You're both right. Big company. Big dark side. On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 06:51:13PM -0800, Michael J McCafferty wrote: > > Bwahahahahahaah now THAT's funny. Being that I know that is NOT true, I > suppose > out's me as having worked there... so I guess that means that I can't be > trusted to tell you the truth on the matter, which means I guess you must be > right ! But, if I say that you are right, then I guess you can't be right, > unless your point of view fits with The Company Line. > > Break out the tin foil buddy !!! I am gonna get my brain messer-upper thingie > out and aim it at you ! > > Dude, they are no more a quasi-anything than CSC, EDS, IBM, or anyone else > that > does a lot of systems integration work for the US and other governments. If > they were a quasi whatever the fuck you think they are then would they do work > for foreign governments ? > > I didn't see any smilies and it's too wishy washy to be sarcasm. > > I can not comment on the recent news stories. I refer you to the offcial > CIAS... > errr umm SAIC web site. > > > > Dude !!! It's a COINCIDENCE that the name is CIA's in reverse. Tin Foil man > !!! > Best go get yours ! Best go double strength ! Shiny side out ! > > > > Quoting DJA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Todd Walton wrote: > > > It seems that SAIC has cut their own throat. Oops? > > > > > > Identity theft feared after break-in at top firm: > > > http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002178882_saic13.html > > > > > > To hell with SAIC's reputation as a company involved in information > > > security. A break-in at a defense contractor like SAIC is a concern > > > bigger than SAIC's market status. > > > > > > -todd > > > > They're not just another government contractor, they are an unofficial > > (quasi-?) governmental agency. Think of them as one of the black arms of > > the Defense Department. > >
-- Lan Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Guy, SCM Specialist 858-354-0616 -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
