On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 10:28, Todd Walton wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:50:32 -0800 (PST), Neil Schneider > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It's not a coincedence that the whole board of directors is all > > retired high-ranking military officers, however. > > Good point. Very well put. > > You don't have to be paranoid to recognize that SAIC holds a position > with the federal government that few other companies do. A position > beyond simple "contractor". > > -todd
Good point? Is there a relationship between the contracts SAIC is pursuing and the expertise of those "retired high-ranking military officers" (Either technical or business development contact-wise) on the board of SAIC? If there is, would it make more business sense for them to have a board of directors full of retired high ranking performers of the American Ballet Theater? Or maybe the National Association of Real Estate Appraisers or some other area lacking basic knowledge of the contract process of the Fed Gov't and defense needs in particular? This is a "well we all know that..." and/or a "You <i>know</i> [blank] is a [blank]" point. RBW -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
