From: Miroslav Antic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Subject: 9/11 - What Was Israel's Role?  [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

9/11 - What Was Israel's Role?

Fox News revelations point to an ominous conclusion
         

by Justin Raimondo

When is American foreign policy going to start putting America first?
The US had nothing to gain, and everything to lose, by vetoing a UN
resolution condemning violence on all sides in the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict. The resolution condemned terrorism, no matter what the source,
called for the creation of a "monitoring mechanism" to prevent violence,
denounced executions without trial, and said the destruction of property
must cease. You gotta problem with that?

Negrooponte's Veto
This administration does: John Negroponte, American ambassador to the
UN, justified the US veto by averring that the resolution aimed to
"isolate politically one of the parties to the conflict through an
attempt to throw the weight of the Council behind the other party.'' The
resolution, said Negroponte, was unsatisfactory because it didn't
specifically mention "recent acts of terrorism'' against Israelis.
Naturally, this scuttled the whole thing, as it was intended to do.

The Victimological Olympics
For this argument, if carried on long enough, would lead to an infinite
regression of victimological examples: the pro-Arab bloc would insist on
specifically mentioning the supposedly accidental killing of five
Palestinian children by an Israeli booby-trap bomb planted near a
school. This would be the cue for the Israeli side to come up with a
Hamas-Hizbollah atrocity that merits inclusion - and, before you know
it, we're all the way back to 1948 with the pro-Arabists demanding the
inclusion of the massacre at Deir Yassein, and, naturally, the Zionist
bloc doing them one better by moving for some mention of the Roman
conquest and persecution of the Jews.

THE WAR AGAINST THE WORLD
The US veto undermines the war effort, and makes the Americans seem as
if they are waging a war not only on Islam, but against the entire world
on behalf of Israel. After decades of trying to prove its bona fides as
an honest broker of peace in the region, it is the US that is
effectively isolated. The resolution was co-sponsored (or amended) by
France and the Security Council vote was 12-1, with Britain and Norway
abstaining. Whatever credibility the US had in the Arab world - very
little, I'm afraid - was lost with that one arrogant gesture. So much
for the grand "coalition" that Colin Powell has been building: the
Israeli lobby in the US has demolished it with a single blow.

THE LAST LAUGH
Is that the demonic laughter of the Mad Sheik I hear, chortling in his
cave at this act of American self-sabotage? It may be Osama bin Laden is
not long for this world. Yet he will die happy in the knowledge that the
US is sowing the seeds of his future warrior army, who will spring like
Muslim Myrmidons out of Palestine's blood-soaked earth.

BATTLEGROUND AMERICA
Speaking of sabotage, the story of the gigantic Israeli spy operation in
the US - and its mysterious activities in the weeks prior to 9/11 -
continues to amaze and shock even me. When I wrote, a few weeks ago,
that the detention of some 60 Israelis in connection with 9/11 was
"ominous" little did I realize just how much of an understatement that
would turn out to be. It is often said that, post-9/11, the US is going
through what the Israelis have had to endure for decades. The series of
Fox News special reports on Israeli penetration of US intelligence
assets puts this insight in an entirely new light. For it appears, from
what we are learning, that the struggle between two desert tribes in a
far away land has truly been brought home to the US: America, we are
discovering to our horror, has become a battleground for both sides in
that ancient conflict.

ENDS & MEANS
As I related last week, the first part of this astonishing four-part
series by Fox News reporter Carl Cameron presents credible evidence
suggesting Israeli intelligence had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks.
The second and third parts show they had the means to acquire this
knowledge. According to Cameron,

"Fox News has learned that some American terrorist investigators fear
certain suspects in the Sept. 11 attacks may have managed to stay ahead
of them, by knowing who and when investigators are calling on the
telephone."

ALL ROADS LEAD TO AMDOCS
Cameron takes us through an explanation of how and why virtually all
telephone calls in the US are billed by a single company, Amdocs Ltd.,
which just happens to be headquartered in Israel. Chances are that when
you make a call, the record of the call and the billing is done through
Amdocs. With a virtual monopoly in the US, and tentacles worldwide,
Cameron reports that "it is virtually impossible to make a call on
normal phones without generating an Amdocs record of it." Amdocs denies
any wrongdoing, but sources tell Fox News that, in 1999,

"The super secret national security agency, headquartered in northern
Maryland, issued what's called a Top Secret sensitive compartmentalized
information report, TS/SCI, warning that records of calls in the United
States were getting into foreign hands - in Israel, in particular."

