What would happen would be the same as happened in Japan over interest
rates. The government there thought that what has been discouraging
investment was not low profit prospects but too high interest rates. So
they reduced short-term interest rates to zero � but nothing happened. 

They learned the hard way that you can take a horse to water but you can't
make it drink. Japanese capitalists hadn't been not investing because of
high interest rates but because of low profit prospects. 

Similarly, capitalists have been speculating rather than investing
productively, not because the gains to be had from speculation are too
high but because the gains to be had from productive investment are too
low.

Actually, ATTAC are not agreed on why they want to impose an international
tax on currency transactions. Some want to do this to encourage productive
investment and so employment (on the mistaken arguments above). 

Others want to use the revenue to help the so-called Third World; which,
of course, assumes that speculation should continue as the cow to be
milked for this purpose. Susan George has explained the arguments here:

"One of the aspects of this tax is to slow down speculation, i.e. making
money with money without passing via an exchange of commodities. It could
build up a mass of money to help essentially the citizens of the South
since it is there that the needs are. At the moment, there is a debate
within ATTAC about whether we want a high tax to stop speculation or, on
the contrary, a less high one to restrain speculation while building up
this financial aid to the citizen. Personally, I prefer the second option"
(Le Soir, 24 September).

It is for this reason that you find different rates being mentioned in
ATTAC literature from 0.01 percent to 0.1 percent to the 0.5 percent that
Tobin himself suggested (but he wanted to stop speculation and was not
particularly concerned how the money raised was used).

George's preference for a low rate, to raise money to spend in the Third
World, is in accordance with ATTAC's main declared aim, but it involves
calling people on to the streets not to denounce capitalist exploitation,
but to demand a minimal tax on the financial transactions in which
capitalists try to swindle each other out of the proceeds of their past
exploitation of the working class.

It really is one of the most pathetic reform proposals for which people
have ever been called upon to demonstrate for. Of course, people are right
to protest against the deal capitalism is meting out to the poor in the
capitalistically-underdeveloped parts of the world, but the Tobin tax is
not going to help them in the least, even if the political will and
technical means to implement it could be found.

Tobin was � and still is � an unrepentant Keynesian. Despite the fact that
the main result of implementing Keynesian policies was a 30-40 year period
of permanent inflation, Susan George and ATTAC are essentially "global
Keynesians", people who want to apply on a global scale Keynes's ideas on
how to make capitalism work better. George in fact has openly called for
the adoption of Keynesian policies. As she put it in the Le Soir interview
we have already quoted:

"Our leaders must be more serious and move towards Keynesian solutions, as
was the case after the Second World War. We need a Marshall Plan for the
environment, for reducing inequalities in the world and particularly in
the South".
And
"We don't expect le grand soir [a derogatory French term meaning "the
Revolution"], but a more democratic type of economy. The market will have
its place, but not all the place".

What ATTAC, and their equivalents in this country, the campaigning
non-governmental organisations (NGOs) such as Oxfam, the World Development
Movement, Christian Aid, etc (not that some of them are all that
"non-governmental", given the grants they get from the state), want is to
retain the world market economy but to try to control it for the benefit
of humanity, to humanise it. 

Their hearts may be in the right place but this is to display an
incredible lack of vision as well as an appalling ignorance of the way
capitalism works, and has to work.

Capitalism operates according to the rules of "no profit, no production"
and "can't pay, can't have" and, as the world market system, is what is
responsible for the desperate plight of most of the world's population. 

Before anything lasting and constructive can be done about this,
capitalism has to go. The productive resources of the Earth have to become
the common heritage of all humanity, so that production can be directed to
meeting people's needs � all people's needs � instead of to making
profits.

Jt

www.worldsocialism.org


________________________________________________________________
Nokia 5510 looks weird sounds great. 
Go to http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/nokia/ discover and win it! 
The competition ends 16 th of December 2001.

Reply via email to