I think probably the biggest obstacle for the Kopete messages styles is that they don't currently require an Info.plist.
Perhaps we could come up with some other sort of ini-type file that would be useful to them, so Kopete style authors will use it? -Colin On Aug 31, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Chris Forsythe wrote: > Regarding the action template in Adium, after 1.0 (i.e. in 1.1) if > everyone likes it then that sounds like a plan. > > Overall if we (Adium folks) can get standardization between any > other clients I think we should hop onto that. For anyone > interested, Colin made a mailing list for the Universal Log Format: > > http://groups.google.com/group/ulf-discuss > > I think it would be beneficial if both clients kept the message > style format so that they can be used in either. I've seen reports > on the Xtras site that message styles that are from Kopete folks > tend to not work. Nothing substantiated, but it does show that we > need to come up with a plan on it if there isn't one already so that > message views work between the two clients. > > Chris Forsythe > > > Colin Barrett wrote: > >> Currently, Kopete has a very nice guide to the organization of >> message styles, here: >> >> http://kopete.kde.org/chatwindowstyleguide/index.html >> >> I like their Action template, and was considering adding it to >> Adium. What do you guys think about this? >> >> Secondly, I was wondering if we (the Kopete and Adium teams) should >> go over the current format and decide what we like, don't like, >> want to improve, and just generally get a dialog going between the >> two parties. Also, I think it would be neat if we could get some >> kind of interaction between this message style and the ULF logging >> format, perhaps with XSLT? I'm just speculating here. >> >> Hopefully yours, >> -Colin >> _______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