SPIES IN THE WOODWORK
It's not that anyone is listening in on all these calls, but that these
methods are a way to know who is calling whom, when, and for how long -
vital information in and of itself. Cameron assures us that the White
House and the Pentagon are immune from such surveillance, but an article
in Insight, the magazine put out by the Washington Times, showed how
Israeli intelligence had thoroughly penetrated the communications system
at the Clinton White House. According to co-authors J. Michael Waller
and Paul M. Rodriguez, writing in May of last year, the FBI was

"Probing an explosive foreign-espionage operation that could dwarf the
other spy scandals plaguing the U.S. government. Insight has learned
that FBI counterintelligence is tracking a daring operation to spy on
high-level US officials by hacking into supposedly secure telephone
networks. The espionage was facilitated, federal officials say, by lax
telephone-security procedures at the White House, State Department and
other high-level government offices and by a Justice Department
unwillingness to seek an indictment against a suspect."

"The espionage operation may have serious ramifications," wrote Waller
and Rodriguez, "because the FBI has identified Israel as the culprit."

MONICA TELLS ALL
Dozens of officials confirmed the story, telling the authors of this
fascinating piece how the Israelis had managed to penetrate not only
State Department telephone lines, but also those in the White House, the
Defense Department, and the Justice Department. That the President knew
this at the time is beyond doubt; it came out, you'll remember, during
l'affaire Lewinsky, when Monica testified that, on March 29, 1997, she
and Clinton were desecrating the Oval Office and she specifically
remembered it because, as the Starr Report put it:

"He suspected that a foreign embassy was tapping his telephones, and he
proposed cover stories. If ever questioned, she should say that the two
of them were just friends. If anyone ever asked about their phone sex,
she should say that they knew their calls were being monitored all
along, and the phone sex was just a put on."

LITTLE DID THEY KNOW
That "foreign embassy" was the Israelis'. It is spooky, in retrospect,
to read the comments of the American intelligence and law enforcement
officials who sourced this pioneering Insight piece (which, for some
reason, is no longer available on their website but is still available,
thanks to the miracle of Google). "It's a huge security nightmare," said
one senior US official. "The implications are severe," another unnamed
official chimed in. "We're not even sure we know the extent of it," said
a third high-ranking intelligence official. "All I can tell you is that
we think we know how it was done. That alone is serious enough, but it's
the unknown that has such deep consequences."

OUT OF THE MURK
Ah, but the deepness of these consequences is just beginning to be
known. As the Fox News revelations make all too clear, they are a lot
deeper than anyone, including Waller and Rodriguez, could possibly have
imagined last year. The picture that is beginning to emerge out of the
murk is this: the Israelis were watching the hijackers and/or their
associates, and they very possibly had access to a complete set of the
conspirators' phone records, if not direct access to the content of
their conversations. In the months prior to the attacks, the Israelis
did indeed issue a warning of "massive" terrorist attacks, but, in an
effort to protect both their sources and methods, their warning gave no
details and was therefore practically useless.

THE COMVERSE CONNECTION
The third part of the Fox series shows how the Israelis had access, not
only to phone records, but also to the wiretaps being conducted by US
law enforcement agencies. This access could have easily been provided,
Cameron points out, by yet another hi-tech Israeli communications
company, Comverse, which operates as practically a branch of the Israeli
government, and enjoys near monopolistic status here in the US.

When you place a call, it goes through a complicated network of routers
and switchers. The way wiretapping works is that customized computers
are linked to that network via specialized software, and the system
intercepts, records, and stores wiretapped calls. But this system has a
"back door" that could have easily been opened by Israeli intelligence.
Comverse maintains a link to the wiretapping computers, on the grounds
that it is necessary for system "maintenance." Over the opposition of
some patriotic law enforcement officers, this process was authorized by
the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). But
that wasn't the end of it. According to Fox News,

"Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller were
both warned Oct. 18 in a hand-delivered letter from 15 local, state and
federal law enforcement officials, who complained that 'law
enforcement's current electronic surveillance capabilities are less
effective today than they were at the time CALEA was enacted.'"

ASHCROFT'S COMPLICITY
But Ashcroft is too busy rounding up Arabs and closing down their
organizations to worry about the wholesale penetration of our
communications system - including "secure" networks at the White House,
the Defense Department, and elsewhere - by our wonderful allies, the
Israelis. Cameron cites several unnamed law enforcement agents -
concerned about the ominous implications of the Israeli penetration in
light of 9/11 - who say that even raising the issue is "career suicide."

