Editorial
(Appearing in People's Democracy of Dec. 30, 2001)

Tackle Terrorist Threat Without War

The possibility of a war with Pakistan is still being seriously 
considered by the BJP-led government. Pressure for military strikes 
across the border is building up. Both India and Pakistan have 
mobilised their armed forces and deployed them in forward positions 
alongwith heavy military equipment. Heavy shelling and firing is 
taking place across the line of control and the international border.
Leading the cries for war are a section of the BJP leaders and the 
RSS. They are aided and abetted by some of the strategic experts and 
sections of the media. The argument put forth after the December 13 
terrorist attack on the Indian parliament is that the terrorist 
organisations based in Pakistan must be attacked and annihilated for 
ending such terrorist activities. More than the need to isolate and 
suppress the extremist groups indulging in terrorist violence, the 
rhetoric is directed at the existence of Pakistan itself. According to 
the RSS paper, Organiser "The time has come to solve the problem that 
is Pakistan forever and for all". The Organiser editorial argues that 
no measure short of an outright war to destroy Pakistan will do. In 
true fascist style it calls for stamping out any opposition to this 
war mongering by asking the government to "crush any act of terrorism, 
intellectual or otherwise." The RSS obviously sees a golden 
opportunity to whip up war hysteria for its communal aims.

The CPI(M) has strongly argued against the use of military force as a 
response to the December 13 attack on parliament. The investigations 
have identified the Jaish-e-Mohammed as the perpetrators of the attack 
and the armed squad comprised persons from Pakistan. The Indian 
government has a strong case to present before the world community. It 
should demand that the United Nations initiate steps against the 
terrorist organisations based in Pakistan. The Security Council has 
adopted resolution 1373 after the September 11 attacks in the USA, 
which provides the framework for acting against such terrorist 
attacks. After the removal of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan by the 
US military operations, the focus is very much on the 
extremist-fundamentalist groups existing in Pakistan. There is a 
favourable international situation in which India can effectively 
mobilise opinion to pressurise President Musharraf to take firm steps 
to curb the terrorist outfits. The fact that Musharraf in his first 
statement had to state that he would take action if evidence is 
produced about involvement of any person based in Pakistan shows that 
he has to respond to international scrutiny.

Backed by international sanction, India's demand for action against 
those guilty of the attacks will get strengthened. Any failure to act 
will put the Pakistani regime in dock.

Instead of pursuing such a course, any military action, however 
limited, can lead to a full-scale war. An Indo-Pakistan war will mean 
the focus on terrorist activities originating from Pakistan will be 
sidetracked. The world will see only an Indo-Pakistan conflict fraught 
with the danger of a nuclear confrontation. Given the military balance 
of strength between the two countries, a war will result in a 
stalemate with serious casualties in terms of lives and economic 
resources. A war will also not lead to success in eliminating the 
terrorist groups. On the contrary, the fundamentalist forces who are 
isolated in Pakistan today will be able to stage a comeback riding on 
the anti-India feelings generated.

The diplomatic and political steps to be taken to force the Pakistani 
regime to delegitimise and curb the activities of the fundamentalist 
groups is the best course of action. The whole country will support 
such measures to bring the purveyors of terror to book. The Vajpayee 
government must desist from giving in to the bellicose war cries of 
its ideological mentor.
end



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://in.docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to