confirmed to the Observer "David Walker and KMS
are involved in authorised covert operations... Afghanistan and Pakistan
are areas in which KMS is probably involved".
*********************
5) British news item
Good riddance to Railtrack.
by Daphne Liddle
PASSENGERS and rail workers alike reacted with joy last week to the news
that the Government has finally wound up the ailing Railtrack and has, for
the time being at least, taken Britain's railways, stations and signals
back under Government control.
The move follows pressure from the Treasury, which lost patience with
Railtrack's continual demands for more and more taxpayers' money while
failing to deliver even basic safety, never mind an acceptable service.
Chancellor Gordon Brown had flatly refused any more Government money to
bail out the collapsed company. He pointed out this would jeopardise
Government plans for schools and hospitals.
The Treasury says the alteration of the structure of Railtrack into a non
profit-making trust will not be a drain on public finances. The trust will
have to take on the current �4.5 billion debt amassed by Railtrack, to be
covered in due course by revenues from the train operating companies.
Nevertheless, the Government will ensure the trust has enough reserves to
function and the �30 billion that the Government has already pledged for
improving the rail network will stand. This means that work on upgrading
the West Coast Mainline, construction the Channel Tunnel rail link and some
other projects already in progress will continue.
The prospects of projects yet to be started are not so certain.
The new body is likely to be owned by the train operating companies,
passenger groups and the unions, along with the Strategic Rail Authority.
The trust is expected to take control of Railtrack's massive �150 million a
month overspends, investing revenues and not paying dividends.
A Treasury spokesperson said: "It had an increasing mountain of debt that
was never going to be fundable, given what the regulator would allow."
The two main Government watchdogs on the performance of the railways,
rail regulator Tom Winsor and the Strategic Rail Authority will be merged.
Trade and Industry Secretary Stephen Byers said: "For Railtrack there
will be no bailout, no last-minute rescue paid for by the taxpayer. Our
action today will see the end of Railtrack.
"In my judgement, the time had come to take back the track and put the
interests of the travelling public first.
"But this is only one part of a fundamental restructuring of the rail
industry. I intend to rationalise the present system of regulation to
provide a more united approach, with stronger strategic direction while
stopping the day-to-day interference in the industry."
Rail unions have welcomed the move. Mick Rix, general secretary of the
drivers' union Aslef, said: "If this is to be a return to some measure
ofpubiic control, that would be a welcome first step towards the radical
restructuring the railway needs."
And a spokesperson for the RMT transport union said: "We believe there
should be a return to public ownership. The industry should never have been
privatised in the first place. The whole saga has been a scandal."
The change should not lead to any job cuts except at top management
level. Trains will continue to run as normal.
Meanwhile the Railtrack board and the shareholders are furious. Railtrack
chief executive Stephen Marshall has resigned, complaining that the
Government has treated it very badly.
Shares in Railtrack cost �3.60 at privatisation in 1996 and rose to
nearly �18 in 1998 before falling again due to fears that it would not be
able to raise money needed for the massive improvements to the rail network.
At the close of trading on Friday share stood at �2.77 but shareholders
are unlikely to get much for them.
Professor Stuart Cole from the Transport Research Centre at the
University of Glamorgan said: "At the end of the day everyone who invests
in the stock market knows the risks they are taking. And just as those who
sold at �18 will have done well, so those who now have shares have lost
money."
The halfway step towards renationalisation follows years of pressure from
unions, passengers and others. Even capitalists need a functioning,
efficient transport system for themselves, their goods and their workers.
And even they could see that Railtrack's demands on taxpayers' money had
become a bottomless pit and a drain on all.
But the move will also send a powerful signal to future investors in
privatised utilities. Already shares in Jarvis, Balfour Beatty, Carrillion
and other construction companies used by Railtrack have fallen.
The Government must also be aware of the message this sends to the
companies waiting to get involved in the London Underground public private
partnership (partial privatisation). Many are the same companies involved
with Railtrack.
Finance experts say the private sector is unlikely to be rushing forward
to lend money to the new trust to fund future major projects. One said:
"The private sector has had its hand bitten off, it won't be putting out
the other one in a hurry."
Meanwhile, interviews of passengers at Leeds City station on the morning
the news broke produced the following comments:
* "It was an absurd idea to set Railtrack up in the first place and I was
horrified at its safety record."
* "Safety first should have been Railtrack's driving force all along and
it wasn't. So it's splendid news that it's to be succeeded by a
non-profit-making company which will put safety before profits."
* "Something had to be done."
* "Best news for a long time."
* "Good riddance to Railtrack."
Of course, there are no guarantees that the new trust will be able to
resolve all the problems of our rail network. Even capitalist pundits,
writing in the London Evening Standard, acknowledge this will take an awful
lot of money and a "20-year plan". And there are no guarantees this Labour
government will not try to re-privatise it at some stage. And it is still
not full renationalisation.
But it is a big step in the right direction that will send a big message
to capitalism in Britain and the world.
*********************
New Communist Party of Britain Homepage
http://www.newcommunistparty.org.uk
A news service for the Working Class!
Workers of all countries Unite!
_________________________________________________
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
General class struggle news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Geopolitical news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