I HOPE YOU'RE SITTING DOWN
Okay, so the Israelis have the phone lines over at the White House, the
Defense Department, the Justice Department, and, for all we know, your
local dogcatcher's office bugged to the max. So they have the capability
to know where and when practically every phone call in the US, and large
sections of the rest of the world, is made, and to whom. As fantastic as
it sounds, given the advance of technology and the reputation of the
Mossad, I'm willing to believe it. What's really alarming, however, is
that, as Cameron reports:

"On a number of cases, suspects that they had sought to wiretap and
survey immediately changed their telecommunications processes. They
started acting much differently as soon as those supposedly secret
wiretaps went into place."

BEYOND THE BEGUINE
The implications of this stunning news go far beyond my original
contention: that the Israelis had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks and
simply failed to let us know the details. For it all depends on the
intended target of the wiretaps: was it the Israelis, or Bin Laden's
agents? If the former were acting differently after wiretaps were put in
place, it means only that the Israelis were using their sources and
methods to protect their own: if the latter, it means the Israelis were
using their sources and methods to protect the Bin Ladenites. That is a
possibility no one - including me - wants to contemplate, and, in all
truthfulness, I must confess I cannot believe it. I am forced to
concede, however, that, given what we now know, it is possible. Until
and unless the government comes clean, we won't know for sure.

INVESTIGATE THE ISRAELI CONNECTION
At the end of his second report, Carl Cameron remarked to Brit Hume that
the question of the Israeli connection to 9/11 "came up in the select
intelligence committee on Capitol Hill today," and "they intend to look
into what we reported last night." Naturally, all this is occurring in
secret, with the likelihood of a cover-up all but certain. What is
needed is a public investigation, and full disclosure of the Israeli
role, if any, in 9/11.

WHERE IS THE MEDIA?
That, of course, is the role of the media - and, in this regard, it is
interesting to note that Cameron's explosive investigation has not been
picked up by a single news outlet, as far as I know (although I would be
happy to be proved wrong) or discussed by a single "mainstream"
columnist. Yet Fox News is hardly a marginal new source. In a business
where scandal and especially spy stories are hot, you would think that a
story like this, with its tie-in to 9/11, would have the other networks
and the major media falling all over themselves to get a piece of the
action. But not this time, at least so far.

FAN MAIL FROM SOME CRANKY FLOUNDER
It's funny, but when I wrote my first column on this subject, I got a
whole bunch of nutball letters from anti-Semitic cranks who told me that
"the Jews" would never let me get away with it, and that I am now a
"marked man." This story, wrote one correspondent, "will go nowhere,"
because "the Jews" control the media, blah blah blah. I laughed, reading
these perfervid notes, most of them WRITTEN IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS,
wondering at the infinite capacity of people to fit reality into
ideological categories rather than the other way 'round. After all, the
mere fact that the story was broadcast on Fox News, a major media
organization, appears to contradict the self-evidently absurd thesis
that the "Elders of Zion," sitting in a control room somewhere,
determine what news we're allowed to read.

THE ANTI-SEMITIC FALLACY
I can only hope, for Mr. Cameron's sake, that what amounts to "career
suicide" in law enforcement doesn't hold true at Fox News. Israel
certainly has many vocal and very active supporters, who are quick to
make their opinions known. But it is false to posit a
"Jewish-controlled" media, no matter what the ethnicity or political
persuasion of editors, owners, or whatever: these media companies are
beholden to their shareholders, and to the market. Reporting the news is
an intensely competitive business: there is no way to enforce an embargo
on certain information, not in this day and age. There is no "Jewish
conspiracy" - only the machinations of a particular foreign government
and its uncritical supporters in this country, who span the ethnic and
religious as well as the political spectrum.

THE TRUTH, AT LAST
It is too soon to say whether or not this story has "legs," as they say,
and is going anywhere soon. But one thing's for sure: Fox News has blown
the mystery of 9/11 wide open. This isn't going to just go away. On
September 11, the American people looked on in disbelief at the sight of
not only the World Trade Center going down but the Pentagon - the
Pentagon, fer chrissake! - under attack and apparently defenseless. My
first thought, at any rate, was: How could this happen? With these
latest surprising developments - pointing to an ambiguous Israeli role,
at best, in all this - I fear we are just beginning to discover the
answer to that question.

Mr. Justin Raimondo is the editorial director of Antiwar.com

Source:
by courtesy & C 2001 Justin Raimondo & Antiwar.com


_________________________________________________
 
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
 
General class struggle news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Geopolitical news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________

Reply via email to