Le Mercredi 5 Avril 2006 19:25, Matt Rogers a écrit : > no, it doesn't. I don't know how much more clearer I can make this. I > need an id value that will not change _EVER_. it's assigned once during > metacontact creation and as long as that metacontact is in the > contactlist somewhere, that id should NEVER change. if it changes when > the kabc assignment changes, then it doesn't work.
In pratice it doesn't change. How lany times per year do you change the kabc integration ? > metacontactId() is not appropriate for my usage. i suppose i'll just > invent something else. > > In kde4 if all contact are associated to kabc, i think the kabc id will > > be suitable. (that's the plan) > > and as i'm sure everybody is aware, i'm against forcing all contacts to > have some sort of address book association. Am I the only one that > doesn't use IM as an addressbook? :( addressbook is a bad word It will be a kabc ressource. That does mean you can still have your kopete contactlist and your main addressbook ressource separated.
pgpgqyCel94vj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
